Usefulness of Routine Bronchial Aspirate of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

• Published in: Archivos de bronconeumología (English ed.) 2023-07, Vol.59 (7), p.435-438
• Main Authors: Fernández-Arias, Carmen, Barrio-Herraiz, Eduard, Centeno-Clemente, Carmen, García-Olivé, Ignasi, Tazi-Mezalek, Rachid, Andreo-Garcia, Felipe, Abad-Capa, Jorge, Rosell-Gratacós, Antoni, Serra-Mitjà, Pere
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bronchi - diagnostic imaging; Bronchial aspirate; Bronchoscopy - methods; Cost; Cytology; EBUS; Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration - methods; Female; Humans; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging; Lymphadenopathy - pathology; Male; Microbiology; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 0300-2896; 1579-2129
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.03.020

[Display omitted] Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is commonly used for the study of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and centrally tumours but no report has discussed the contribution of routine cytological and microbiological BA during the procedure. The aim of the study was to analyse the diagnostic yield of BA during EBUS, and to determine the potential cost reduction. A prospective study of cytological and microbiological BA collected during EBUS-TBNA was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. Demographic data, indication, previous BA bronchoscopy or EBUS diagnosis were recorded. The main variable tested was the number of patients in which the result of the BA obtained through EBUS-TBNA determined a change in the diagnosis. A total of 450 (70.9% male) patients were included. BA cytology showed abnormal cells in 33 (7.3%) of patients, and only 1 case (0.2%) provided a previously unknown diagnosis. All these cases were patients with suspected malignancy. BA microbiological samples found germens in 30 (6.7%) patients but only in 5 cases (1.1%) found microbiological specimens not detected in previous bronchoscopy. None of them received antibiotics and evolved correctly. The potential total cost reduction during the study period at our centre if routine BA was deleted would be 21,937.50€ for routinely combined study. The low diagnostic yield of cytological and microbiological bronchial aspirate in EBUS-TBNA supports the idea of not performing routine BA. Although the potential for cost savings in caring for an individual patient is modest, many centres routinely perform BA, so the potential savings could be significant.