Loading…

Can the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations Model Predict Health Behavior 1 Year Later?

Objective: The capabilities (C), opportunities (O) and motivations (M) model of behavior (B) change (COM-B) is designed to capture the key features of numerous models of behavior change, but little is known about its predictive validity. The present study tests the predictive validity of COM-B prosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health psychology 2023-04, Vol.42 (4), p.270-275
Main Authors: Armitage, Christopher J., Munro, Kevin J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ab22355c4c8b0a7c3c3d34dc9a63c49080ab43971faf3f59a45b2646049f09f93
cites
container_end_page 275
container_issue 4
container_start_page 270
container_title Health psychology
container_volume 42
creator Armitage, Christopher J.
Munro, Kevin J.
description Objective: The capabilities (C), opportunities (O) and motivations (M) model of behavior (B) change (COM-B) is designed to capture the key features of numerous models of behavior change, but little is known about its predictive validity. The present study tests the predictive validity of COM-B prospectively in the domain of attending hearing screening. Method: 6,000 adults, representative of the U.K. population (e.g., 52.6% women) who one year earlier had reported COM with respect to attending hearing screening, were contacted again to complete an online survey with respect to their actual attendance. Data were analyzed descriptively, and with logistic regression to examine the influence of sociodemographic variables and COM on attendance at hearing screening. Results: Respondents reported being highly capable of attending hearing screening (Ms > 7.98 on a 0-10 scale), but much lower levels of automatic (M = 4.21 on a 0-10 scale) and reflective (M = 5.21 on a 0-10 scale) motivations. Logistic regression analyses showed that men and older people were more likely to have their hearing checked but that hearing difficulty was the dominant determinant of attending hearing screening. Controlling for these sociodemographic and clinical variables, opportunities and motivations (but not capabilities) were also significantly associated with behavior. Conclusions: The COM-B model was predictive of attending hearing screening over a one-year period, which potentially makes it valuable for understanding health behavior change. Interventions for improving uptake in hearing screening that goes beyond increasing knowledge and skills (capabilities) are required to increase attendance at hearing screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/hea0001269
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2798715995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2796523141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ab22355c4c8b0a7c3c3d34dc9a63c49080ab43971faf3f59a45b2646049f09f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_AgFrtWL_4BEvAitqNJXjKZnEQX-wO21IMePIU3mQybMjszJplC_3uzbrXgxdN7Dz58efAl5BVn7zkD_WHrkTHGRW2ekBU3wCrdcPaUrJjQTVVzgGPyPKXbgoRR6hk5Bs0EgNArYtc40rz1dI0ztmEIOfh0Rm_meYp5GX-fFMeOXk853GEO05jK3vmBfo2-Cy7TS49D3tLPfot3YYqU0x8eI91g9vHjC3LU45D8y4d5Qr6ff_m2vqw2NxdX60-bCkGbXGErBCjlpGtahtqBgw5k5wzW4KRhDcNWgtG8xx56ZVCqVtSyZtL0zPQGTsjbQ-4cp5-LT9nuQnJ-GHD005Ks0KbRXBmjCn3zD72dljiW7_bKCCGMlv9RtRLAJS_q3UG5OKUUfW_nGHYY7y1ndl-OfSyn4NcPkUu7891f-qeNAk4PoHRh53TvMObgBp_cEqMf8z7MSmFleYHBL64blr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2796523141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations Model Predict Health Behavior 1 Year Later?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Armitage, Christopher J. ; Munro, Kevin J.</creator><contributor>Ruiz, John M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Christopher J. ; Munro, Kevin J. ; Ruiz, John M</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The capabilities (C), opportunities (O) and motivations (M) model of behavior (B) change (COM-B) is designed to capture the key features of numerous models of behavior change, but little is known about its predictive validity. The present study tests the predictive validity of COM-B prospectively in the domain of attending hearing screening. Method: 6,000 adults, representative of the U.K. population (e.g., 52.6% women) who one year earlier had reported COM with respect to attending hearing screening, were contacted again to complete an online survey with respect to their actual attendance. Data were analyzed descriptively, and with logistic regression to examine the influence of sociodemographic variables and COM on attendance at hearing screening. Results: Respondents reported being highly capable of attending hearing screening (Ms &gt; 7.98 on a 0-10 scale), but much lower levels of automatic (M = 4.21 on a 0-10 scale) and reflective (M = 5.21 on a 0-10 scale) motivations. Logistic regression analyses showed that men and older people were more likely to have their hearing checked but that hearing difficulty was the dominant determinant of attending hearing screening. Controlling for these sociodemographic and clinical variables, opportunities and motivations (but not capabilities) were also significantly associated with behavior. Conclusions: The COM-B model was predictive of attending hearing screening over a one-year period, which potentially makes it valuable for understanding health behavior change. Interventions for improving uptake in hearing screening that goes beyond increasing knowledge and skills (capabilities) are required to increase attendance at hearing screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/hea0001269</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37023327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Attendance ; Auditory Acuity ; Behavior Change ; Clinical assessment ; Clinical variables ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Hearing ; Human ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical screening ; Motivation ; Older people ; Predictive Validity ; Regression analysis ; Sociodemographics ; Speech and Hearing Measures ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uptake ; Women</subject><ispartof>Health psychology, 2023-04, Vol.42 (4), p.270-275</ispartof><rights>2023 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2023, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ab22355c4c8b0a7c3c3d34dc9a63c49080ab43971faf3f59a45b2646049f09f93</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-2365-1765</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37023327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ruiz, John M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munro, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Can the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations Model Predict Health Behavior 1 Year Later?