Loading…

Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?

A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital reso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2023-08, Vol.70, p.171-174
Main Authors: Saxena, Monica, Bloos, Sean M., Graber-Naidich, Anna, Sundaram, Vandana, Pasao, Melissa, Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283
container_end_page 174
container_issue
container_start_page 171
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 70
creator Saxena, Monica
Bloos, Sean M.
Graber-Naidich, Anna
Sundaram, Vandana
Pasao, Melissa
Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.
description A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department. We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality. The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA. There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2827253337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675723002784</els_id><sourcerecordid>2840633683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVRmm_QNdVJa6YZPgRxw7CAmhYYCRaLtg1K3lcW6E0zwG20GCX4-HARZddHVl6fO595yD0DdKckpoedzmpoU-Z4TxnIicMPUBzajgLFNU0o9oRiQXWSmFPECHIbSEUFqI4jM64JIzWSo-Q9Mf452JbhywG_D54hZv0wuGiO_GsHXRdNhDGCdvAU_Rde7pBT7Bq4BdxNH1gJvRY1M_mMFCjX_drpc_V9i78BeH6BPdOPu-IN4BXl6cfUGfGtMF-Po652h9uVwvrrOb31erxflNZrkqYmYoZ1ZxVjWlquvKNLxMlorkQzWWCWYLqgStpJRVJQmpBaUbWzLYFHVBmeJzdLSX3frxfoIQde-Cha4zA4xT0EwxyQTnKY45-vEP2ibTQzouUQUpOU9xJYrtKevHEDw0eutdb_yjpkTvOtGt3nWid51oIjR5ueL7q_S06aF-__JWQgJO9wCkKB4ceB1sqiCl6TzYqOvR_U__GYE9mwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2840633683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Saxena, Monica ; Bloos, Sean M. ; Graber-Naidich, Anna ; Sundaram, Vandana ; Pasao, Melissa ; Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Monica ; Bloos, Sean M. ; Graber-Naidich, Anna ; Sundaram, Vandana ; Pasao, Melissa ; Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creatorcontrib><description>A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department. We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality. The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA. There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37327683</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ACS ; Acute coronary syndromes ; Angina ; Angina pectoris ; Authorship ; Biomarkers ; Cardiac catheterization ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Emergency department ; Emergency medical care ; Heart attacks ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Intubation ; Ischemia ; Medical imaging ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; NSTEMI ; Patients ; Resource utilization ; Risk factors ; Software ; Writing</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023-08, Vol.70, p.171-174</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37327683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloos, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber-Naidich, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Vandana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasao, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department. We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality. The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA. There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.</description><subject>ACS</subject><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Angina</subject><subject>Angina pectoris</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>NSTEMI</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVRmm_QNdVJa6YZPgRxw7CAmhYYCRaLtg1K3lcW6E0zwG20GCX4-HARZddHVl6fO595yD0DdKckpoedzmpoU-Z4TxnIicMPUBzajgLFNU0o9oRiQXWSmFPECHIbSEUFqI4jM64JIzWSo-Q9Mf452JbhywG_D54hZv0wuGiO_GsHXRdNhDGCdvAU_Rde7pBT7Bq4BdxNH1gJvRY1M_mMFCjX_drpc_V9i78BeH6BPdOPu-IN4BXl6cfUGfGtMF-Po652h9uVwvrrOb31erxflNZrkqYmYoZ1ZxVjWlquvKNLxMlorkQzWWCWYLqgStpJRVJQmpBaUbWzLYFHVBmeJzdLSX3frxfoIQde-Cha4zA4xT0EwxyQTnKY45-vEP2ibTQzouUQUpOU9xJYrtKevHEDw0eutdb_yjpkTvOtGt3nWid51oIjR5ueL7q_S06aF-__JWQgJO9wCkKB4ceB1sqiCl6TzYqOvR_U__GYE9mwg</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Saxena, Monica</creator><creator>Bloos, Sean M.</creator><creator>Graber-Naidich, Anna</creator><creator>Sundaram, Vandana</creator><creator>Pasao, Melissa</creator><creator>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</title><author>Saxena, Monica ; Bloos, Sean M. ; Graber-Naidich, Anna ; Sundaram, Vandana ; Pasao, Melissa ; Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>ACS</topic><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Angina</topic><topic>Angina pectoris</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>NSTEMI</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloos, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber-Naidich, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Vandana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasao, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saxena, Monica</au><au>Bloos, Sean M.</au><au>Graber-Naidich, Anna</au><au>Sundaram, Vandana</au><au>Pasao, Melissa</au><au>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>171</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>171-174</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department. We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality. The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA. There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37327683</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023-08, Vol.70, p.171-174
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2827253337
source Elsevier
subjects ACS
Acute coronary syndromes
Angina
Angina pectoris
Authorship
Biomarkers
Cardiac catheterization
Cardiology
Cardiovascular disease
Emergency department
Emergency medical care
Heart attacks
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Intubation
Ischemia
Medical imaging
Mortality
Myocardial infarction
NSTEMI
Patients
Resource utilization
Risk factors
Software
Writing
title Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A22%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20ACS%20patient%20hospital%20resource%20utilization:%20Is%20it%20time%20for%20advanced%20NSTEMI%20risk%20stratification%20in%20the%20ED?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Saxena,%20Monica&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=171-174&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2840633683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2840633683&rft_id=info:pmid/37327683&rfr_iscdi=true