Effectiveness of Community-Based Rehabilitation Interventions on Symptoms and Functioning for People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that imposes huge burden of illness on the society. We aimed to conduct a meta-analytic and systematic review of literature on the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions on symptoms and functioning for people with schizophrenia. The Pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatric quarterly 2023-09, Vol.94 (3), p.501-529
Main Authors: Ye, Xin, Zeng, Fangyi, Wang, Yanshang, Ding, Ruoxi, Zhao, Miaomiao, Zhu, Dawei, He, Ping
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case management
Clinical research
Clinical trials
Cognitive ability
Community-based programs
Community-based treatment
Intervention
Literature reviews
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Meta-analysis
Psychiatry
Public Health
Rehabilitation
Retraining
Review Article
Schizophrenia
Sociology
Symptoms
Systematic review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that imposes huge burden of illness on the society. We aimed to conduct a meta-analytic and systematic review of literature on the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions on symptoms and functioning for people with schizophrenia. The PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched through April 16 and 17, 2021, including clinical trial registries and previous Cochrane reviews. We included 24 randomized controlled trials in this review. The content of interventions varied from single-faceted rehabilitation intervention or cognitive retraining, to multi-component rehabilitation interventions or case management. Among 20 studies that reported effects of community-based rehabilitation interventions on symptoms, the pooled SMDs across all interventions was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.11, 1.76; P 
ISSN:0033-2720
1573-6709
DOI:10.1007/s11126-023-10029-8