Loading…

Successful liver transduction by re‐administration of different adeno‐associated virus vector serotypes in mice

Background Intravenous administration of adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising gene therapy approach for monogenic diseases. However, re‐administration of the same AAV serotype is impossible because of the induction of anti‐AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Here, we examined the feas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of gene medicine 2023-08, Vol.25 (8), p.e3505-n/a
Main Authors: Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar, Kashiwakura, Yuji, Hiramoto, Takafumi, Hayakawa, Morisada, Kamoshita, Nobuhiko, Ohmori, Tsukasa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page e3505
container_title The journal of gene medicine
container_volume 25
creator Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar
Kashiwakura, Yuji
Hiramoto, Takafumi
Hayakawa, Morisada
Kamoshita, Nobuhiko
Ohmori, Tsukasa
description Background Intravenous administration of adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising gene therapy approach for monogenic diseases. However, re‐administration of the same AAV serotype is impossible because of the induction of anti‐AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Here, we examined the feasibility of re‐administrating AAV vector serotypes different from the initial AAV vector serotype. Methods Liver‐targeting AAV3B, AAV5, and AAV8 vectors were intravenously injected in C57BL/6 mice, and the emergence of NAbs and the transduction efficacy following re‐administration were evaluated. Results For all serotypes, re‐administration of the same serotype was not possible. Although the highest neutralizing activity of NAb was induced by AAV5, anti‐AAV5 NAbs did not react with other serotypes, resulting in successful re‐administration with the other serotypes. AAV5 re‐administration was also successful in all mice treated with AAV3B and AAV8. Effective secondary administration of AAV3B and AAV8 was observed in most mice initially administrated AAV8 and AAV3B, respectively. However, few mice developed NAbs cross‐reacting with the other serotypes, especially those with close sequence homology. Conclusions In summary, AAV vector administration induced NAbs relatively specific to the administrated serotype. Secondary administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction could be successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes in mice. Systemic administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction induced high titer serotype‐specific neutralizing antibodies in mice. Here, the secondary administration was successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes. Considering the re‐administration of AAV vectors to patients who have failed to respond to initial gene therapy or lost therapeutic effect over time, the development of several AAV preparations is crucial for targeting one disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jgm.3505
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800620130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2844422143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdFqFTEQhoMotlbBJ5CAN95sO8kmu8mlFK1KixcqeLdkk4nksLs5ZnaPnDsfwWfsk7inrRYEr2aY-fgY5mfsuYBTASDPNt_G01qDfsCOhZaiklKrh2sP1lbKmq9H7AnRBkC0xtjH7KhubCsVmGNGnxbvkSguAx_SDgufi5soLH5OeeL9nhe8_vnLhTFNidbdzThHHlKMWHCauQs45QNDlH1yMwa-S2UhvkM_58IJS573WySeJj4mj0_Zo-gGwmd39YR9efvm8_m76vLjxfvz15eVV8rqymGvTR8aU0NTG-utk20AY6VpheutNtr10YA30WkXEfsQazBSto320flQn7BXt95tyd8XpLkbE3kcBjdhXqiTBqCRIGpY0Zf_oJu8lGm9bqWUUlIKVd8LfclEBWO3LWl0Zd8J6A5BdGsQ3SGIFX1xJ1z6EcNf8M_nV6C6BX6kAff_FXUfLq5uhL8B81eWDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844422143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful liver transduction by re‐administration of different adeno‐associated virus vector serotypes in mice</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar ; Kashiwakura, Yuji ; Hiramoto, Takafumi ; Hayakawa, Morisada ; Kamoshita, Nobuhiko ; Ohmori, Tsukasa</creator><creatorcontrib>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar ; Kashiwakura, Yuji ; Hiramoto, Takafumi ; Hayakawa, Morisada ; Kamoshita, Nobuhiko ; Ohmori, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><description>Background Intravenous administration of adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising gene therapy approach for monogenic diseases. However, re‐administration of the same AAV serotype is impossible because of the induction of anti‐AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Here, we examined the feasibility of re‐administrating AAV vector serotypes different from the initial AAV vector serotype. Methods Liver‐targeting AAV3B, AAV5, and AAV8 vectors were intravenously injected in C57BL/6 mice, and the emergence of NAbs and the transduction efficacy following re‐administration were evaluated. Results For all serotypes, re‐administration of the same serotype was not possible. Although the highest neutralizing activity of NAb was induced by AAV5, anti‐AAV5 NAbs did not react with other serotypes, resulting in successful re‐administration with the other serotypes. AAV5 re‐administration