Loading…

Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection – Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection after revision hip and knee arthroplasties can lead to subsequent massive femoral bone loss. In these cases, resection of the residual femur and placement of an antibiotic total femoral spacer can be an option to salvage the limb. This is a single-center retros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2023-10, Vol.38 (10), p.2171-2176
Main Authors: Theil, Christoph, Moellenbeck, Burkhard, Puetzler, Jan, Klingebiel, Sebastian, Schwarze, Jan, Gosheger, Georg
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953
container_end_page 2176
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2171
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 38
creator Theil, Christoph
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Puetzler, Jan
Klingebiel, Sebastian
Schwarze, Jan
Gosheger, Georg
description Chronic periprosthetic joint infection after revision hip and knee arthroplasties can lead to subsequent massive femoral bone loss. In these cases, resection of the residual femur and placement of an antibiotic total femoral spacer can be an option to salvage the limb. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 32 patients (median age 67 years; range 15-93; 18 women) who underwent placement of a total femur spacer for chronic periprosthetic joint infection with massive femoral bone loss between 2010 and 2019 as part of a planned two-stage exchange. The median follow-up period amounted to 46 months (range, 1-149). Implant and limb survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Potential risk factors for failure were analyzed. There were 34% (11 of 32) of patients having a spacer-associated complication, and 25% underwent revision for this reason. After the first stage, 92% were considered infection-free. There were 84% of patients who underwent second-stage reimplantation of a total femoral arthroplasty using a modular megaprosthetic implant. Infection-free implant survival was 85% after 2 years and 53% after 5 years. There were 44% of patients who underwent amputation after a median time of 40 months (range, 2-110). Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured at first-stage surgery, while polymicrobial growth was most common at reinfection. Total femur spacers can lead to infection control in over 90% of cases with a reasonable complication rate for the spacer itself. However, the reinfection and subsequent amputation rate after second-stage megaprosthetic total femoral arthroplasty is around 50%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.057
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810923518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540323004564</els_id><sourcerecordid>2810923518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuOEzEQtBCIDQs_wAH5yGUGv8aZkbigaBeCFoGU7NnyeNobRxl7sD0BbvwDfCFfgqPscuTUreqqUncXQi8pqSmh8s2-1jHvakYYr4moSbN8hBa04axqBZGP0YK0La8aQfgFepbSnhBKm0Y8RRd8SQUjsl2g39tvodpkfQf46rvZaV-a2-T8HdZ4G7I-4GsY54g3kzYQsfM47wB_0r4oRvAZB4u_QHRTDKlMsjP4Y3AFX3sLJrvg8Z-fvx7kqzBOB2f0CU9Y-wGvC6ALfTPHozuGmHZuSs_RE6sPCV7c10t0e321XX2obj6_X6_e3VRGEJIr1g1WAOdM6l72jNklE2LgjGppWWugF0spjeXcCm6hodD1srO6BWkYZ13DL9Hrs2_Z_usMKavRJQOHshGEOSnWUtIx3tC2UNmZasqhKYJVU3Sjjj8UJeqUhtqrUxrqlIYiQpU0iujVvf_cjzD8kzy8vxDenglQrjw6iCoZB97A4GL5nhqC-5__XyNInlY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2810923518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection – Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Theil, Christoph ; Moellenbeck, Burkhard ; Puetzler, Jan ; Klingebiel, Sebastian ; Schwarze, Jan ; Gosheger, Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Theil, Christoph ; Moellenbeck, Burkhard ; Puetzler, Jan ; Klingebiel, Sebastian ; Schwarze, Jan ; Gosheger, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic periprosthetic joint infection after revision hip and knee arthroplasties can lead to subsequent massive femoral bone loss. In these cases, resection of the residual femur and placement of an antibiotic total femoral spacer can be an option to salvage the limb. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 32 patients (median age 67 years; range 15-93; 18 women) who underwent placement of a total femur spacer for chronic periprosthetic joint infection with massive femoral bone loss between 2010 and 2019 as part of a planned two-stage exchange. The median follow-up period amounted to 46 months (range, 1-149). Implant and limb survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Potential risk factors for failure were analyzed. There were 34% (11 of 32) of patients having a spacer-associated complication, and 25% underwent revision for this reason. After the first stage, 92% were considered infection-free. There were 84% of patients who underwent second-stage reimplantation of a total femoral arthroplasty using a modular megaprosthetic implant. Infection-free implant survival was 85% after 2 years and 53% after 5 years. There were 44% of patients who underwent amputation after a median time of 40 months (range, 2-110). Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured at first-stage surgery, while polymicrobial growth was most common at reinfection. Total femur spacers can lead to infection control in over 90% of cases with a reasonable complication rate for the spacer itself. However, the reinfection and subsequent amputation rate after second-stage megaprosthetic total femoral arthroplasty is around 50%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37142068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>megaprosthesis ; periprosthetic joint infection ; revision arthroplasty ; THA ; TKA</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2023-10, Vol.38 (10), p.2171-2176</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0563-4128 ; 0000-0001-6793-1844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142068$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theil, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moellenbeck, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puetzler, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingebiel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarze, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosheger, Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection – Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Chronic periprosthetic joint infection after revision hip and knee arthroplasties can lead to subsequent massive femoral bone loss. In these cases, resection of the residual femur and placement of an antibiotic total femoral spacer can be an option to salvage the limb. