Loading…

Early ERP indices of gender-biased processing elicited by generic masculine role nouns and the feminine–masculine pair form

•The generic masculine form biases the brain towards processing men.•The feminine–masculine pair form biases the brain towards processing women.•Neither form elicits early gender-balanced neural computations. In most gender-marked languages, the masculine form is used to refer to male people specifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and language 2023-07, Vol.242, p.105290-105290, Article 105290
Main Authors: Glim, Sarah, Körner, Anita, Härtl, Holden, Rummer, Ralf
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The generic masculine form biases the brain towards processing men.•The feminine–masculine pair form biases the brain towards processing women.•Neither form elicits early gender-balanced neural computations. In most gender-marked languages, the masculine form is used to refer to male people specifically as well as to people of any gender generically. This dual functionality was shown in behavioral studies to lead to male-biased mental representations. Here, using EEG, we targeted the neurophysiological basis of this bias by investigating whether and how the generic masculine influences the early perceptual and cognitive processing of anaphoric references to men and women. We found that ERP amplitudes in the P200 range were larger for references to women than to men after generic masculine role nouns, while amplitudes in the P300 range were larger for references to men than to women after the feminine–masculine pair form. These findings suggest that the generic masculine primes the perceptual system towards processing men and that neither this form nor the feminine–masculine pair form elicits gender-balanced computations during early processing in the human brain.
ISSN:0093-934X
1090-2155
DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105290