Environmental quality mediates the ecological dominance of cooperatively breeding birds

• Published in: Ecology letters 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1145-1156
• Main Authors: Lin, Yu‐Heng, Chen, Ying‐Yu, Rubenstein, Dustin R., Liu, Ming, Liu, Mark, Shen, Sheng‐Feng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal breeding; Animals; Birds; Breeding; Climate change; Communal breeding; Comparative analysis; cooperation; cooperative breeding; Dominance; ecological consequences; Ecology; Environmental quality; Phylogeny; Predictions; range size; Social interactions; sociality; Species; species distribution
• ISSN: 1461-023X; 1461-0248
• DOI: 10.1111/ele.14226

Although social species as diverse as humans and ants are among the most abundant organisms on Earth, animals cooperate and form groups for many reasons. How these different reasons for grouping affect a species' ecological dominance remains unknown. Here we use a theoretical model to demonstrate that the different fitness benefits that animals receive by forming groups depend on the quality of their environment, which in turn impacts their ecological dominance and resilience to global change. We then test the model's key predictions using phylogenetic comparative analysis of >6500 bird species. As predicted, we find that cooperative breeders occurring in harsh and fluctuating environments have larger ranges and greater abundances than non‐cooperative breeders, but cooperative breeders occurring in benign and stable environments do not. Using our model, we further show that social species living in harsh and fluctuating environments will be less vulnerable to climate change than non‐social species. Using a simulation model and comparative phylogenetic analysis of over 6500 bird species, we find that cooperative breeders occurring in harsh/fluctuating environments have larger ranges and greater abundances than non‐cooperative breeders, but not those occurring in benign/stable environments. We further show in the simulation that social species living in harsh/fluctuating environments will be less vulnerable to climate change than non‐social species.