Construction Engineering Management Educators: History and Deteriorating Community

• Published in: Journal of construction engineering and management 2004-09, Vol.130 (5), p.751-758
• Main Authors: Chinowsky, Paul S, Diekmann, James E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Buildings. Public works; Exact sciences and technology; General aspects; Miscellaneous; Occupational training. Personnel. Work management; TECHNICAL PAPERS
• ISSN: 0733-9364; 1943-7862
• DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:5(751)

The history of construction engineering and management education closely follows the emergence of the construction industry as an economic force in the United States. The initial introduction of programs in the post-World War II era was followed by specialization and the introduction of graduate construction specialties in the early 1960s. However, the lack of qualified individuals was recognized as a factor in successfully developing the construction engineering management (CEM) focus as an academic discipline. Today, that concern continues as CEM programs in the United States find themselves under attack by academic colleagues for issues such as lack of qualified faculty candidates and lack of funding opportunities. This paper addresses the status of the construction academic community by examining the common history of the CEM faculty through a genealogical approach, the historical research record through an examination of the publication record, and the questions that face a community that has appeared to slip from its intellectual peak.