Loading…

Opportunistic coeliac disease screening in undifferentiated presentations to paediatric acute care

Aim Coeliac disease (CD) can remain undiagnosed due to absent/atypical symptoms. We evaluated screening for CD in undifferentiated paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Methods Subjects were all patients presenting to a children's hospital ED during the study period who had bloo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of paediatrics and child health 2023-08, Vol.59 (8), p.992-997
Main Authors: Pathmanandavel, Karrnan, Wong, Melanie, Williams, Emma, Stormon, Michael, Nogajski, Rebecca, Williams, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3
container_end_page 997
container_issue 8
container_start_page 992
container_title Journal of paediatrics and child health
container_volume 59
creator Pathmanandavel, Karrnan
Wong, Melanie
Williams, Emma
Stormon, Michael
Nogajski, Rebecca
Williams, Andrew
description Aim Coeliac disease (CD) can remain undiagnosed due to absent/atypical symptoms. We evaluated screening for CD in undifferentiated paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Methods Subjects were all patients presenting to a children's hospital ED during the study period who had blood taken. Plasma remaining after routine care was tested for tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG IgA) and deamidated gliadin IgG (DGP IgG) antibodies. Patients with positive results were counselled and offered confirmatory testing, then gastroenterology review if warranted. Results An initial positive result for either DGP IgG or tTG IgA was found in 4.2% (44/1055). There was a normalisation of 76% (19/25) of positive DGP IgG and 44% (4/9) of tTG IgA results on repeat testing, which was not available in 27% (12/44). The prevalence of biopsy‐confirmed CD was 0.7% (7/1055), including two new diagnoses and five subjects with known CD. Three likely cases could not be confirmed. All confirmed and likely cases were >10 years old. In children >10 years old, the prevalence of either biopsy‐confirmed or likely CD was 3.3% (10/302). A family history of CD, growth concerns, recurrent abdominal pain and lethargy were associated with persistence of positive tests. Conclusion Opportunistic testing for CD in ED requires further investigation as a CD screening strategy. Our results suggest optimal screening in this setting should be by initially testing for tTG IgA and total IgA in children >10 years old (minimising transiently positive tests). Transiently positive coeliac antibodies may also warrant further investigation as a predictor of future CD.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpc.16446
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2820337337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2844065134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYgIMobk4P_gEJeNFDt6RJ2-wow08G86DnkiZvJKNLa5Ii-_dmTj0IhkAS8vDw8iB0TsmUpjVb92pKS87LAzSmnJOMVgU_THfCeMYFJSN0EsKaEJIXhThGI1blvKwKMUbNqu87HwdnQ7QKqw5aKxXWNoAMgIPyAM66N2wdHpy2xoAHF62MoHHvIaSHjLZzAccO9xJ0-vLJJNUQASvp4RQdGdkGOPs-J-j17vZl8ZAtV_ePi5tlppgQZWa4pgbmCrTR3PAqjUiM0HJeUM3mrBSmZApUQSRIzRrelFTkTW4qYgxRSrEJutp7e9-9DxBivbFBQdtKB90Q6lzkhLFqtyfo8g-67gbv0nSJSgHLgjKeqOs9pXwXggdT995upN_WlNS78HUKX3-FT-zFt3FoNqB_yZ_SCZjtgQ_bwvZ_U_30vNgrPwH34o7Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844065134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opportunistic coeliac disease screening in undifferentiated presentations to paediatric acute care</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan ; Wong, Melanie ; Williams, Emma ; Stormon, Michael ; Nogajski, Rebecca ; Williams, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan ; Wong, Melanie ; Williams, Emma ; Stormon, Michael ; Nogajski, Rebecca ; Williams, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Coeliac disease (CD) can remain undiagnosed due to absent/atypical symptoms. We evaluated screening for CD in undifferentiated paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Methods Subjects were all patients presenting to a children's hospital ED during the study period who had blood taken. Plasma remaining after routine care was tested for tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG IgA) and deamidated gliadin IgG (DGP IgG) antibodies. Patients with positive results were counselled and offered confirmatory testing, then gastroenterology review if warranted. Results An initial positive result for either DGP IgG or tTG IgA was found in 4.2% (44/1055). There was a normalisation of 76% (19/25) of positive DGP IgG and 44% (4/9) of tTG IgA results on repeat testing, which was not available in 27% (12/44). The prevalence of biopsy‐confirmed CD was 0.7% (7/1055), including two new diagnoses and five subjects with known CD. Three likely cases