Loading…

Predicting ecological outcomes using fuzzy interaction webs

The past 100 years of empirical research in ecology have generated tremendous knowledge about the component interactions that structure ecological communities. Yet, we still lack the ability to reassemble these puzzle pieces to predict community responses to perturbations, a challenge that grows inc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 2023-07, Vol.104 (7), p.e4072-n/a
Main Authors: Pearson, Dean E., Clark‐Wolf, T. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e4072
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 104
creator Pearson, Dean E.
Clark‐Wolf, T. J.
description The past 100 years of empirical research in ecology have generated tremendous knowledge about the component interactions that structure ecological communities. Yet, we still lack the ability to reassemble these puzzle pieces to predict community responses to perturbations, a challenge that grows increasingly urgent given rapid global change. We summarize key advances in community ecology that have set the stage for modeling ecological systems and briefly review the evolution of ecological modeling efforts to identify critical hurdles to progress. We find that while Robert May demonstrated that quantitative models could theoretically predict community interactions nearly 50 years ago, in practice, we still lack the ability to predict ecological outcomes with reasonable accuracy for three reasons: (1) quantitative models require precise data for parameterization (often unavailable) and have restrictive assumptions that are rarely met; (2) estimating interaction strengths for all network components is extremely challenging; and (3) determining which species are essential to include in models is difficult (model structure uncertainty). We propose that fuzzy interaction webs (FIW), borrowed from the social sciences, hold the potential to overcome these modeling shortfalls by integrating quantitative and qualitative data (e.g., categorical data, natural history information, expert opinion) for generating reasonably accurate qualitative predictions sufficient for addressing many ecological questions. We outline recent advances developed for addressing model structure uncertainty, and we present a case study to illustrate how FIWs can be applied for estimating community interaction strengths and predicting complex ecological outcomes in a multitrophic (plants, herbivores, predators), multi‐interaction‐type (competition, predation, facilitation, omnivory) grassland ecosystem. We argue that incorporating FIWs into ecological modeling could significantly advance empirical and theoretical ecology.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.4072
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2808587055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2832226701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQQIMotlbBXyALXrxsnSTNJsGTlPoBgh704Cns5qNs2d3UpEvZ_nq3tioIzmUO83gMD6FzDGMMQK6t7sYT4OQADbGkMpWYwyEaAmCSyoyJATqJcQH94Ik4RgPKMREcZ0N08xKsKfWqbOaJ1b7y81LnVeLblfa1jUkbtxfXbjZdUjYrG_Ke9U2ytkU8RUcur6I92-8RerubvU4f0qfn-8fp7VOq6USSlGgglIEsiDOOO46NkCCzgvJMMwrE5pYxZ4RgUsq8oBm3BTGAjdGOCQF0hK523mXwH62NK1WXUduqyhvr26iIAMEEB8Z69PIPuvBtaPrveooSQjIO-Feog48xWKeWoazz0CkMahtU9UHVNmiPXuyFbVFb8wN-F-yBdAesy8p2_4rUbPr-JfwE5b59mQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2832226701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting ecological outcomes using fuzzy interaction webs</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pearson, Dean E. ; Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Dean E. ; Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The past 100 years of empirical research in ecology have generated tremendous knowledge about the component interactions that structure ecological communities. Yet, we still lack the ability to reassemble these puzzle pieces to predict community responses to perturbations, a challenge that grows increasingly urgent given rapid global change. We summarize key advances in community ecology that have set the stage for modeling ecological systems and briefly review the evolution of ecological modeling efforts to identify critical hurdles to progress. We find that while Robert May demonstrated that quantitative models could theoretically predict community interactions nearly 50 years ago, in practice, we still lack the ability to predict ecological outcomes with reasonable accuracy for three reasons: (1) quantitative models require precise data for parameterization (often unavailable) and have restrictive assumptions that are rarely met; (2) estimating interaction strengths for all network components is extremely challenging; and (3) determining which species are essential to include in models is difficult (model structure uncertainty). We propose that fuzzy interaction webs (FIW), borrowed from the social sciences, hold the potential to overcome these modeling shortfalls by integrating quantitative and qualitative data (e.g., categorical data, natural history information, expert opinion) for generating reasonably accurate qualitative predictions sufficient for addressing many ecological questions. We outline recent advances developed for addressing model structure uncertainty, and we present a case study to illustrate how FIWs can be applied for estimating community interaction strengths and predicting complex ecological outcomes in a multitrophic (plants, herbivores, predators), multi‐interaction‐type (competition, predation, facilitation, omnivory) grassland ecosystem. We argue that incorporating FIWs into ecological modeling could significantly advance empirical and theoretical ecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.4072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37128716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biota ; Community ecology ; community interaction web ; ecological modeling ; Ecological models ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Food Chain ; fuzzy cognitive map ; fuzzy cognitive web ; fuzzy set theory ; Grasslands ; Herbivores ; interaction strength ; Modelling ; Models, Theoretical ; Natural history ; network ; Parameterization ; Perturbation ; Plants ; Predation ; Predators ; prediction ; Qualitative analysis ; qualitative models ; Social sciences ; Uncertainty ; Webs</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2023-07, Vol.104 (7), p.e4072-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Ecological Society of America. