Impact of bone and cartilage segmentation from CT and MRI on both bone forearm osteotomy planning

• Published in: International journal for computer assisted radiology and surgery 2023-12, Vol.18 (12), p.2307-2318
• Main Authors: Kuiper, Ruurd J. A., Colaris, Joost W., Stockmans, Filip, van Es, Eline M., Viergever, Max A., Seevinck, Peter R., Weinans, Harrie, Sakkers, Ralph J. B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescents; Bones; Cartilage; Computed tomography; Computer Imaging; Computer Science; Forearm; Health Informatics; Image segmentation; Imaging; Joints (anatomy); Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Pattern Recognition and Graphics; Radiation effects; Radiology; Realignment; Soft tissues; Surgery; Vision; Young adults
• ISSN: 1861-6429; 1861-6410; 1861-6429
• DOI: 10.1007/s11548-023-02929-8

Introduction The use of MRI scans for pre-operative surgical planning of forearm osteotomies provides additional information of joint cartilage and soft tissue structures and reduces radiation exposure in comparison with the use of CT scans. In this study, we investigated whether using 3D information obtained from MRI with and without cartilage information leads to a different outcome of pre-operative planning. Methods Bilateral CT and MRI scans of the forearms of 10 adolescent and young adult patients with a unilateral bone deformation were acquired in a prospective study. The bones were segmented from CT and MRI, and cartilage only from MRI. The deformed bones were virtually reconstructed, by registering the joint ends to the healthy contralateral side. An optimal osteotomy plane was determined that minimized the distance between the resulting fragments. This process was performed in threefold: using the CT and MRI bone segmentations, and the MRI cartilage segmentations. Results Comparison of bone segmentation from MRI and CT scan resulted in a 0.95 ± 0.02 Dice Similarity Coefficient and 0.42 ± 0.07 mm Mean Absolute Surface Distance. All realignment parameters showed excellent reliability across the different segmentations. However, the mean differences in translational realignment between CT and MRI bone segmentations (4.5 ± 2.1 mm) and between MRI bone and MRI bone and cartilage segmentations (2.8 ± 2.1 mm) were shown to be clinically and statistically significant. A significant positive correlation was found between the translational realignment and the relative amount of cartilage. Conclusion This study indicates that although bone realignment remained largely similar when using MRI with and without cartilage information compared to using CT, the small differences in segmentation could induce statistically and clinically significant differences in the osteotomy planning. We also showed that endochondral cartilage might be a non-negligible factor when planning osteotomies for young patients.