could not be confirmed. All confirmed and likely cases were &gt;10 years old. In children &gt;10 years old, the prevalence of either biopsy‐confirmed or likely CD was 3.3% (10/302). A family history of CD, growth concerns, recurrent abdominal pain and lethargy were associated with persistence of positive tests. Conclusion Opportunistic testing for CD in ED requires further investigation as a CD screening strategy. Our results suggest optimal screening in this setting should be by initially testing for tTG IgA and total IgA in children &gt;10 years old (minimising transiently positive tests). Transiently positive coeliac antibodies may also warrant further investigation as a predictor of future CD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1034-4810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16446</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37246758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Autoantibodies ; Biopsy ; Celiac disease ; Celiac Disease - diagnosis ; Child ; emergency department ; Emergency medical care ; Gliadin ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin A ; Immunoglobulin G ; Medical screening ; Pediatrics ; potential coeliac disease ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; targeted screening ; Transglutaminases</subject><ispartof>Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2023-08, Vol.59 (8), p.992-997</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3614-7085</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stormon, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogajski, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Opportunistic coeliac disease screening in undifferentiated presentations to paediatric acute care</title><title>Journal of paediatrics and child health</title><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><description>Aim Coeliac disease (CD) can remain undiagnosed due to absent/atypical symptoms. We evaluated screening for CD in undifferentiated paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Methods Subjects were all patients presenting to a children's hospital ED during the study period who had blood taken. Plasma remaining after routine care was tested for tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG IgA) and deamidated gliadin IgG (DGP IgG) antibodies. Patients with positive results were counselled and offered confirmatory testing, then gastroenterology review if warranted. Results An initial positive result for either DGP IgG or tTG IgA was found in 4.2% (44/1055). There was a normalisation of 76% (19/25) of positive DGP IgG and 44% (4/9) of tTG IgA results on repeat testing, which was not available in 27% (12/44). The prevalence of biopsy‐confirmed CD was 0.7% (7/1055), including two new diagnoses and five subjects with known CD. Three likely cases could not be confirmed. All confirmed and likely cases were &gt;10 years old. In children &gt;10 years old, the prevalence of either biopsy‐confirmed or likely CD was 3.3% (10/302). A family history of CD, growth concerns, recurrent abdominal pain and lethargy were associated with persistence of positive tests. Conclusion Opportunistic testing for CD in ED requires further investigation as a CD screening strategy. Our results suggest optimal screening in this setting should be by initially testing for tTG IgA and total IgA in children &gt;10 years old (minimising transiently positive tests). Transiently positive coeliac antibodies may also warrant further investigation as a predictor of future CD.</description><subject>Autoantibodies</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Celiac disease</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Gliadin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin A</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>potential coeliac disease</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>targeted screening</subject><subject>Transglutaminases</subject><issn>1034-4810</issn><issn>1440-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYgIMobk4P_gEJeNFDt6RJ2-wow08G86DnkiZvJKNLa5Ii-_dmTj0IhkAS8vDw8iB0TsmUpjVb92pKS87LAzSmnJOMVgU_THfCeMYFJSN0EsKaEJIXhThGI1blvKwKMUbNqu87HwdnQ7QKqw5aKxXWNoAMgIPyAM66N2wdHpy2xoAHF62MoHHvIaSHjLZzAccO9xJ0-vLJJNUQASvp4RQdGdkGOPs-J-j17vZl8ZAtV_ePi5tlppgQZWa4pgbmCrTR3PAqjUiM0HJeUM3mrBSmZApUQSRIzRrelFTkTW4qYgxRSrEJutp7e9-9DxBivbFBQdtKB90Q6lzkhLFqtyfo8g-67gbv0nSJSgHLgjKeqOs9pXwXggdT995upN_WlNS78HUKX3-FT-zFt3FoNqB_yZ_SCZjtgQ_bwvZ_U_30vNgrPwH34o7Z</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan</creator><creator>Wong, Melanie</creator><creator>Williams, Emma</creator><creator>Stormon, Michael</creator><creator>Nogajski, Rebecca</creator><creator>Williams, Andrew</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3614-7085</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Opportunistic