Loading…

Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review

Objectives Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PharmacoEconomics 2023-08, Vol.41 (8), p.869-911
Main Authors: Van Remoortel, Hans, Scheers, Hans, Avau, Bert, Georgsen, Jørgen, Nahirniak, Susan, Shehata, Nadine, Stanworth, Simon J., De Buck, Emmy, Compernolle, Veerle, Vandekerckhove, Philippe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-444a335ee202ed12247ff543349830f6f2d194d8ea0ee85f18344091ae569ef63
container_end_page 911
container_issue 8
container_start_page 869
container_title PharmacoEconomics
container_volume 41
creator Van Remoortel, Hans
Scheers, Hans
Avau, Bert
Georgsen, Jørgen
Nahirniak, Susan
Shehata, Nadine
Stanworth, Simon J.
De Buck, Emmy
Compernolle, Veerle
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
description Objectives Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods Eight databases and registries were searched for full economic evaluations (EEs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were synthesized as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY) or as cost per health outcome (e.g. bleeding event avoided). Included studies were critically appraised using the Philips reporting checklist. Results Eighteen evaluations from nine different countries were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics compared with no TPO, watch-and-rescue therapy, the standard of care, rituximab, splenectomy or platelet transfusion. ICERs varied from a dominant strategy (i.e. cost-saving and more effective), to an incremental cost per QALY/health outcome of EUR 25,000–50,000, EUR 75,000–750,000 and EUR > 1 million, to a dominated strategy (cost-increasing and less effective). Few evaluations ( n = 2, 10%) addressed the four principal types of uncertainty (methodological, structural, heterogeneity and parameter). Parameter uncertainty was most frequently reported (80%), followed by heterogeneity (45%), structural uncertainty (43%) and methodological uncertainty (28%). Conclusions Cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics in adult patients with thrombocytopenia ranged from a dominant strategy to a significant incremental cost per QALY/health outcome or a strategy that is clinically inferior and has increased costs. Future validation and tackling the uncertainty of these models with country-specific cost data and up-to-date efficacy and safety data are needed to increase the generalizability.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810923221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A756012997</galeid><sourcerecordid>A756012997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-444a335ee202ed12247ff543349830f6f2d194d8ea0ee85f18344091ae569ef63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LXDEQhoNY1Nr-AS_kgDe9OTZf5-Skd8tiP8DS0trrEHMmGtmTbJPsLvvvO7paaSklhBkyzzvM5CXkhNFzRql6WyTlSrSU42VcsXazR44YU7rlWNh_yGmrek0PyctS7iilvVD8gBwKxWTHNTsi4zyV2l54D66GNUQopUm-ubrNabpOyxSghth8DhNGVxrMv9oaINbSbEK9fQLdtqYlxGDfNbPm-7ZUmBBzzTdYB9i8Ii-8XRR4_RiPyY_3F1fzj-3llw-f5rPL1gktaiultEJ0ADg-jIxzqbzvpBBSD4L63vORaTkOYCnA0Hk2CCmpZha6XoPvxTF5s-u7zOnnCko1UygOFgsbIa2K4QOjmgvOGaJnf6F3aZUjToeUkB0VSspn6sYuwIToU83W3Tc1M9X1-OtaK6TO_0HhGWEKLkXwAd__EPCdwOVUSgZvljlMNm8No-beWrOz1qC15sFas0HR6ePEq-sJxt-SJy8REDugYCneQH5e6T9tfwGOMK05</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2834503744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Van Remoortel, Hans ; Scheers, Hans ; Avau, Bert ; Georgsen, Jørgen ; Nahirniak, Susan ; Shehata, Nadine ; Stanworth, Simon J. ; De Buck, Emmy ; Compernolle, Veerle ; Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Remoortel, Hans ; Scheers, Hans ; Avau, Bert ; Georgsen, Jørgen ; Nahirniak, Susan ; Shehata, Nadine ; Stanworth, Simon J. ; De Buck, Emmy ; Compernolle, Veerle ; Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods Eight databases and registries were searched for full economic evaluations (EEs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were synthesized as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY) or as cost per health outcome (e.g. bleeding event avoided). Included studies were critically appraised using the Philips reporting checklist. Results Eighteen evaluations from nine different countries were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics compared with no TPO, watch-and-rescue therapy, the standard of care, rituximab, splenectomy or platelet transfusion. ICERs varied from a dominant strategy (i.e. cost-saving and more effective), to an incremental cost per QALY/health outcome of EUR 25,000–50,000, EUR 75,000–750,000 and EUR &gt; 1 million, to a dominated strategy (cost-increasing and less effective). Few evaluations ( n = 2, 10%) addressed the four principal types of uncertainty (methodological, structural, heterogeneity and parameter). Parameter uncertainty was most frequently reported (80%), followed by heterogeneity (45%), structural uncertainty (43%) and methodological uncertainty (28%). Conclusions Cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics in adult patients with thrombocytopenia ranged from a dominant strategy to a significant incremental cost per QALY/health outcome or a strategy that is clinically inferior and has increased costs. Future validation and tackling the uncertainty of these models with country-specific cost data and up-to-date efficacy and safety data are needed to increase the