</title><title>Health psychology</title><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective: The capabilities (C), opportunities (O) and motivations (M) model of behavior (B) change (COM-B) is designed to capture the key features of numerous models of behavior change, but little is known about its predictive validity. The present study tests the predictive validity of COM-B prospectively in the domain of attending hearing screening. Method: 6,000 adults, representative of the U.K. population (e.g., 52.6% women) who one year earlier had reported COM with respect to attending hearing screening, were contacted again to complete an online survey with respect to their actual attendance. Data were analyzed descriptively, and with logistic regression to examine the influence of sociodemographic variables and COM on attendance at hearing screening. Results: Respondents reported being highly capable of attending hearing screening (Ms &gt; 7.98 on a 0-10 scale), but much lower levels of automatic (M = 4.21 on a 0-10 scale) and reflective (M = 5.21 on a 0-10 scale) motivations. Logistic regression analyses showed that men and older people were more likely to have their hearing checked but that hearing difficulty was the dominant determinant of attending hearing screening. Controlling for these sociodemographic and clinical variables, opportunities and motivations (but not capabilities) were also significantly associated with behavior. Conclusions: The COM-B model was predictive of attending hearing screening over a one-year period, which potentially makes it valuable for understanding health behavior change. Interventions for improving uptake in hearing screening that goes beyond increasing knowledge and skills (capabilities) are required to increase attendance at hearing screening.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Auditory Acuity</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical variables</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Speech and Hearing Measures</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0278-6133</issn><issn>1930-7810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_AgFrtWL_4BEvAitqNJXjKZnEQX-wO21IMePIU3mQybMjszJplC_3uzbrXgxdN7Dz58efAl5BVn7zkD_WHrkTHGRW2ekBU3wCrdcPaUrJjQTVVzgGPyPKXbgoRR6hk5Bs0EgNArYtc40rz1dI0ztmEIOfh0Rm_meYp5GX-fFMeOXk853GEO05jK3vmBfo2-Cy7TS49D3tLPfot3YYqU0x8eI91g9vHjC3LU45D8y4d5Qr6ff_m2vqw2NxdX60-bCkGbXGErBCjlpGtahtqBgw5k5wzW4KRhDcNWgtG8xx56ZVCqVtSyZtL0zPQGTsjbQ-4cp5-LT9nuQnJ-GHD005Ks0KbRXBmjCn3zD72dljiW7_bKCCGMlv9RtRLAJS_q3UG5OKUUfW_nGHYY7y1ndl-OfSyn4NcPkUu7891f-qeNAk4PoHRh53TvMObgBp_cEqMf8z7MSmFleYHBL64blr0</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Armitage, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Munro, Kevin J.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-1765</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Can the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations Model Predict Health Behavior 1 Year Later?</title><author>Armitage, Christopher J. ; Munro, Kevin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ab22355c4c8b0a7c3c3d34dc9a63c49080ab43971faf3f59a45b2646049f09f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Auditory Acuity</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical variables</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Speech and Hearing Measures</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munro, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armitage, Christopher J.</au><au>Munro, Kevin J.</au><au>Ruiz, John M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations Model Predict Health Behavior 1 Year Later?</atitle><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>270-275</pages><issn>0278-6133</issn><eissn>1930-7810</eissn><abstract>Objective: The capabilities (C), opportunities (O) and motivations (M) model of behavior (B) change (COM-B) is designed to capture the key features of numerous models of behavior change, but little is known about its predictive validity. The present study tests the predictive validity of COM-B prospectively in the domain of attending hearing screening. Method: 6,000 adults, representative of the U.K. population (e.g., 52.6% women) who one year earlier had reported COM with respect to attending hearing screening, were contacted again to complete an online survey with respect to their actual attendance. Data were analyzed descriptively, and with logistic regression to examine the influence of sociodemographic variables and COM on attendance at hearing screening. Results: Respondents reported being highly capable of attending hearing screening (Ms &gt; 7.98 on a 0-10 scale), but much lower levels of automatic (M = 4.21 on a 0-10 scale) and reflective (M = 5.21 on a 0-10 scale) motivations. Logistic regression analyses showed that men and older people were more likely to have their hearing checked but that hearing difficulty was the dominant determinant of attending hearing screening. Controlling for these sociodemographic and clinical variables, opportunities and motivations (but not capabilities) were also significantly associated with behavior. Conclusions: The COM-B model was predictive of attending hearing screening over a one-year period, which potentially makes it valuable for understanding health behavior change. Interventions for improving uptake in hearing screening that goes beyond increasing knowledge and skills (capabilities) are required to increase attendance at hearing screening.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>37023327</pmid><doi>10.1037/hea0001269</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-1765</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6133
ispartof Health psychology, 2023-04, Vol.42 (4), p.270-275
issn 0278-6133
1930-7810
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2798715995
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Aged
Attendance
Auditory Acuity
Behavior Change
Clinical assessment
Clinical variables
Female
Health Behavior
Hearing
Human
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Medical screening
Motivation
Older people
Predictive Validity
Regression analysis
Sociodemographics
Speech and Hearing Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
Uptake
Women
title Can the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations Model Predict Health Behavior 1 Year Later?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20the%20Capabilities,%20Opportunities%20and%20Motivations%20Model%20Predict%20Health%20Behavior%201%20Year%20Later?&rft.jtitle=Health%20psychology&rft.au=Armitage,%20Christopher%20J.&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=270-275&rft.issn=0278-6133&rft.eissn=1930-7810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/hea0001269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2796523141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-ab22355c4c8b0a7c3c3d34dc9a63c49080ab43971faf3f59a45b2646049f09f93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2796523141&rft_id=info:pmid/37023327&rfr_iscdi=true