Correlation of bone mineral density using the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and the magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in Indian patients

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedics 2023-06, Vol.40, p.65-69
• Main Authors: Jain, Mantu, Naik, Suprava, Mishra, Narayan Prasad, Tripathy, Sujit K., Neha, Aishwarya, Sahu, Dinesh Prasad, KP, Lubaib
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoporosis
• ISSN: 0972-978X; 0972-978X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.04.011

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is extensively used to diagnose osteoporosis. But surprisingly, osteoporosis remains an underdiagnosed condition with many fragility fracture patients who have failed to undergo DEXA or received concomitant treatment for osteoporosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine is a routine radiological investigation bring done for low back pain. MRI can detect changes in the bone marrow signal intensity on the standard T1-weighted images. This correlation can be explored to measure osteoporosis in elderly and post-menopausal patients. The present study aims to find any correlation of bone mineral density using the DEXA and MRI of the lumbar spine in Indian patients. Five regions of interest (ROI) of size 130–180 mm2 were placed in the vertebral body in the mid-sagittal section and parasagittal sections on either side (four in L1-L4 and one outside body) of elderly patients who underwent MRI for back pain. They also underwent a DEXA scan for osteoporosis. Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) was calculated by dividing the mean signal intensity obtained for each vertebra by the standard deviation of the noise. Similarly, SNR was measured for 24 controls. An MRI-based “M score” was calculated by getting the difference in SNR patients to SNR controls and then dividing it by the control's standard deviation (SD). Correlation between the T score on DEXA and M scores on MRI was found out. With the M score greater than or equal to 2.82, the sensitivity was 87.5%, and the specificity was 76.5%. M scores negatively correlated with the T score. With the increase in the T score, the M score decreased. The Spearman correlation coefficient for the spine T score was −0.651, with a p-value of