Loading…
Definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding and 3D image-guided brachytherapy for patients with cervical cancer: feasibility for Japanese patients and dose-response analyses for local control in the low-dose range
To assess the feasibility of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding in definitive radiotherapy for Japanese patients with cervical cancer. We retrospectively analysed the data of cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy with...
Saved in:
Published in: | Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2023-06, Vol.53 (6), p.480-488 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To assess the feasibility of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding in definitive radiotherapy for Japanese patients with cervical cancer.
We retrospectively analysed the data of cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy without central shielding and three-dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy.
The study included 167 patients (T1 + 2 = 108, T3 + 4 = 59) from eight Japanese institutions. For three-dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy, intra-cavitary and interstitial brachytherapy was utilized in 33 patients (20%). The median follow-up was 26.6 months (interquartile range, 20-43.2). The maximum rectal D2 (75 Gy)/bladder D2 (90 Gy) constraints were deviated by 6%/10% and 10%/5% for T1 + 2 and T3 + 4, respectively. The 2-year incidence of ≥grade 3 proctitis/cystitis was 4%/1% for T1 + 2 and 10%/2% for T3 + 4. The 2-year local progression-free survival was 89% for T1 + 2 and 82% for T3 + 4. For T1 + 2, the 2-year local progression-free survival for the high-risk clinical target volume D90 ≥ 68 Gy (indicated by receiver operating characteristic analysis; area under the curve = 0.711) was 92% versus 67% for |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-3621 1465-3621 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jjco/hyad022 |