Loading…

The Association Between Interview Day and Rank Order in Plastic Surgery Match: Is Recency Effect to Blame?

•Integrated plastic surgery applicants who interviewed on day 1 were had worse rank scores.•Integrated applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical education 2023-08, Vol.80 (8), p.1172-1178
Main Authors: De May, Henning, Marquez, Jessica L., Scott, Kaylee, Pires, Giovanna, Crombie, Courtney
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-552a6da7257e6efadc48ab95c9abf6ea7fd85f54b34facabfdd65d32169e2e563
container_end_page 1178
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1172
container_title Journal of surgical education
container_volume 80
creator De May, Henning
Marquez, Jessica L.
Scott, Kaylee
Pires, Giovanna
Crombie, Courtney
description •Integrated plastic surgery applicants who interviewed on day 1 were had worse rank scores.•Integrated applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on day 1 had an increased odds of being ranked in the last quartile.•Interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH for integrated plastic surgery applicants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery is among the most competitive specialties in the National Resident Matching Program match. Though efforts to institute unbiased and equitable measures of an applicant's success have been made, many barriers still hinder suitable applicants from successfully matching. We sought to identify whether interview day influenced applicants’ likelihood of being ranked favorably in both independent and integrated plastic surgery residency programs at a single academic institution. Data from 10 years of independent plastic surgery applicants and 8 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants were queried. Data regarding whether applicants were interviewed on day 1, day 2, or during subinternships (integrated cohort only) and what number they were on the programs rank list were included in the analysis. A total of 226 independent applicants 237 integrated applicants were identified. For integrated applicants, those who interviewed on day 1 were weighted toward worse rank scores. Applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly. Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile. For those who interviewed on day 1, the odds of being ranked in the last quartile was 2.34 times higher than those who interviewed on day 2 (p = 0.02). Our results demonstrating that interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH. Further study is needed to determine if this effect is can be observed in other academic plastic surgery programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824689973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720423001642</els_id><sourcerecordid>2824689973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-552a6da7257e6efadc48ab95c9abf6ea7fd85f54b34facabfdd65d32169e2e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha0KVCjtL0BCPnJJ6thxEleqqoVSWAkEAnq2Zu1xccgmYHuL9t_XdIEjpxmN3nsz8xGyX7GyYlXztS_7uAp_Ss64KJksWcU-kN2qa7uirSXfyr0SVdFyVu-QTzH2jMlacfWR7IhW5IRa7JL-9g7pLMbJeEh-GukRpifEkc7HhOGvxyf6E9YURkuvYbynl8FioH6kVwPE5A29ySdgWNMLSObuG51Heo0GR7OmJ86hSTRN9GiAJf74TLYdDBG_vNQ98vvXye3xWXF-eTo_np0XRjCVCik5NBZaLlts0IE1dQcLJY2ChWsQWmc76WS9ELUDk2fWNtIKXjUKOcpG7JHDTe5DmB5XGJNe-mhwGGDEaRU173jddEq1IkvFRmrCFGNApx-CX0JY64rpZ8i61_8h62fImkmdIWfXwcuC1WKJ9s3zSjULvm8EmN_MDIOOxmcmaH3ISLSd_LsL_gHF9o90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2824689973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Association Between Interview Day and Rank Order in Plastic Surgery Match: Is Recency Effect to Blame?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>De May, Henning ; Marquez, Jessica L. ; Scott, Kaylee ; Pires, Giovanna ; Crombie, Courtney</creator><creatorcontrib>De May, Henning ; Marquez, Jessica L. ; Scott, Kaylee ; Pires, Giovanna ; Crombie, Courtney</creatorcontrib><description>•Integrated plastic surgery applicants who interviewed on day 1 were had worse rank scores.•Integrated applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on day 1 had an increased odds of being ranked in the last quartile.•Interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH for integrated plastic surgery applicants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery is among the most competitive specialties in the National Resident Matching Program match. Though efforts to institute unbiased and equitable measures of an applicant's success have been made, many barriers still hinder suitable applicants from successfully matching. We sought to identify whether interview day influenced applicants’ likelihood of being ranked favorably in both independent and integrated plastic surgery residency programs at a single academic institution. Data from 10 years of independent plastic surgery applicants and 8 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants were queried. Data regarding whether applicants were interviewed on day 1, day 2, or during subinternships (integrated cohort only) and what number they were on the programs rank list were included in the analysis. A total of 226 independent applicants 237 integrated applicants were identified. For integrated applicants, those who interviewed on day 1 were weighted toward worse rank scores. Applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly. Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile. For those who interviewed on day 1, the odds of being ranked in the last quartile was 2.34 times higher than those who interviewed on day 2 (p = 0.02). Our results demonstrating that interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH. Further study is needed to determine if this effect is can be observed in other academic plastic surgery programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37301643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Independent plastic surgery match ; Integrated plastic surgery match ; Internship and Residency ; Plastic surgery interview day ; Plastic surgery match ; Schools ; Surgery, Plastic - education</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2023-08, Vol.80 (8), p.1172-1178</ispartof><rights>2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-552a6da7257e6efadc48ab95c9abf6ea7fd85f54b34facabfdd65d32169e2e563</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3428-1579 ; 0000-0003-2687-1173 ; 0000-0002-1041-2872 ; 0000-0001-9521-7197</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De May, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kaylee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crombie, Courtney</creatorcontrib><title>The Association Between Interview Day and Rank Order in Plastic Surgery Match: Is Recency Effect to Blame?</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>•Integrated plastic surgery applicants who interviewed on day 1 were had worse rank scores.•Integrated applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on day 1 had an increased odds of being ranked in the last quartile.•Interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH for integrated plastic surgery applicants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery is among the most competitive specialties in the National Resident Matching Program match. Though efforts to institute unbiased and equitable measures of an applicant's success have been made, many barriers still hinder suitable applicants from successfully matching. We sought to identify whether interview day influenced applicants’ likelihood of being ranked favorably in both independent and integrated plastic surgery residency programs at a single academic institution. Data from 10 years of independent plastic surgery applicants and 8 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants were queried. Data regarding whether applicants were interviewed on day 1, day 2, or during subinternships (integrated cohort only) and what number they were on the programs rank list were included in the analysis. A total of 226 independent applicants 237 integrated applicants were identified. For integrated applicants, those who interviewed on day 1 were weighted toward worse rank scores. Applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly. Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile. For those who interviewed on day 1, the odds of being ranked in the last quartile was 2.34 times higher than those who interviewed on day 2 (p = 0.02). Our results demonstrating that interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH. Further study is needed to determine if this effect is can be observed in other academic plastic surgery programs.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent plastic surgery match</subject><subject>Integrated plastic surgery match</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Plastic surgery interview day</subject><subject>Plastic surgery match</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - education</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha0KVCjtL0BCPnJJ6thxEleqqoVSWAkEAnq2Zu1xccgmYHuL9t_XdIEjpxmN3nsz8xGyX7GyYlXztS_7uAp_Ss64KJksWcU-kN2qa7uirSXfyr0SVdFyVu-QTzH2jMlacfWR7IhW5IRa7JL-9g7pLMbJeEh-GukRpifEkc7HhOGvxyf6E9YURkuvYbynl8FioH6kVwPE5A29ySdgWNMLSObuG51Heo0GR7OmJ86hSTRN9GiAJf74TLYdDBG_vNQ98vvXye3xWXF-eTo_np0XRjCVCik5NBZaLlts0IE1dQcLJY2ChWsQWmc76WS9ELUDk2fWNtIKXjUKOcpG7JHDTe5DmB5XGJNe-mhwGGDEaRU173jddEq1IkvFRmrCFGNApx-CX0JY64rpZ8i61_8h62fImkmdIWfXwcuC1WKJ9s3zSjULvm8EmN_MDIOOxmcmaH3ISLSd_LsL_gHF9o90</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>De May, Henning</creator><creator>Marquez, Jessica L.</creator><creator>Scott, Kaylee</creator><creator>Pires, Giovanna</creator><creator>Crombie, Courtney</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3428-1579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-7197</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>The Association Between Interview Day and Rank Order in Plastic Surgery Match: Is Recency Effect to Blame?</title><author>De May, Henning ; Marquez, Jessica L. ; Scott, Kaylee ; Pires, Giovanna ; Crombie, Courtney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-552a6da7257e6efadc48ab95c9abf6ea7fd85f54b34facabfdd65d32169e2e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent plastic surgery match</topic><topic>Integrated plastic surgery match</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Plastic surgery interview day</topic><topic>Plastic surgery match</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De May, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquez, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Kaylee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, Giovanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crombie, Courtney</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De May, Henning</au><au>Marquez, Jessica L.</au><au>Scott, Kaylee</au><au>Pires, Giovanna</au><au>Crombie, Courtney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Association Between Interview Day and Rank Order in Plastic Surgery Match: Is Recency Effect to Blame?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1172</spage><epage>1178</epage><pages>1172-1178</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>•Integrated plastic surgery applicants who interviewed on day 1 were had worse rank scores.•Integrated applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile.•Integrated applicants who interviewed on day 1 had an increased odds of being ranked in the last quartile.•Interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH for integrated plastic surgery applicants. Plastic and reconstructive surgery is among the most competitive specialties in the National Resident Matching Program match. Though efforts to institute unbiased and equitable measures of an applicant's success have been made, many barriers still hinder suitable applicants from successfully matching. We sought to identify whether interview day influenced applicants’ likelihood of being ranked favorably in both independent and integrated plastic surgery residency programs at a single academic institution. Data from 10 years of independent plastic surgery applicants and 8 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants were queried. Data regarding whether applicants were interviewed on day 1, day 2, or during subinternships (integrated cohort only) and what number they were on the programs rank list were included in the analysis. A total of 226 independent applicants 237 integrated applicants were identified. For integrated applicants, those who interviewed on day 1 were weighted toward worse rank scores. Applicants who interviewed during their subinternship had a bimodal distribution either ranking favorably or poorly. Integrated applicants who interviewed on the second day were more likely to be ranked in the first quartile. For those who interviewed on day 1, the odds of being ranked in the last quartile was 2.34 times higher than those who interviewed on day 2 (p = 0.02). Our results demonstrating that interview day may influence an applicant's final rank in the MATCH. Further study is needed to determine if this effect is can be observed in other academic plastic surgery programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37301643</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3428-1579</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2687-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-2872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-7197</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7204
ispartof Journal of surgical education, 2023-08, Vol.80 (8), p.1172-1178
issn 1931-7204
1878-7452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2824689973
source Elsevier
subjects Humans
Independent plastic surgery match
Integrated plastic surgery match
Internship and Residency
Plastic surgery interview day
Plastic surgery match
Schools
Surgery, Plastic - education
title The Association Between Interview Day and Rank Order in Plastic Surgery Match: Is Recency Effect to Blame?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Association%20Between%20Interview%20Day%20and%20Rank%20Order%20in%20Plastic%20Surgery%20Match:%20Is%20Recency%20Effect%20to%20Blame?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=De%20May,%20Henning&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1172&rft.epage=1178&rft.pages=1172-1178&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2824689973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-552a6da7257e6efadc48ab95c9abf6ea7fd85f54b34facabfdd65d32169e2e563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2824689973&rft_id=info:pmid/37301643&rfr_iscdi=true