Loading…
Censoring : a case study and bibliographic guide
D.H. Lawrence thought Lady Chatterleys Lover was his best and most important novel. Yet he had to pay to have it privately printed. His publishers thought his sexual descriptions and language were obscene under the censorship laws of the UK and the USA, and they were right. From 1928 until 1959 no-o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reference services review 2000-06, Vol.28 (2) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | D.H. Lawrence thought Lady Chatterleys Lover was his best and most important novel. Yet he had to pay to have it privately printed. His publishers thought his sexual descriptions and language were obscene under the censorship laws of the UK and the USA, and they were right. From 1928 until 1959 no-one could legally publish or sell the unexpurgated novel, and copies were subject to confiscation. All this changed in 1959 when Charles Rembar successfully defended Grove Presss right to publish the novel. His defense, which rested on a unique interpretation of Justice Brennans opinion in Roth v. United States, introduced the redeeming-social-value test for obscenity. Within six years it revolutionized American obscenity laws, ensuring that sexual material with even a small measure of social value would enjoy First Amendment protection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-7324 |
DOI: | 10.1108/00907320010326719 |