The Iatrogenic Injury Potential of Self-adherent, Elastic Bandages in Finger Injuries

• Published in: Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-10, Vol.19 (7), p.1138-1145
• Main Authors: Yu, Henry H., Nadeau, Jason, Powell, Jenna, Fox, Charles, Lauder, Alexander, Ipaktchi, Kyros
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Bandages - adverse effects; Compression Bandages - adverse effects; Female; Finger Injuries - physiopathology; Fingers - blood supply; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry; Male; Oximetry - methods; Regional Blood Flow - physiology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1558-9447; 1558-9455; 1558-9455
• DOI: 10.1177/15589447231160208

Background: The use of a self-adherent, elastic bandage is a practical way to dress finger injuries. Multiple reports describe iatrogenic injuries from elastic bandages, ranging from skin necrosis to finger gangrene, necessitating amputations. This study investigated whether elastic bandages can compromise digital perfusion by occluding arterial blood flow in healthy volunteers and evaluated the utility of pulse oximetry as a monitoring tool for digital perfusion. A technique for safe bandage application is proposed. Methods: A commercially available elastic bandage was wrapped around the index finger of 20 healthy volunteers at varying degrees of stretch. Digital perfusion measurements were carried out using photoelectric pulse transduction, laser Doppler flowmetry, and pulse oximetry. Intracompartmental pressure measurements were recorded using a separate in vitro experimental model. Results: Elastic bandages applied at maximum stretch did not change digital brachial index or pulse oximetry values, suggesting arterial blood flow was preserved distal to the bandage. Intracompartmental pressure measurements at maximum stretch remained below the systolic digital pressure. In contrast, superficial dermal perfusion fell to 32% of normal as measured by laser Doppler flow, at 100% bandage stretch. Conclusion: This study suggests a risk for iatrogenic injury when using elastic bandages for finger dressings. While arterial inflow was never compromised, pressures were high enough to occlude superficial venous outflow, which may begin at 20% bandage stretch. Pulse oximetry failed to detect changes distal to applied dressings, and we do not recommend it to detect digital vascular compromise in this setting.