Loading…

Inter‐device concordance of Veggie Meter—A reflection spectroscopy to measure skin carotenoids

The Veggie Meter® (VM) is a refraction spectrometer that detects skin carotenoids. We tested the variability of the two modes (single‐scan and averaging modes) of four VMs of three different versions (VM‐1, 2, 3, 4) with 92 healthy volunteers. Both the modes exhibited a high intra‐class correlation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biophotonics 2023-08, Vol.16 (8), p.e202300071-n/a
Main Authors: Obana, Akira, Asaoka, Ryo, Takayanagi, Yuji, Gohto, Yuko
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Veggie Meter® (VM) is a refraction spectrometer that detects skin carotenoids. We tested the variability of the two modes (single‐scan and averaging modes) of four VMs of three different versions (VM‐1, 2, 3, 4) with 92 healthy volunteers. Both the modes exhibited a high intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC); however, the averaging mode had a significantly lower coefficient of variance than the single‐scan mode. The Bland–Altman analysis showed a systematic error between VM‐1 and other three VMs. The actual errors between the VM‐1 and the other three VMs in the averaging mode were 7.4%, 10.4%, and 11.8% of the median of VM scores, but the errors could be reduced to 2.8%, 6.3%, and 7.0% by compensating VM scores using the regression equations. Averaging mode had higher accuracy than single‐scan mode. The reliability of the VMs was validated by the small coefficient of variation and high ICC. The error was improved using linear regression compensation. The Veggie Meter® (VM), a reflection spectroscopy to measure skin carotenoids, can assess vegetable intake very easily. We validated four VMs of three different versions and found them to be highly reliable. We proposed regression equations to further reduce inter‐device errors.
ISSN:1864-063X
1864-0648
DOI:10.1002/jbio.202300071