A comprehensive approach to quantify the source identification and human health risk assessment of toxic elements in park dust

• Published in: Environmental geochemistry and health 2023-08, Vol.45 (8), p.5813-5827
• Main Authors: Huang, Chang-Chen, Cai, Li-Mei, Xu, Yao-Hui, Jie, Luo, Hu, Guo-Cheng, Chen, Lai-Guo, Wang, Han-Zhi, Xu, Xu-Bang, Mei, Jing-Xian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aging (natural); Atmospheric particulates; Bioavailability; Cadmium; Carcinogens; Chemical speciation; Chromium; Contamination; Copper; Correlation analysis; Dust; Earth and Environmental Science; Environment; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental Health; Geochemistry; Health risk assessment; Health risks; Lead; Original Paper; Pollutant load; Pollution; Pollution index; Pollution load; Public Health; Risk assessment; Soil Science & Conservation; Speciation; Terrestrial Pollution; Zinc
• ISSN: 0269-4042; 1573-2983
• DOI: 10.1007/s10653-023-01588-7

In this research, enrichment factor (EF) and pollution load index were utilized to explore the contamination characteristics of toxic elements (TEs) in park dust. The results exhibited that park dust in the study area was mainly moderately polluted, and the EF values of dust Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Sb were all > 1. The concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn and Pb increased with the decrease of dust particle size. The investigation results of chemical speciation and bioavailability of TEs showed that Zn had the highest bioavailability. Three sources of TEs were determined by positive matrix factorization model, Pearson correlation analysis and geostatistical analysis, comprising factor 1 mixed sources of industrial and transportation activities (46.62%), factor 2 natural source (25.56%) and factor 3 mixed source of agricultural activities and the aging of park infrastructures (27.82%). Potential ecological risk (PER) and human health risk (HHR) models based on source apportionment were exploited to estimate PER and HHR of TEs from different sources. The mean PER value of TEs in the park dust was 114, indicating that ecological risk in the study area was relatively high. Factor 1 contributed the most to PER, and the pollution of Cd was the most serious. There were no significant carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks for children and adults in the study area. And factor 3 was the biggest source of non-carcinogenic risk, and As, Cr and Pb were the chief contributor to non-carcinogenic risk. The primary source of carcinogenic risk was factor 2, and Cr was the cardinal cancer risk element.