was also successful in all mice treated with AAV3B and AAV8. Effective secondary administration of AAV3B and AAV8 was observed in most mice initially administrated AAV8 and AAV3B, respectively. However, few mice developed NAbs cross‐reacting with the other serotypes, especially those with close sequence homology. Conclusions In summary, AAV vector administration induced NAbs relatively specific to the administrated serotype. Secondary administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction could be successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes in mice. Systemic administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction induced high titer serotype‐specific neutralizing antibodies in mice. Here, the secondary administration was successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes. Considering the re‐administration of AAV vectors to patients who have failed to respond to initial gene therapy or lost therapeutic effect over time, the development of several AAV preparations is crucial for targeting one disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-2254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36972408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Expression vectors ; Gene therapy ; genetic therapy ; Homology ; immune reaction ; Intravenous administration ; Liver ; neutralizing ; re‐administration ; Serotypes ; Transduction ; virus vector</subject><ispartof>The journal of gene medicine, 2023-08, Vol.25 (8), p.e3505-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36972408$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwakura, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiramoto, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Morisada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamoshita, Nobuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmori, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><title>Successful liver transduction by re‐administration of different adeno‐associated virus vector serotypes in mice</title><title>The journal of gene medicine</title><addtitle>J Gene Med</addtitle><description>Background Intravenous administration of adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising gene therapy approach for monogenic diseases. However, re‐administration of the same AAV serotype is impossible because of the induction of anti‐AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Here, we examined the feasibility of re‐administrating AAV vector serotypes different from the initial AAV vector serotype. Methods Liver‐targeting AAV3B, AAV5, and AAV8 vectors were intravenously injected in C57BL/6 mice, and the emergence of NAbs and the transduction efficacy following re‐administration were evaluated. Results For all serotypes, re‐administration of the same serotype was not possible. Although the highest neutralizing activity of NAb was induced by AAV5, anti‐AAV5 NAbs did not react with other serotypes, resulting in successful re‐administration with the other serotypes. AAV5 re‐administration was also successful in all mice treated with AAV3B and AAV8. Effective secondary administration of AAV3B and AAV8 was observed in most mice initially administrated AAV8 and AAV3B, respectively. However, few mice developed NAbs cross‐reacting with the other serotypes, especially those with close sequence homology. Conclusions In summary, AAV vector administration induced NAbs relatively specific to the administrated serotype. Secondary administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction could be successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes in mice. Systemic administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction induced high titer serotype‐specific neutralizing antibodies in mice. Here, the secondary administration was successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes. Considering the re‐administration of AAV vectors to patients who have failed to respond to initial gene therapy or lost therapeutic effect over time, the development of several AAV preparations is crucial for targeting one disease.</description><subject>Expression vectors</subject><subject>Gene therapy</subject><subject>genetic therapy</subject><subject>Homology</subject><subject>immune reaction</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>neutralizing</subject><subject>re‐administration</subject><subject>Serotypes</subject><subject>Transduction</subject><subject>virus vector</subject><issn>1099-498X</issn><issn>1521-2254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kdFqFTEQhoMotlbBJ5CAN95sO8kmu8mlFK1KixcqeLdkk4nksLs5ZnaPnDsfwWfsk7inrRYEr2aY-fgY5mfsuYBTASDPNt_G01qDfsCOhZaiklKrh2sP1lbKmq9H7AnRBkC0xtjH7KhubCsVmGNGnxbvkSguAx_SDgufi5soLH5OeeL9nhe8_vnLhTFNidbdzThHHlKMWHCauQs45QNDlH1yMwa-S2UhvkM_58IJS573WySeJj4mj0_Zo-gGwmd39YR9efvm8_m76vLjxfvz15eVV8rqymGvTR8aU0NTG-utk20AY6VpheutNtr10YA30WkXEfsQazBSto320flQn7BXt95tyd8XpLkbE3kcBjdhXqiTBqCRIGpY0Zf_oJu8lGm9bqWUUlIKVd8LfclEBWO3LWl0Zd8J6A5BdGsQ3SGIFX1xJ1z6EcNf8M_nV6C6BX6kAff_FXUfLq5uhL8B81eWDw</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar</creator><creator>Kashiwakura, Yuji</creator><creator>Hiramoto, Takafumi</creator><creator>Hayakawa, Morisada</creator><creator>Kamoshita, Nobuhiko</creator><creator>Ohmori, Tsukasa</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Successful