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 32 patients (median age 67 years; range 15-93; 18 women) who underwent placement of a total femur spacer for chronic periprosthetic joint infection with massive femoral bone loss between 2010 and 2019 as part of a planned two-stage exchange. The median follow-up period amounted to 46 months (range, 1-149). Implant and limb survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Potential risk factors for failure were analyzed. There were 34% (11 of 32) of patients having a spacer-associated complication, and 25% underwent revision for this reason. After the first stage, 92% were considered infection-free. There were 84% of patients who underwent second-stage reimplantation of a total femoral arthroplasty using a modular megaprosthetic implant. Infection-free implant survival was 85% after 2 years and 53% after 5 years. There were 44% of patients who underwent amputation after a median time of 40 months (range, 2-110). Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured at first-stage surgery, while polymicrobial growth was most common at reinfection. Total femur spacers can lead to infection control in over 90% of cases with a reasonable complication rate for the spacer itself. However, the reinfection and subsequent amputation rate after second-stage megaprosthetic total femoral arthroplasty is around 50%.</description><subject>megaprosthesis</subject><subject>periprosthetic joint infection</subject><subject>revision arthroplasty</subject><subject>THA</subject><subject>TKA</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuOEzEQtBCIDQs_wAH5yGUGv8aZkbigaBeCFoGU7NnyeNobRxl7sD0BbvwDfCFfgqPscuTUreqqUncXQi8pqSmh8s2-1jHvakYYr4moSbN8hBa04axqBZGP0YK0La8aQfgFepbSnhBKm0Y8RRd8SQUjsl2g39tvodpkfQf46rvZaV-a2-T8HdZ4G7I-4GsY54g3kzYQsfM47wB_0r4oRvAZB4u_QHRTDKlMsjP4Y3AFX3sLJrvg8Z-fvx7kqzBOB2f0CU9Y-wGvC6ALfTPHozuGmHZuSs_RE6sPCV7c10t0e321XX2obj6_X6_e3VRGEJIr1g1WAOdM6l72jNklE2LgjGppWWugF0spjeXcCm6hodD1srO6BWkYZ13DL9Hrs2_Z_usMKavRJQOHshGEOSnWUtIx3tC2UNmZasqhKYJVU3Sjjj8UJeqUhtqrUxrqlIYiQpU0iujVvf_cjzD8kzy8vxDenglQrjw6iCoZB97A4GL5nhqC-5__XyNInlY</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Theil, Christoph</creator><creator>Moellenbeck, Burkhard</creator><creator>Puetzler, Jan</creator><creator>Klingebiel, Sebastian</creator><creator>Schwarze, Jan</creator><creator>Gosheger, Georg</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-4128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-1844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection – Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships</title><author>Theil, Christoph ; Moellenbeck, Burkhard ; Puetzler, Jan ; Klingebiel, Sebastian ; Schwarze, Jan ; Gosheger, Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>megaprosthesis</topic><topic>periprosthetic joint infection</topic><topic>revision arthroplasty</topic><topic>THA</topic><topic>TKA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theil, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moellenbeck, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puetzler, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingebiel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarze, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosheger, Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theil, Christoph</au><au>Moellenbeck, Burkhard</au><au>Puetzler, Jan</au><au>Klingebiel, Sebastian</au><au>Schwarze, Jan</au><au>Gosheger, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection – Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2171</spage><epage>2176</epage><pages>2171-2176</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Chronic periprosthetic joint infection after revision hip and knee arthroplasties can lead to subsequent massive femoral bone loss. In these cases, resection of the residual femur and placement of an antibiotic total femoral spacer can be an option to salvage the limb. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 32 patients (median age 67 years; range 15-93; 18 women) who underwent placement of a total femur spacer for chronic periprosthetic joint infection with massive femoral bone loss between 2010 and 2019 as part of a planned two-stage exchange. The median follow-up period amounted to 46 months (range, 1-149). Implant and limb survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Potential risk factors for failure were analyzed. There were 34% (11 of 32) of patients having a spacer-associated complication, and 25% underwent revision for this reason. After the first stage, 92% were considered infection-free. There were 84% of patients who underwent second-stage reimplantation of a total femoral arthroplasty using a modular megaprosthetic implant. Infection-free implant survival was 85% after 2 years and 53% after 5 years. There were 44% of patients who underwent amputation after a median time of 40 months (range, 2-110). Most commonly, coagulase-negative staphylococci were cultured at first-stage surgery, while polymicrobial growth was most common at reinfection. Total femur spacers can lead to infection control in over 90% of cases with a reasonable complication rate for the spacer itself. However, the reinfection and subsequent amputation rate after second-stage megaprosthetic total femoral arthroplasty is around 50%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37142068</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.057</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0563-4128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-1844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2023-10, Vol.38 (10), p.2171-2176
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810923518
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects megaprosthesis
periprosthetic joint infection
revision arthroplasty
THA
TKA
title Two-Stage Exchange Using a Total Femur Spacer in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection – Spacer Complications and Implant Survivorships
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two-Stage%20Exchange%20Using%20a%20Total%20Femur%20Spacer%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Periprosthetic%20Joint%20Infection%20%E2%80%93%20Spacer%20Complications%20and%20Implant%20Survivorships&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Theil,%20Christoph&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2171&rft.epage=2176&rft.pages=2171-2176&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2810923518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-29df4e3326ab6b22f7244d321a6f28ceb4766cf33f43fe51e9b69fa8e6c232953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2810923518&rft_id=info:pmid/37142068&rfr_iscdi=true