Loading…
Graft copolymerization of poly(styrene-co-p-choloromethylstyrene) with methyl methacrylate and acryloylmorpholine by atom transfer radical polymerization: Graft copolymer characterization and monomer reactivity ratios
Poly[styrene‐graft‐(acryloylmorpholine‐co‐methyl methacrylate)] graft copolymers in various compositions, poly(styrene‐graft‐acryloylmorpholine), and poly(styrene‐graft‐methyl methacrylate) were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐chloromethylstyrene) (62/38) as t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of polymer science. Part A, Polymer chemistry Polymer chemistry, 2005-09, Vol.43 (17), p.3771-3777 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Poly[styrene‐graft‐(acryloylmorpholine‐co‐methyl methacrylate)] graft copolymers in various compositions, poly(styrene‐graft‐acryloylmorpholine), and poly(styrene‐graft‐methyl methacrylate) were prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization with poly(styrene‐co‐p‐chloromethylstyrene) (62/38) as the macroinitiator in the presence of CuBr/1,2‐dipiperidinoethane at 130 °C in N,N‐dimethylformamide. The graft copolymers were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, 1H and 13C NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry. The thermal stabilities of the graft copolymers were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis. The monomer reactivity ratios in the graft copolymerization of acryloylmorpholine (r1) and methyl methacrylate (r2) were calculated by the application of linear methods, such as the Finemann–Ross, inverted Finemann–Ross, Yezrielev–Brokhina–Roskin, Kelen–Tüdos, and extended Kelen–Tüdos methods, and the Mayo–Lewis method, which uses an integrated copolymer equation in a terminal model of copolymerization. r1 was 1.13–2.11, and r2 was 0.49–1.05, according to the various methods. The Yezrielev–Brokhina–Roskin method gave the best linearity for the experimental results, and the r1 and r2 values were 1.28 and 0.54, respectively. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 3771–3777, 2005
In the atom transfer radical graft copolymerization of poly(styrene‐co‐p‐chloromethylstyrene) (62/38) with acryloylmorpholine (1) and methyl methacrylate (2), the monomer reactivity ratios were calculated with the Finemann–Ross (F–R), inverted Finemann–Ross (inverted F–R), Yezrielev–Brokhina–Roskin (Y–B–R), Kelen–Tüdos (K–T), extended Kelen–Tüdos (extended K–T), and Mayo–Lewis (M–L) methods. The Yezrielev–Brokhina–Roskin method gave the best linearity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-624X 1099-0518 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pola.20882 |