Increased pituitary volumes in patients with Sanfilippo syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type 3, MPS III)

• Published in: Neuroradiology 2023-09, Vol.65 (9), p.1381-1386
• Main Authors: Huang, Shiwei, Beatty, Zachary J., Mckinney, Alexander M., Nascene, David R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Convexity; Disease; Enzymes; Females; Genetic disorders; Heparan sulfate; Imaging; Males; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Metabolic disorders; Mucopolysaccharidosis; Neurology; Neuroradiology; Neurosciences; Neurosurgery; Paediatric Neuroradiology; Patients; Pituitary (anterior); Pituitary (posterior); Pituitary gland; Quality; Radiology; Statistical analysis; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 0028-3940; 1432-1920
• DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03157-2

Purpose To evaluate apparent pituitary gland enlargement in patients with Sanfilippo syndrome observed at our institution. Methods Twelve patients with Sanfilippo syndrome with brain MRI were studied. Anterior, posterior, and whole pituitary volumes were estimated using the prolate ellipsoid volume calculation method (π/6 × L × W × H). Convexity along the upper pituitary margin (Elster’s grade) was also measured. These values were compared to two age- and sex-matched groups (normal controls and patients with Hurler syndrome) using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. Results In the Sanfilippo cohort, the mean whole pituitary volume was 529.9 mm, the mean anterior pituitary volume was 333.4 mm, and the mean posterior pituitary volume was 59.1 mm with Elster’s grade of 4.2. In the control cohort, the mean whole pituitary volume was 217.4 mm, the mean anterior pituitary volume was 154.8 mm, and the mean posterior pituitary volume was 28.4 mm with Elster’s grade of 2.5. In the Hurler syndrome cohort, the mean whole pituitary volume was 310.0 mm, the mean anterior pituitary volume was 178.2 mm, and the mean posterior pituitary volume was 35.4 mm with Elster’s grade of 3.5. Conclusion In our cohort of patients with Sanfilippo syndrome, whole, anterior, and posterior pituitary volumes and degree of convexity along the upper pituitary border were all significantly greater than controls. The cause of these morphological changes is unclear, as is clinical correlation of the findings.