Loading…
RECISTv1.1 progression in oncology: Shades of gray
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-based outcomes, such as objective response rate (ORR) or progression free survival (PFS), are standard outcomes for early oncology trials. These indices provide a black-and-white interpretation of response to therapy. We propose that lesion-l...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer cell 2023-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1003-1005 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-based outcomes, such as objective response rate (ORR) or progression free survival (PFS), are standard outcomes for early oncology trials. These indices provide a black-and-white interpretation of response to therapy. We propose that lesion-level analysis and mechanism-based pharmacodynamic endpoints may provide a more informative index of response to therapy. Accounting for “shades of gray” in lesion-level response assessments may reduce bias in go/no-go decisions and biomarker analyses for novel oncology compounds and discontinuation decisions for individual patients.
The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-based outcomes, such as objective response rate (ORR) or progression free survival (PFS), are standard outcomes for early oncology trials. These indices provide a black-and-white interpretation of response to therapy. We propose that lesion-level analysis and mechanism-based pharmacodynamic endpoints may provide a more informative index of response to therapy. Accounting for “shades of gray” in lesion-level response assessments may reduce bias in go/no-go decisions and biomarker analyses for novel oncology compounds and discontinuation decisions for individual patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1535-6108 1878-3686 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.04.012 |