Loading…
KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder
Objectives This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory. Methods This was...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bipolar disorders 2024-02, Vol.26 (1), p.84-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713 |
container_end_page | 92 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Bipolar disorders |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Pahwa, Mehak McElroy, Susan L. Priesmeyer, Richard Siegel, Gregg Siegel, Phyllis Nuss, Sharon Bowden, Charles L. El‐Mallakh, Rif S. |
description | Objectives
This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory.
Methods
This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study.
Results
Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups.
Conclusions
This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bdi.13362 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2828362389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2828362389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQJDawaGt78nDYlfKqqNQFsLbsxKGu0jjYqaru-AS-kS_BNIUFErOZq9HR1eggdErwgPgZylwPCEBM91CXQJr2o5iw_W1mPodJBx05t8CYxBRHh6gDCYSYkqiLZo-T2dNVMArcUtimnptKBaKug8LYwKmy-Hz_WJpKN8bq6nV7rUWjVdW4YK2beSB1bUphg1w7Y3Nlj9FBIUqnTna7h17ubp_HD_3p7H4yHk37GRCgfZB5rEKcyghYJPJMSgoRprEoCEtxxopEAQiIWagwTWWeQEKiuIAUJ0TKhEAPXbS9tTVvK-UavtQuU2UpKmVWjlNGmRcCLPXo-R90YVa28t9xmlJIGGMe7KHLlsqscc6qgtdWeycbTjD_tsy9Zb617NmzXeNKLlX-S_5o9cCwBda6VJv_m_j1zaSt_AIYkoUK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923788862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Pahwa, Mehak ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Priesmeyer, Richard ; Siegel, Gregg ; Siegel, Phyllis ; Nuss, Sharon ; Bowden, Charles L. ; El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pahwa, Mehak ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Priesmeyer, Richard ; Siegel, Gregg ; Siegel, Phyllis ; Nuss, Sharon ; Bowden, Charles L. ; El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory.
Methods
This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study.
Results
Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups.
Conclusions
This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1398-5647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-5618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37340215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>app ; bipolar ; Bipolar Disorder ; eMoods ; Humans ; KIOS ; Mobile Applications ; Nonlinear systems ; Patient satisfaction ; Self-Management ; self‐monitoring ; Smartphone ; Smartphones ; Software</subject><ispartof>Bipolar disorders, 2024-02, Vol.26 (1), p.84-92</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4992-8016 ; 0000-0002-3559-2590</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pahwa, Mehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priesmeyer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creatorcontrib><title>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</title><title>Bipolar disorders</title><addtitle>Bipolar Disord</addtitle><description>Objectives
This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory.
Methods
This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study.
Results
Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups.
Conclusions
This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).</description><subject>app</subject><subject>bipolar</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder</subject><subject>eMoods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>KIOS</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Self-Management</subject><subject>self‐monitoring</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1398-5647</issn><issn>1399-5618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQJDawaGt78nDYlfKqqNQFsLbsxKGu0jjYqaru-AS-kS_BNIUFErOZq9HR1eggdErwgPgZylwPCEBM91CXQJr2o5iw_W1mPodJBx05t8CYxBRHh6gDCYSYkqiLZo-T2dNVMArcUtimnptKBaKug8LYwKmy-Hz_WJpKN8bq6nV7rUWjVdW4YK2beSB1bUphg1w7Y3Nlj9FBIUqnTna7h17ubp_HD_3p7H4yHk37GRCgfZB5rEKcyghYJPJMSgoRprEoCEtxxopEAQiIWagwTWWeQEKiuIAUJ0TKhEAPXbS9tTVvK-UavtQuU2UpKmVWjlNGmRcCLPXo-R90YVa28t9xmlJIGGMe7KHLlsqscc6qgtdWeycbTjD_tsy9Zb617NmzXeNKLlX-S_5o9cCwBda6VJv_m_j1zaSt_AIYkoUK</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Pahwa, Mehak</creator><creator>McElroy, Susan L.</creator><creator>Priesmeyer, Richard</creator><creator>Siegel, Gregg</creator><creator>Siegel, Phyllis</creator><creator>Nuss, Sharon</creator><creator>Bowden, Charles L.</creator><creator>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-8016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-2590</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</title><author>Pahwa, Mehak ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Priesmeyer, Richard ; Siegel, Gregg ; Siegel, Phyllis ; Nuss, Sharon ; Bowden, Charles L. ; El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>app</topic><topic>bipolar</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder</topic><topic>eMoods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>KIOS</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Self-Management</topic><topic>self‐monitoring</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pahwa, Mehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priesmeyer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bipolar disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pahwa, Mehak</au><au>McElroy, Susan L.</au><au>Priesmeyer, Richard</au><au>Siegel, Gregg</au><au>Siegel, Phyllis</au><au>Nuss, Sharon</au><au>Bowden, Charles L.</au><au>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</atitle><jtitle>Bipolar disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Bipolar Disord</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>84-92</pages><issn>1398-5647</issn><eissn>1399-5618</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory.
Methods
This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study.
Results
Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups.
Conclusions
This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37340215</pmid><doi>10.1111/bdi.13362</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-8016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-2590</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1398-5647 |
ispartof | Bipolar disorders, 2024-02, Vol.26 (1), p.84-92 |
issn | 1398-5647 1399-5618 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2828362389 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | app bipolar Bipolar Disorder eMoods Humans KIOS Mobile Applications Nonlinear systems Patient satisfaction Self-Management self‐monitoring Smartphone Smartphones Software |
title | KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=KIOS:%20A%20smartphone%20app%20for%20self%E2%80%90monitoring%20for%20patients%20with%20bipolar%20disorder&rft.jtitle=Bipolar%20disorders&rft.au=Pahwa,%20Mehak&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=84-92&rft.issn=1398-5647&rft.eissn=1399-5618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bdi.13362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2828362389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923788862&rft_id=info:pmid/37340215&rfr_iscdi=true |