coeliac disease screening in undifferentiated presentations to paediatric acute care</title><author>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan ; Wong, Melanie ; Williams, Emma ; Stormon, Michael ; Nogajski, Rebecca ; Williams, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Autoantibodies</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Celiac disease</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Gliadin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin A</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>potential coeliac disease</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>targeted screening</topic><topic>Transglutaminases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stormon, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogajski, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pathmanandavel, Karrnan</au><au>Wong, Melanie</au><au>Williams, Emma</au><au>Stormon, Michael</au><au>Nogajski, Rebecca</au><au>Williams, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opportunistic coeliac disease screening in undifferentiated presentations to paediatric acute care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paediatrics and child health</jtitle><addtitle>J Paediatr Child Health</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>992</spage><epage>997</epage><pages>992-997</pages><issn>1034-4810</issn><eissn>1440-1754</eissn><abstract>Aim Coeliac disease (CD) can remain undiagnosed due to absent/atypical symptoms. We evaluated screening for CD in undifferentiated paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED). Methods Subjects were all patients presenting to a children's hospital ED during the study period who had blood taken. Plasma remaining after routine care was tested for tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG IgA) and deamidated gliadin IgG (DGP IgG) antibodies. Patients with positive results were counselled and offered confirmatory testing, then gastroenterology review if warranted. Results An initial positive result for either DGP IgG or tTG IgA was found in 4.2% (44/1055). There was a normalisation of 76% (19/25) of positive DGP IgG and 44% (4/9) of tTG IgA results on repeat testing, which was not available in 27% (12/44). The prevalence of biopsy‐confirmed CD was 0.7% (7/1055), including two new diagnoses and five subjects with known CD. Three likely cases could not be confirmed. All confirmed and likely cases were &gt;10 years old. In children &gt;10 years old, the prevalence of either biopsy‐confirmed or likely CD was 3.3% (10/302). A family history of CD, growth concerns, recurrent abdominal pain and lethargy were associated with persistence of positive tests. Conclusion Opportunistic testing for CD in ED requires further investigation as a CD screening strategy. Our results suggest optimal screening in this setting should be by initially testing for tTG IgA and total IgA in children &gt;10 years old (minimising transiently positive tests). Transiently positive coeliac antibodies may also warrant further investigation as a predictor of future CD.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>37246758</pmid><doi>10.1111/jpc.16446</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3614-7085</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1034-4810
ispartof Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2023-08, Vol.59 (8), p.992-997
issn 1034-4810
1440-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2820337337
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Autoantibodies
Biopsy
Celiac disease
Celiac Disease - diagnosis
Child
emergency department
Emergency medical care
Gliadin
Humans
Immunoglobulin A
Immunoglobulin G
Medical screening
Pediatrics
potential coeliac disease
Sensitivity and Specificity
targeted screening
Transglutaminases
title Opportunistic coeliac disease screening in undifferentiated presentations to paediatric acute care
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A37%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opportunistic%20coeliac%20disease%20screening%20in%20undifferentiated%20presentations%20to%20paediatric%20acute%20care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paediatrics%20and%20child%20health&rft.au=Pathmanandavel,%20Karrnan&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=992&rft.epage=997&rft.pages=992-997&rft.issn=1034-4810&rft.eissn=1440-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpc.16446&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844065134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-f4d1fe9cedfd4f477240f8da951d39368f63cec50aead3b4b6182b2f70ff0ccc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844065134&rft_id=info:pmid/37246758&rfr_iscdi=true