Loading…
Reducing biopharmaceutical manufacturing costs through continuous processing in a flexible J.POD® facility
•Process models were developed to compare traditional stainless-steel and flexible facilities.•J.POD®, a flexible facility employing single-use, portable cleanroom technologies is introduced.•Varying cost structures and utilization rates are compared across different facility types.•A dynamic simula...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug discovery today 2023-07, Vol.28 (7), p.103619-103619, Article 103619 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Process models were developed to compare traditional stainless-steel and flexible facilities.•J.POD®, a flexible facility employing single-use, portable cleanroom technologies is introduced.•Varying cost structures and utilization rates are compared across different facility types.•A dynamic simulation approach is used to model a low-cost biologic drug with uncertain demand.
In this work, process models were developed to capture the impact of biomanufacturing costs on a commercial scale and emphasize the way in which facility design and operation must balance meeting product demand while minimizing production costs. Using a scenario-based modeling approach, several facility design strategies were evaluated, including a traditional large stainless-steel facility and a small footprint, portable-on-demand (POD)-based facility. Bioprocessing platforms were compared by estimating their total production costs across different facility types and specifically illustrating how continuous bioprocessing has gained in popularity as a novel and cost-effective approach to manufacture high-quality biopharmaceuticals. The analysis showed how fluctuations in market demand have a dramatic effect on manufacturing costs and plant utilization, with far-reaching implications on the total cost to patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-6446 1878-5832 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103619 |