liver transduction by re‐administration of different adeno‐associated virus vector serotypes in mice</title><author>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar ; Kashiwakura, Yuji ; Hiramoto, Takafumi ; Hayakawa, Morisada ; Kamoshita, Nobuhiko ; Ohmori, Tsukasa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Expression vectors</topic><topic>Gene therapy</topic><topic>genetic therapy</topic><topic>Homology</topic><topic>immune reaction</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>neutralizing</topic><topic>re‐administration</topic><topic>Serotypes</topic><topic>Transduction</topic><topic>virus vector</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwakura, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiramoto, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayakawa, Morisada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamoshita, Nobuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmori, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of gene medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baatartsogt, Nemekhbayar</au><au>Kashiwakura, Yuji</au><au>Hiramoto, Takafumi</au><au>Hayakawa, Morisada</au><au>Kamoshita, Nobuhiko</au><au>Ohmori, Tsukasa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful liver transduction by re‐administration of different adeno‐associated virus vector serotypes in mice</atitle><jtitle>The journal of gene medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Gene Med</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e3505</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e3505-n/a</pages><issn>1099-498X</issn><eissn>1521-2254</eissn><abstract>Background Intravenous administration of adeno‐associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising gene therapy approach for monogenic diseases. However, re‐administration of the same AAV serotype is impossible because of the induction of anti‐AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Here, we examined the feasibility of re‐administrating AAV vector serotypes different from the initial AAV vector serotype. Methods Liver‐targeting AAV3B, AAV5, and AAV8 vectors were intravenously injected in C57BL/6 mice, and the emergence of NAbs and the transduction efficacy following re‐administration were evaluated. Results For all serotypes, re‐administration of the same serotype was not possible. Although the highest neutralizing activity of NAb was induced by AAV5, anti‐AAV5 NAbs did not react with other serotypes, resulting in successful re‐administration with the other serotypes. AAV5 re‐administration was also successful in all mice treated with AAV3B and AAV8. Effective secondary administration of AAV3B and AAV8 was observed in most mice initially administrated AAV8 and AAV3B, respectively. However, few mice developed NAbs cross‐reacting with the other serotypes, especially those with close sequence homology. Conclusions In summary, AAV vector administration induced NAbs relatively specific to the administrated serotype. Secondary administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction could be successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes in mice. Systemic administration of AAVs targeting liver transduction induced high titer serotype‐specific neutralizing antibodies in mice. Here, the secondary administration was successfully achieved by switching AAV serotypes. Considering the re‐administration of AAV vectors to patients who have failed to respond to initial gene therapy or lost therapeutic effect over time, the development of several AAV preparations is crucial for targeting one disease.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>36972408</pmid><doi>10.1002/jgm.3505</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-498X
ispartof The journal of gene medicine, 2023-08, Vol.25 (8), p.e3505-n/a
issn 1099-498X
1521-2254
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800620130
source Wiley
subjects Expression vectors
Gene therapy
genetic therapy
Homology
immune reaction
Intravenous administration
Liver
neutralizing
re‐administration
Serotypes
Transduction
virus vector
title Successful liver transduction by re‐administration of different adeno‐associated virus vector serotypes in mice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A30%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20liver%20transduction%20by%20re%E2%80%90administration%20of%20different%20adeno%E2%80%90associated%20virus%20vector%20serotypes%20in%20mice&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20gene%20medicine&rft.au=Baatartsogt,%20Nemekhbayar&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e3505&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e3505-n/a&rft.issn=1099-498X&rft.eissn=1521-2254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgm.3505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844422143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4495-aeb58bd68306389c9a27d0892871ab9585abf80c8fa5afeebdf30822765cfacd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844422143&rft_id=info:pmid/36972408&rfr_iscdi=true