The modulation of expectation violation on attention: Evidence from the spatial cueing effects

• Published in: Cognition 2023-09, Vol.238, p.105488-105488, Article 105488
• Main Authors: Chen, Luo, Zhu, Ping, Li, Jian, Song, Huixin, Liu, Huiying, Shen, Mowei, Chen, Hui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attention - physiology; Cues; Expectation violation; Humans; Memory encoding cost theory; Motivation; Probability; Reaction Time - physiology; Selective attention; Spatial cueing effects
• ISSN: 0010-0277; 1873-7838
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105488

The study sought to investigate whether and how expectation violation can modulate attention using the exogenous spatial cueing paradigm, under the theoretical framework of the Memory Encoding Cost (MEC) model. The MEC proposes that exogenous spatial cueing effects are mainly driven by a combination of two distinct mechanisms: attentional facilitation triggered by the presence of an abrupt cue, and attentional suppression induced by memory encoding of the cue. In current experiments, participants needed to identify a target letter that was sometimes preceded by a peripheral onset cue. Various types of expectation violation were introduced by regulating the probability of cue presentation (Experiments 1 & 5), the probability of cue location (Experiments 2 & 4), and the probability of irrelevant sound presentation (Experiment 3). The results showed that expectation violation could enhance the cueing effect (valid vs. invalid cue) in some cases. More crucially, all experiments consistently observed asymmetrical modulation of expectation violation on the cost (invalid vs. neutral cue) and benefit (valid vs. neutral cue) effects: Expectation violation increased the cost effects while did not modulate or decreased (or even reversed) the benefit effects. Furthermore, Experiment 5 provided direct evidence that violation of expectations could enhance the memory encoding of a cue (e.g., color) and this memory advantage could manifest quickly in the early stages of the experiment. The MEC better explains these findings than some traditional models like the spotlight: Expectation violation can both enhance the attentional facilitation of the cue and memory encoding of irrelevant cue information. These findings suggest that expectation violation has a general adaptive function in modulating the attention selectivity.