generalizability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1170-7690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-2027</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37145291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood platelets ; Bone marrow ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Cost analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Evaluation ; Health Administration ; Health Economics ; Health technology assessment ; Hemorrhage ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive agents ; Internet resources ; Medical care, Cost of ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Patient outcomes ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Public Health ; Quality of Life Research ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Standard of care ; Steroids ; Systematic Review ; Thrombocytopenia ; Thrombocytopenia - drug therapy ; Thrombopoietin - therapeutic use ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>PharmacoEconomics, 2023-08, Vol.41 (8), p.869-911</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Aug 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-444a335ee202ed12247ff543349830f6f2d194d8ea0ee85f18344091ae569ef63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1942-1799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2834503744/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2834503744?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Remoortel, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheers, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avau, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgsen, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahirniak, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shehata, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanworth, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buck, Emmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compernolle, Veerle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review</title><title>PharmacoEconomics</title><addtitle>PharmacoEconomics</addtitle><addtitle>Pharmacoeconomics</addtitle><description>Objectives Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods Eight databases and registries were searched for full economic evaluations (EEs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were synthesized as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY) or as cost per health outcome (e.g. bleeding event avoided). Included studies were critically appraised using the Philips reporting checklist. Results Eighteen evaluations from nine different countries were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics compared with no TPO, watch-and-rescue therapy, the standard of care, rituximab, splenectomy or platelet transfusion. ICERs varied from a dominant strategy (i.e. cost-saving and more effective), to an incremental cost per QALY/health outcome of EUR 25,000–50,000, EUR 75,000–750,000 and EUR &gt; 1 million, to a dominated strategy (cost-increasing and less effective). Few evaluations ( n = 2, 10%) addressed the four principal types of uncertainty (methodological, structural, heterogeneity and parameter). Parameter uncertainty was most frequently reported (80%), followed by heterogeneity (45%), structural uncertainty (43%) and methodological uncertainty (28%). Conclusions Cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics in adult patients with thrombocytopenia ranged from a dominant strategy to a significant incremental cost per QALY/health outcome or a strategy that is clinically inferior and has increased costs. Future validation and tackling the uncertainty of these models with country-specific cost data and up-to-date efficacy and safety data are needed to increase the generalizability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood platelets</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health Administration</subject><subject>Health Economics</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive agents</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Medical care, Cost of</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Standard of care</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Thrombocytopenia</subject><subject>Thrombocytopenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Thrombopoietin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>1170-7690</issn><issn>1179-2027</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LXDEQhoNY1Nr-AS_kgDe9OTZf5-Skd8tiP8DS0trrEHMmGtmTbJPsLvvvO7paaSklhBkyzzvM5CXkhNFzRql6WyTlSrSU42VcsXazR44YU7rlWNh_yGmrek0PyctS7iilvVD8gBwKxWTHNTsi4zyV2l54D66GNUQopUm-ubrNabpOyxSghth8DhNGVxrMv9oaINbSbEK9fQLdtqYlxGDfNbPm-7ZUmBBzzTdYB9i8Ii-8XRR4_RiPyY_3F1fzj-3llw-f5rPL1gktaiultEJ0ADg-jIxzqbzvpBBSD4L63vORaTkOYCnA0Hk2CCmpZha6XoPvxTF5s-u7zOnnCko1UygOFgsbIa2K4QOjmgvOGaJnf6F3aZUjToeUkB0VSspn6sYuwIToU83W3Tc1M9X1-OtaK6TO_0HhGWEKLkXwAd__EPCdwOVUSgZvljlMNm8No-beWrOz1qC15sFas0HR6ePEq-sJxt-SJy8REDugYCneQH5e6T9tfwGOMK05</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Van Remoortel, Hans</creator><creator>Scheers, Hans</creator><creator>Avau, Bert</creator><creator>Georgsen, Jørgen</creator><creator>Nahirniak, Susan</creator><creator>Shehata, Nadine</creator><creator>Stanworth, Simon J.