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2023 The Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0115-3482</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting ecological outcomes using fuzzy interaction webs</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The past 100 years of empirical research in ecology have generated tremendous knowledge about the component interactions that structure ecological communities. Yet, we still lack the ability to reassemble these puzzle pieces to predict community responses to perturbations, a challenge that grows increasingly urgent given rapid global change. We summarize key advances in community ecology that have set the stage for modeling ecological systems and briefly review the evolution of ecological modeling efforts to identify critical hurdles to progress. We find that while Robert May demonstrated that quantitative models could theoretically predict community interactions nearly 50 years ago, in practice, we still lack the ability to predict ecological outcomes with reasonable accuracy for three reasons: (1) quantitative models require precise data for parameterization (often unavailable) and have restrictive assumptions that are rarely met; (2) estimating interaction strengths for all network components is extremely challenging; and (3) determining which species are essential to include in models is difficult (model structure uncertainty). We propose that fuzzy interaction webs (FIW), borrowed from the social sciences, hold the potential to overcome these modeling shortfalls by integrating quantitative and qualitative data (e.g., categorical data, natural history information, expert opinion) for generating reasonably accurate qualitative predictions sufficient for addressing many ecological questions. We outline recent advances developed for addressing model structure uncertainty, and we present a case study to illustrate how FIWs can be applied for estimating community interaction strengths and predicting complex ecological outcomes in a multitrophic (plants, herbivores, predators), multi‐interaction‐type (competition, predation, facilitation, omnivory) grassland ecosystem. We argue that incorporating FIWs into ecological modeling could significantly advance empirical and theoretical ecology.</description><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>community interaction web</subject><subject>ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecological models</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>fuzzy cognitive map</subject><subject>fuzzy cognitive web</subject><subject>fuzzy set theory</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>interaction strength</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>network</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>qualitative models</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Webs</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQQIMotlbBXyALXrxsnSTNJsGTlPoBgh704Cns5qNs2d3UpEvZ_nq3tioIzmUO83gMD6FzDGMMQK6t7sYT4OQADbGkMpWYwyEaAmCSyoyJATqJcQH94Ik4RgPKMREcZ0N08xKsKfWqbOaJ1b7y81LnVeLblfa1jUkbtxfXbjZdUjYrG_Ke9U2ytkU8RUcur6I92-8RerubvU4f0qfn-8fp7VOq6USSlGgglIEsiDOOO46NkCCzgvJMMwrE5pYxZ4RgUsq8oBm3BTGAjdGOCQF0hK523mXwH62NK1WXUduqyhvr26iIAMEEB8Z69PIPuvBtaPrveooSQjIO-Feog48xWKeWoazz0CkMahtU9UHVNmiPXuyFbVFb8wN-F-yBdAesy8p2_4rUbPr-JfwE5b59mQ</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Pearson, Dean E.</creator><creator>Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-3482</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Predicting ecological outcomes using fuzzy interaction webs</title><author>Pearson, Dean E. ; Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>community interaction web</topic><topic>ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecological models</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>fuzzy cognitive map</topic><topic>fuzzy cognitive web</topic><topic>fuzzy set theory</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>interaction strength</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>network</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>qualitative models</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Webs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, Dean E.</au><au>Clark‐Wolf, T. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting ecological outcomes using fuzzy interaction webs</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e4072</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e4072-n/a</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>The past 100 years of empirical research in ecology have generated tremendous knowledge about the component interactions that structure ecological communities. Yet, we still lack the ability to reassemble these puzzle pieces to predict community responses to perturbations, a challenge that grows increasingly urgent given rapid global change. We summarize key advances in community ecology that have set the stage for modeling ecological systems and briefly review the evolution of ecological modeling efforts to identify critical hurdles to progress. We find that while Robert May demonstrated that quantitative models could theoretically predict community interactions nearly 50 years ago, in practice, we still lack the ability to predict ecological outcomes with reasonable accuracy for three reasons: (1) quantitative models require precise data for parameterization (often unavailable) and have restrictive assumptions that are rarely met; (2) estimating interaction strengths for all network components is extremely challenging; and (3) determining which species are essential to include in models is difficult (model structure uncertainty). We propose that fuzzy interaction webs (FIW), borrowed from the social sciences, hold the potential to overcome these modeling shortfalls by integrating quantitative and qualitative data (e.g., categorical data, natural history information, expert opinion) for generating reasonably accurate qualitative predictions sufficient for addressing many ecological questions. We outline recent advances developed for addressing model structure uncertainty, and we present a case study to illustrate how FIWs can be applied for estimating community interaction strengths and predicting complex ecological outcomes in a multitrophic (plants, herbivores, predators), multi‐interaction‐type (competition, predation, facilitation, omnivory) grassland ecosystem. We argue that incorporating FIWs into ecological modeling could significantly advance empirical and theoretical ecology.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37128716</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.4072</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-3482</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2023-07, Vol.104 (7), p.e4072-n/a
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2808587055
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Biota
Community ecology
community interaction web
ecological modeling
Ecological models
Ecology
Ecosystem
Food Chain
fuzzy cognitive map
fuzzy cognitive web
fuzzy set theory
Grasslands
Herbivores
interaction strength
Modelling
Models, Theoretical
Natural history
network
Parameterization
Perturbation
Plants
Predation
Predators
prediction
Qualitative analysis
qualitative models
Social sciences
Uncertainty
Webs
title Predicting ecological outcomes using fuzzy interaction webs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20ecological%20outcomes%20using%20fuzzy%20interaction%20webs&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Pearson,%20Dean%20E.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e4072&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e4072-n/a&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.4072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2832226701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-2c023509b2fdf7f71d89096b376c5302eae55fd885999ab367eb2d01ddcf58803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2832226701&rft_id=info:pmid/37128716&rfr_iscdi=true