Loading…
Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?
A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital reso...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2023-08, Vol.70, p.171-174 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283 |
container_end_page | 174 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | The American journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Saxena, Monica Bloos, Sean M. Graber-Naidich, Anna Sundaram, Vandana Pasao, Melissa Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B. |
description | A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department.
We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality.
The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA.
There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2827253337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675723002784</els_id><sourcerecordid>2840633683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVRmm_QNdVJa6YZPgRxw7CAmhYYCRaLtg1K3lcW6E0zwG20GCX4-HARZddHVl6fO595yD0DdKckpoedzmpoU-Z4TxnIicMPUBzajgLFNU0o9oRiQXWSmFPECHIbSEUFqI4jM64JIzWSo-Q9Mf452JbhywG_D54hZv0wuGiO_GsHXRdNhDGCdvAU_Rde7pBT7Bq4BdxNH1gJvRY1M_mMFCjX_drpc_V9i78BeH6BPdOPu-IN4BXl6cfUGfGtMF-Po652h9uVwvrrOb31erxflNZrkqYmYoZ1ZxVjWlquvKNLxMlorkQzWWCWYLqgStpJRVJQmpBaUbWzLYFHVBmeJzdLSX3frxfoIQde-Cha4zA4xT0EwxyQTnKY45-vEP2ibTQzouUQUpOU9xJYrtKevHEDw0eutdb_yjpkTvOtGt3nWid51oIjR5ueL7q_S06aF-__JWQgJO9wCkKB4ceB1sqiCl6TzYqOvR_U__GYE9mwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2840633683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Saxena, Monica ; Bloos, Sean M. ; Graber-Naidich, Anna ; Sundaram, Vandana ; Pasao, Melissa ; Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Monica ; Bloos, Sean M. ; Graber-Naidich, Anna ; Sundaram, Vandana ; Pasao, Melissa ; Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creatorcontrib><description>A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department.
We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality.
The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA.
There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37327683</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ACS ; Acute coronary syndromes ; Angina ; Angina pectoris ; Authorship ; Biomarkers ; Cardiac catheterization ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Emergency department ; Emergency medical care ; Heart attacks ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Intubation ; Ischemia ; Medical imaging ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; NSTEMI ; Patients ; Resource utilization ; Risk factors ; Software ; Writing</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023-08, Vol.70, p.171-174</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37327683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloos, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber-Naidich, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Vandana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasao, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department.
We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality.
The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA.
There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.</description><subject>ACS</subject><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Angina</subject><subject>Angina pectoris</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>NSTEMI</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVRmm_QNdVJa6YZPgRxw7CAmhYYCRaLtg1K3lcW6E0zwG20GCX4-HARZddHVl6fO595yD0DdKckpoedzmpoU-Z4TxnIicMPUBzajgLFNU0o9oRiQXWSmFPECHIbSEUFqI4jM64JIzWSo-Q9Mf452JbhywG_D54hZv0wuGiO_GsHXRdNhDGCdvAU_Rde7pBT7Bq4BdxNH1gJvRY1M_mMFCjX_drpc_V9i78BeH6BPdOPu-IN4BXl6cfUGfGtMF-Po652h9uVwvrrOb31erxflNZrkqYmYoZ1ZxVjWlquvKNLxMlorkQzWWCWYLqgStpJRVJQmpBaUbWzLYFHVBmeJzdLSX3frxfoIQde-Cha4zA4xT0EwxyQTnKY45-vEP2ibTQzouUQUpOU9xJYrtKevHEDw0eutdb_yjpkTvOtGt3nWid51oIjR5ueL7q_S06aF-__JWQgJO9wCkKB4ceB1sqiCl6TzYqOvR_U__GYE9mwg</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Saxena, Monica</creator><creator>Bloos, Sean M.</creator><creator>Graber-Naidich, Anna</creator><creator>Sundaram, Vandana</creator><creator>Pasao, Melissa</creator><creator>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</title><author>Saxena, Monica ; Bloos, Sean M. ; Graber-Naidich, Anna ; Sundaram, Vandana ; Pasao, Melissa ; Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>ACS</topic><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Angina</topic><topic>Angina pectoris</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>NSTEMI</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saxena, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloos, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graber-Naidich, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Vandana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasao, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saxena, Monica</au><au>Bloos, Sean M.</au><au>Graber-Naidich, Anna</au><au>Sundaram, Vandana</au><au>Pasao, Melissa</au><au>Yiadom, Maame Yaa A.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>171</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>171-174</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department.
We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality.
The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA.
There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37327683</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-6757 |
ispartof | The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023-08, Vol.70, p.171-174 |
issn | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2827253337 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | ACS Acute coronary syndromes Angina Angina pectoris Authorship Biomarkers Cardiac catheterization Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Emergency department Emergency medical care Heart attacks Hospitalization Hospitals Intubation Ischemia Medical imaging Mortality Myocardial infarction NSTEMI Patients Resource utilization Risk factors Software Writing |
title | Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A22%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20ACS%20patient%20hospital%20resource%20utilization:%20Is%20it%20time%20for%20advanced%20NSTEMI%20risk%20stratification%20in%20the%20ED?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Saxena,%20Monica&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=171-174&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2840633683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-a132c8329f68dd9af3607340018fc252c41851977799700d511bc62eb4d41283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2840633683&rft_id=info:pmid/37327683&rfr_iscdi=true |