</creator><creator>De Buck, Emmy</creator><creator>Compernolle, Veerle</creator><creator>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1942-1799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review</title><author>Van Remoortel, Hans ; Scheers, Hans ; Avau, Bert ; Georgsen, Jørgen ; Nahirniak, Susan ; Shehata, Nadine ; Stanworth, Simon J. ; De Buck, Emmy ; Compernolle, Veerle ; Vandekerckhove, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-444a335ee202ed12247ff543349830f6f2d194d8ea0ee85f18344091ae569ef63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood platelets</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health Administration</topic><topic>Health Economics</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive agents</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Medical care, Cost of</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Standard of care</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Thrombocytopenia</topic><topic>Thrombocytopenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Thrombopoietin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Remoortel, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheers, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avau, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgsen, Jørgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahirniak, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shehata, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanworth, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buck, Emmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compernolle, Veerle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>PharmacoEconomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Remoortel, Hans</au><au>Scheers, Hans</au><au>Avau, Bert</au><au>Georgsen, Jørgen</au><au>Nahirniak, Susan</au><au>Shehata, Nadine</au><au>Stanworth, Simon J.</au><au>De Buck, Emmy</au><au>Compernolle, Veerle</au><au>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>PharmacoEconomics</jtitle><stitle>PharmacoEconomics</stitle><addtitle>Pharmacoeconomics</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>869</spage><epage>911</epage><pages>869-911</pages><issn>1170-7690</issn><eissn>1179-2027</eissn><abstract>Objectives Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods Eight databases and registries were searched for full economic evaluations (EEs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were synthesized as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY) or as cost per health outcome (e.g. bleeding event avoided). Included studies were critically appraised using the Philips reporting checklist. Results Eighteen evaluations from nine different countries were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics compared with no TPO, watch-and-rescue therapy, the standard of care, rituximab, splenectomy or platelet transfusion. ICERs varied from a dominant strategy (i.e. cost-saving and more effective), to an incremental cost per QALY/health outcome of EUR 25,000–50,000, EUR 75,000–750,000 and EUR &gt; 1 million, to a dominated strategy (cost-increasing and less effective). Few evaluations ( n = 2, 10%) addressed the four principal types of uncertainty (methodological, structural, heterogeneity and parameter). Parameter uncertainty was most frequently reported (80%), followed by heterogeneity (45%), structural uncertainty (43%) and methodological uncertainty (28%). Conclusions Cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics in adult patients with thrombocytopenia ranged from a dominant strategy to a significant incremental cost per QALY/health outcome or a strategy that is clinically inferior and has increased costs. Future validation and tackling the uncertainty of these models with country-specific cost data and up-to-date efficacy and safety data are needed to increase the generalizability.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37145291</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w</doi><tpages>43</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1942-1799</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1170-7690
ispartof PharmacoEconomics, 2023-08, Vol.41 (8), p.869-911
issn 1170-7690
1179-2027
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810923221
source Nexis UK; ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature
subjects Adult
Blood platelets
Bone marrow
Care and treatment
Clinical trials
Cost analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Evaluation
Health Administration
Health Economics
Health technology assessment
Hemorrhage
Heterogeneity
Humans
Immunosuppressive agents
Internet resources
Medical care, Cost of
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Patient outcomes
Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
Public Health
Quality of Life Research
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Standard of care
Steroids
Systematic Review
Thrombocytopenia
Thrombocytopenia - drug therapy
Thrombopoietin - therapeutic use
Transfusion
title Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A43%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20of%20Thrombopoietin%20Mimetics%20in%20Patients%20with%20Thrombocytopenia:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=PharmacoEconomics&rft.au=Van%20Remoortel,%20Hans&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=869&rft.epage=911&rft.pages=869-911&rft.issn=1170-7690&rft.eissn=1179-2027&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA756012997%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-444a335ee202ed12247ff543349830f6f2d194d8ea0ee85f18344091ae569ef63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2834503744&rft_id=info:pmid/37145291&rft_galeid=A756012997&rfr_iscdi=true