Loading…

Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study

This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn mani...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2023-05, Vol.151 (5)
Main Authors: Dvorsky, Robyn, Rings, Franziska, Bibl, Katharina, Roessler, Lisa, Kumer, Lisa, Steinbauer, Philipp, Schwarz, Hannah, Ritschl, Valentin, Schmölzer, Georg M, Berger, Angelika, Werther, Tobias, Wagner, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 151
creator Dvorsky, Robyn
Rings, Franziska
Bibl, Katharina
Roessler, Lisa
Kumer, Lisa
Steinbauer, Philipp
Schwarz, Hannah
Ritschl, Valentin
Schmölzer, Georg M
Berger, Angelika
Werther, Tobias
Wagner, Michael
description This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn manikin. Participants were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (no-access), the feedback devices were not visible but recording. In group B (supervisor-access), the feedback devices were visible to the supervisor only. In group C (full-access), both the participant and the supervisor had visual access. The two main outcome variables were the percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (4-8mL/kg) and the number of intubation attempts. Group C achieved the highest percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (full-access 63.6%, supervisor-access 51.0%, no-access 31.1%, P < .001) and the lowest mask leakage (full-access 34.9%, supervisor-access 46.6%, no-access 61.6%; A to B: P < .001, A to C: P < .001, B to C: P = .003). Overall, group C achieved superior ventilation quality regarding primary and secondary outcome measures. The number of intubation attempts until success was lowest in the full-access group (full-access: 1.29, supervisor-access: 1.77, no-access: 2.43; A to B: P = .001, A to C: P < .001, B to C: P = .015). Our findings confirm that direct visual access to feedback devices for supervisor and trainees alike considerably benefits outcomes and can contribute to the future of clinical education.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.2022-059839
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2799826731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2810208050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUnAi5fU2a9m11spVoWC0FY9LptkAqlJtmaTQ_31JqR68DQzzDMvw0PINYUplYLd7zH1UwaMhSC14vqEjCloFQoWyVMyBuA0FAByRC683wGAkBE7JyMeAVdKqzH5WKMtwm1eYvBSNW1sm9xVga3S4B2rJi-GeYmYxjb5fAjmwbpbujL_xjRYuKqpXVF07SYv2yO8adr0cEnOMlt4vDrWCXlbPm4Xz-Hq9ellMV-FCWdREzJpgevIaiVjEfNMz1KpbWQRlLTZLGEcERlXwBTVXM2kppIJmQrBM5kg8Am5G3L3tftq0TemzH2CRWErdK03LNJasVnEaYfe_kN3rq2r7jvTpQMDBbIPhIFKaud9jZnZ13lp64OhYHrpppdueulmkN6d3ByD27jE9O_g1zL_Abu0e_k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2810208050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Dvorsky, Robyn ; Rings, Franziska ; Bibl, Katharina ; Roessler, Lisa ; Kumer, Lisa ; Steinbauer, Philipp ; Schwarz, Hannah ; Ritschl, Valentin ; Schmölzer, Georg M ; Berger, Angelika ; Werther, Tobias ; Wagner, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Dvorsky, Robyn ; Rings, Franziska ; Bibl, Katharina ; Roessler, Lisa ; Kumer, Lisa ; Steinbauer, Philipp ; Schwarz, Hannah ; Ritschl, Valentin ; Schmölzer, Georg M ; Berger, Angelika ; Werther, Tobias ; Wagner, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn manikin. Participants were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (no-access), the feedback devices were not visible but recording. In group B (supervisor-access), the feedback devices were visible to the supervisor only. In group C (full-access), both the participant and the supervisor had visual access. The two main outcome variables were the percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (4-8mL/kg) and the number of intubation attempts. Group C achieved the highest percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (full-access 63.6%, supervisor-access 51.0%, no-access 31.1%, P &lt; .001) and the lowest mask leakage (full-access 34.9%, supervisor-access 46.6%, no-access 61.6%; A to B: P &lt; .001, A to C: P &lt; .001, B to C: P = .003). Overall, group C achieved superior ventilation quality regarding primary and secondary outcome measures. The number of intubation attempts until success was lowest in the full-access group (full-access: 1.29, supervisor-access: 1.77, no-access: 2.43; A to B: P = .001, A to C: P &lt; .001, B to C: P = .015). Our findings confirm that direct visual access to feedback devices for supervisor and trainees alike considerably benefits outcomes and can contribute to the future of clinical education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-059839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37038898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Feedback ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Laryngoscopes ; Laryngoscopy ; Manikins ; Mechanical ventilation ; Pediatrics ; Respiration ; Respiratory function ; Supervisors ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2023-05, Vol.151 (5)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics May 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37038898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dvorsky, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rings, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roessler, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumer, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbauer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritschl, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmölzer, Georg M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werther, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn manikin. Participants were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (no-access), the feedback devices were not visible but recording. In group B (supervisor-access), the feedback devices