Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?

Academic integrity in both higher education and scientific writing has been challenged by developments in artificial intelligence. The limitations associated with algorithms have been largely overcome by the recently released ChatGPT; a chatbot powered by GPT-3.5 capable of producing accurate and hu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Seminars in nuclear medicine 2023-09, Vol.53 (5), p.719-730
Main Author: Currie, Geoffrey M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003
container_end_page 730
container_issue 5
container_start_page 719
container_title Seminars in nuclear medicine
container_volume 53
creator Currie, Geoffrey M.
description Academic integrity in both higher education and scientific writing has been challenged by developments in artificial intelligence. The limitations associated with algorithms have been largely overcome by the recently released ChatGPT; a chatbot powered by GPT-3.5 capable of producing accurate and human-like responses to questions in real-time. Despite the potential benefits, ChatGPT confronts significant limitations to its usefulness in nuclear medicine and radiology. Most notably, ChatGPT is prone to errors and fabrication of information which poses a risk to professionalism, ethics and integrity. These limitations simultaneously undermine the value of ChatGPT to the user by not producing outcomes at the expected standard. Nonetheless, there are a number of exciting applications of ChatGPT in nuclear medicine across education, clinical and research sectors. Assimilation of ChatGPT into practice requires redefining of norms, and re-engineering of information expectations.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2819279031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001299823000363</els_id><sourcerecordid>2819279031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BeQlCxImdtLEbBBUvCQkuihry7XHras8ip0i9e9xKIglqxlpzp2xDyE0gzSDgl-v04BNu9V1gyZlwHgKeQpQHZBRVhRVkk8YPyQjAMgSJkR1Qk5DWAOwohDFMTnhJRtaMSKzO60MNk5T1_a49K7fUdUaqnzvrNNO1d-DunZLbDXeUBfodKX6p9mcrnYbvKIr9B3t_FAx7G7PyJFVdcDznzom748P8-lz8vr29DK9e000L_M-Kc3CCmQlr0oz4YVgSlltAa1VINBOlBGIuVCgtIgUUwueKQ6lzTmaAoCPyeV-78Z3H1sMvWxc0PGhqsVuGySrshgUwLOIVntU-y4Ej1ZuvGuU38kM5OBTruWfTzn4lJDL6DNGL36ubBfD7Df4KzAC93sA418_HXoZtBtMGedR99J07v8rX9J-jH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819279031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Currie, Geoffrey M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Currie, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><description>Academic integrity in both higher education and scientific writing has been challenged by developments in artificial intelligence. The limitations associated with algorithms have been largely overcome by the recently released ChatGPT; a chatbot powered by GPT-3.5 capable of producing accurate and human-like responses to questions in real-time. Despite the potential benefits, ChatGPT confronts significant limitations to its usefulness in nuclear medicine and radiology. Most notably, ChatGPT is prone to errors and fabrication of information which poses a risk to professionalism, ethics and integrity. These limitations simultaneously undermine the value of ChatGPT to the user by not producing outcomes at the expected standard. Nonetheless, there are a number of exciting applications of ChatGPT in nuclear medicine across education, clinical and research sectors. Assimilation of ChatGPT into practice requires redefining of norms, and re-engineering of information expectations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37225599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2023-09, Vol.53 (5), p.719-730</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6180-8586</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Currie, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><title>Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?</title><title>Seminars in nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Academic integrity in both higher education and scientific writing has been challenged by developments in artificial intelligence. The limitations associated with algorithms have been largely overcome by the recently released ChatGPT; a chatbot powered by GPT-3.5 capable of producing accurate and human-like responses to questions in real-time. Despite the potential benefits, ChatGPT confronts significant limitations to its usefulness in nuclear medicine and radiology. Most notably, ChatGPT is prone to errors and fabrication of information which poses a risk to professionalism, ethics and integrity. These limitations simultaneously undermine the value of ChatGPT to the user by not producing outcomes at the expected standard. Nonetheless, there are a number of exciting applications of ChatGPT in nuclear medicine across education, clinical and research sectors. Assimilation of ChatGPT into practice requires redefining of norms, and re-engineering of information expectations.</description><issn>0001-2998</issn><issn>1558-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BeQlCxImdtLEbBBUvCQkuihry7XHras8ip0i9e9xKIglqxlpzp2xDyE0gzSDgl-v04BNu9V1gyZlwHgKeQpQHZBRVhRVkk8YPyQjAMgSJkR1Qk5DWAOwohDFMTnhJRtaMSKzO60MNk5T1_a49K7fUdUaqnzvrNNO1d-DunZLbDXeUBfodKX6p9mcrnYbvKIr9B3t_FAx7G7PyJFVdcDznzom748P8-lz8vr29DK9e000L_M-Kc3CCmQlr0oz4YVgSlltAa1VINBOlBGIuVCgtIgUUwueKQ6lzTmaAoCPyeV-78Z3H1sMvWxc0PGhqsVuGySrshgUwLOIVntU-y4Ej1ZuvGuU38kM5OBTruWfTzn4lJDL6DNGL36ubBfD7Df4KzAC93sA418_HXoZtBtMGedR99J07v8rX9J-jH0</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Currie, Geoffrey M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-8586</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?</title><author>Currie, Geoffrey M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Currie, Geoffrey M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Currie, Geoffrey M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>719</spage><epage>730</epage><pages>719-730</pages><issn>0001-2998</issn><eissn>1558-4623</eissn><abstract>Academic integrity in both higher education and scientific writing has been challenged by developments in artificial intelligence. The limitations associated with algorithms have been largely overcome by the recently released ChatGPT; a chatbot powered by GPT-3.5 capable of producing accurate and human-like responses to questions in real-time. Despite the potential benefits, ChatGPT confronts significant limitations to its usefulness in nuclear medicine and radiology. Most notably, ChatGPT is prone to errors and fabrication of information which poses a risk to professionalism, ethics and integrity. These limitations simultaneously undermine the value of ChatGPT to the user by not producing outcomes at the expected standard. Nonetheless, there are a number of exciting applications of ChatGPT in nuclear medicine across education, clinical and research sectors. Assimilation of ChatGPT into practice requires redefining of norms, and re-engineering of information expectations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37225599</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-8586</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-2998
ispartof Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2023-09, Vol.53 (5), p.719-730
issn 0001-2998
1558-4623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2819279031
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
title Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T02%3A25%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academic%20integrity%20and%20artificial%20intelligence:%20is%20ChatGPT%20hype,%20hero%20or%20heresy?&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Currie,%20Geoffrey%20M.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=719&rft.epage=730&rft.pages=719-730&rft.issn=0001-2998&rft.eissn=1558-4623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2819279031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-7dbf9e27387d63592aafcf0effa09ef6ad9ee49a0ac92732ab31a307f43ed5003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819279031&rft_id=info:pmid/37225599&rfr_iscdi=true