Loading…
Associating Peritoneal Metastasis With T2‐Weighted MRI Images in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using Deep Learning and Radiomics: A Multicenter Study
Background The preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is challenging and can impact clinical decision‐making. Purpose To investigate the performance of T2‐weighted (T2W) MRI‐based deep learning (DL) and radiomics methods for PM evaluation in EOC patie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2024-01, Vol.59 (1), p.122-131 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is challenging and can impact clinical decision‐making.
Purpose
To investigate the performance of T2‐weighted (T2W) MRI‐based deep learning (DL) and radiomics methods for PM evaluation in EOC patients.
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Four hundred seventy‐nine patients from five centers, including one training set (N = 297 [mean, 54.87 years]), one internal validation set (N = 75 [mean, 56.67 years]), and two external validation sets (N = 53 [mean, 55.58 years] and N = 54 [mean, 58.22 years]).
Field Strength/Sequence
1.5 or 3 T/fat‐suppression T2W fast or turbo spin‐echo sequence.
Assessment
ResNet‐50 was used as the architecture of DL. The largest orthogonal slices of the tumor area, radiomics features, and clinical characteristics were used to construct the DL, radiomics, and clinical models, respectively. The three models were combined using decision‐level fusion to create an ensemble model. Diagnostic performances of radiologists and radiology residents with and without model assistance were evaluated.
Statistical Tests
Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the performances of models. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity. A two‐tailed P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.28761 |