were visible to the supervisor only. In group C (full-access), both the participant and the supervisor had visual access. The two main outcome variables were the percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (4-8mL/kg) and the number of intubation attempts. Group C achieved the highest percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (full-access 63.6%, supervisor-access 51.0%, no-access 31.1%, P &lt; .001) and the lowest mask leakage (full-access 34.9%, supervisor-access 46.6%, no-access 61.6%; A to B: P &lt; .001, A to C: P &lt; .001, B to C: P = .003). Overall, group C achieved superior ventilation quality regarding primary and secondary outcome measures. The number of intubation attempts until success was lowest in the full-access group (full-access: 1.29, supervisor-access: 1.77, no-access: 2.43; A to B: P = .001, A to C: P &lt; .001, B to C: P = .015). Our findings confirm that direct visual access to feedback devices for supervisor and trainees alike considerably benefits outcomes and can contribute to the future of clinical education.</description><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Laryngoscopes</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Respiratory function</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUnAi5fU2a9m11spVoWC0FY9LptkAqlJtmaTQ_31JqR68DQzzDMvw0PINYUplYLd7zH1UwaMhSC14vqEjCloFQoWyVMyBuA0FAByRC683wGAkBE7JyMeAVdKqzH5WKMtwm1eYvBSNW1sm9xVga3S4B2rJi-GeYmYxjb5fAjmwbpbujL_xjRYuKqpXVF07SYv2yO8adr0cEnOMlt4vDrWCXlbPm4Xz-Hq9ellMV-FCWdREzJpgevIaiVjEfNMz1KpbWQRlLTZLGEcERlXwBTVXM2kppIJmQrBM5kg8Am5G3L3tftq0TemzH2CRWErdK03LNJasVnEaYfe_kN3rq2r7jvTpQMDBbIPhIFKaud9jZnZ13lp64OhYHrpppdueulmkN6d3ByD27jE9O_g1zL_Abu0e_k</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Dvorsky, Robyn</creator><creator>Rings, Franziska</creator><creator>Bibl, Katharina</creator><creator>Roessler, Lisa</creator><creator>Kumer, Lisa</creator><creator>Steinbauer, Philipp</creator><creator>Schwarz, Hannah</creator><creator>Ritschl, Valentin</creator><creator>Schmölzer, Georg M</creator><creator>Berger, Angelika</creator><creator>Werther, Tobias</creator><creator>Wagner, Michael</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study</title><author>Dvorsky, Robyn ; Rings, Franziska ; Bibl, Katharina ; Roessler, Lisa ; Kumer, Lisa ; Steinbauer, Philipp ; Schwarz, Hannah ; Ritschl, Valentin ; Schmölzer, Georg M ; Berger, Angelika ; Werther, Tobias ; Wagner, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Laryngoscopes</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Respiratory function</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dvorsky, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rings, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibl, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roessler, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumer, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbauer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritschl, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmölzer, Georg M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werther, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dvorsky, Robyn</au><au>Rings, Franziska</au><au>Bibl, Katharina</au><au>Roessler, Lisa</au><au>Kumer, Lisa</au><au>Steinbauer, Philipp</au><au>Schwarz, Hannah</au><au>Ritschl, Valentin</au><au>Schmölzer, Georg M</au><au>Berger, Angelika</au><au>Werther, Tobias</au><au>Wagner, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn manikin. Participants were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (no-access), the feedback devices were not visible but recording. In group B (supervisor-access), the feedback devices were visible to the supervisor only. In group C (full-access), both the participant and the supervisor had visual access. The two main outcome variables were the percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (4-8mL/kg) and the number of intubation attempts. Group C achieved the highest percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (full-access 63.6%, supervisor-access 51.0%, no-access 31.1%, P &lt; .001) and the lowest mask leakage (full-access 34.9%, supervisor-access 46.6%, no-access 61.6%; A to B: P &lt; .001, A to C: P &lt; .001, B to C: P = .003). Overall, group C achieved superior ventilation quality regarding primary and secondary outcome measures. The number of intubation attempts until success was lowest in the full-access group (full-access: 1.29, supervisor-access: 1.77, no-access: 2.43; A to B: P = .001, A to C: P &lt; .001, B to C: P = .015). Our findings confirm that direct visual access to feedback devices for supervisor and trainees alike considerably benefits outcomes and can contribute to the future of clinical education.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>37038898</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2022-059839</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2023-05, Vol.151 (5)
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2799826731
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
subjects Feedback
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal
Laryngoscopes
Laryngoscopy
Manikins
Mechanical ventilation
Pediatrics
Respiration
Respiratory function
Supervisors
Ventilation
title Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-Time%20Intubation%20and%20Ventilation%20Feedback:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Simulation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Dvorsky,%20Robyn&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2022-059839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2810208050%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-25a0397a985b4b3f96d59a7ae085af6c23eee238028193865915245d443f5ce03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2810208050&rft_id=info:pmid/37038898&rfr_iscdi=true