Loading…

KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder

Objectives This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory. Methods This was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bipolar disorders 2024-02, Vol.26 (1), p.84-92
Main Authors: Pahwa, Mehak, McElroy, Susan L., Priesmeyer, Richard, Siegel, Gregg, Siegel, Phyllis, Nuss, Sharon, Bowden, Charles L., El‐Mallakh, Rif S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 84
container_title Bipolar disorders
container_volume 26
creator Pahwa, Mehak
McElroy, Susan L.
Priesmeyer, Richard
Siegel, Gregg
Siegel, Phyllis
Nuss, Sharon
Bowden, Charles L.
El‐Mallakh, Rif S.
description Objectives This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory. Methods This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study. Results Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups. Conclusions This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bdi.13362
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2828362389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2828362389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQJDawaGt78nDYlfKqqNQFsLbsxKGu0jjYqaru-AS-kS_BNIUFErOZq9HR1eggdErwgPgZylwPCEBM91CXQJr2o5iw_W1mPodJBx05t8CYxBRHh6gDCYSYkqiLZo-T2dNVMArcUtimnptKBaKug8LYwKmy-Hz_WJpKN8bq6nV7rUWjVdW4YK2beSB1bUphg1w7Y3Nlj9FBIUqnTna7h17ubp_HD_3p7H4yHk37GRCgfZB5rEKcyghYJPJMSgoRprEoCEtxxopEAQiIWagwTWWeQEKiuIAUJ0TKhEAPXbS9tTVvK-UavtQuU2UpKmVWjlNGmRcCLPXo-R90YVa28t9xmlJIGGMe7KHLlsqscc6qgtdWeycbTjD_tsy9Zb617NmzXeNKLlX-S_5o9cCwBda6VJv_m_j1zaSt_AIYkoUK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923788862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pahwa, Mehak ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Priesmeyer, Richard ; Siegel, Gregg ; Siegel, Phyllis ; Nuss, Sharon ; Bowden, Charles L. ; El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pahwa, Mehak ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Priesmeyer, Richard ; Siegel, Gregg ; Siegel, Phyllis ; Nuss, Sharon ; Bowden, Charles L. ; El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory. Methods This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study. Results Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups. Conclusions This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1398-5647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-5618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37340215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>app ; bipolar ; Bipolar Disorder ; eMoods ; Humans ; KIOS ; Mobile Applications ; Nonlinear systems ; Patient satisfaction ; Self-Management ; self‐monitoring ; Smartphone ; Smartphones ; Software</subject><ispartof>Bipolar disorders, 2024-02, Vol.26 (1), p.84-92</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4992-8016 ; 0000-0002-3559-2590</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pahwa, Mehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priesmeyer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creatorcontrib><title>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</title><title>Bipolar disorders</title><addtitle>Bipolar Disord</addtitle><description>Objectives This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory. Methods This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study. Results Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups. Conclusions This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).</description><subject>app</subject><subject>bipolar</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder</subject><subject>eMoods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>KIOS</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Self-Management</subject><subject>self‐monitoring</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1398-5647</issn><issn>1399-5618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQJDawaGt78nDYlfKqqNQFsLbsxKGu0jjYqaru-AS-kS_BNIUFErOZq9HR1eggdErwgPgZylwPCEBM91CXQJr2o5iw_W1mPodJBx05t8CYxBRHh6gDCYSYkqiLZo-T2dNVMArcUtimnptKBaKug8LYwKmy-Hz_WJpKN8bq6nV7rUWjVdW4YK2beSB1bUphg1w7Y3Nlj9FBIUqnTna7h17ubp_HD_3p7H4yHk37GRCgfZB5rEKcyghYJPJMSgoRprEoCEtxxopEAQiIWagwTWWeQEKiuIAUJ0TKhEAPXbS9tTVvK-UavtQuU2UpKmVWjlNGmRcCLPXo-R90YVa28t9xmlJIGGMe7KHLlsqscc6qgtdWeycbTjD_tsy9Zb617NmzXeNKLlX-S_5o9cCwBda6VJv_m_j1zaSt_AIYkoUK</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Pahwa, Mehak</creator><creator>McElroy, Susan L.</creator><creator>Priesmeyer, Richard</creator><creator>Siegel, Gregg</creator><creator>Siegel, Phyllis</creator><creator>Nuss, Sharon</creator><creator>Bowden, Charles L.</creator><creator>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-8016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-2590</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</title><author>Pahwa, Mehak ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Priesmeyer, Richard ; Siegel, Gregg ; Siegel, Phyllis ; Nuss, Sharon ; Bowden, Charles L. ; El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>app</topic><topic>bipolar</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder</topic><topic>eMoods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>KIOS</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Self-Management</topic><topic>self‐monitoring</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pahwa, Mehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Priesmeyer, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Gregg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuss, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bipolar disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pahwa, Mehak</au><au>McElroy, Susan L.</au><au>Priesmeyer, Richard</au><au>Siegel, Gregg</au><au>Siegel, Phyllis</au><au>Nuss, Sharon</au><au>Bowden, Charles L.</au><au>El‐Mallakh, Rif S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder</atitle><jtitle>Bipolar disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Bipolar Disord</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>84-92</pages><issn>1398-5647</issn><eissn>1399-5618</eissn><abstract>Objectives This study examined the use of a self‐monitoring/self‐management smartphone application (app) for patients with bipolar disorder. The app was specifically designed with patient‐centered computational software system based on concepts from nonlinear systems (chaos) theory. Methods This was a randomized, active comparator study of use of the KIOS app compared to an existing free app that has high utilization rates known as eMoods, over 52 weeks, and performed in three academic centers. Patients were evaluated monthly utilizing the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Schedule (BISS). The primary outcome measure was the persistence of using the app over the year of the study. Results Patients assigned to KIOS persisted in the study longer than those assigned to eMoods; 57 patients (87.70%) in the KIOS group versus 42 (73.69%) in the eMoods group completed the study (p = 0.03). By 52 weeks, significantly more of KIOS group (84.4%) versus eMoods group (54%) entered data into their programs (χ2 = 14.2, df = 1, p = 0.0002). Patient satisfaction for KIOS was greater (F = 5.21, df = 1, 108, p = 0.025) with a standardized effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.41. There was no difference in clinical outcome at the end of the study between the two groups. Conclusions This is the first randomized comparison study comparing two apps for the self‐monitoring/self‐management of bipolar disorder. The study revealed greater patient satisfaction and greater adherence to a patient‐centered software program (KIOS) than a monitoring program that does not provide feedback (eMoods).</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37340215</pmid><doi>10.1111/bdi.13362</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-8016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-2590</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1398-5647
ispartof Bipolar disorders, 2024-02, Vol.26 (1), p.84-92
issn 1398-5647
1399-5618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2828362389
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects app
bipolar
Bipolar Disorder
eMoods
Humans
KIOS
Mobile Applications
Nonlinear systems
Patient satisfaction
Self-Management
self‐monitoring
Smartphone
Smartphones
Software
title KIOS: A smartphone app for self‐monitoring for patients with bipolar disorder
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=KIOS:%20A%20smartphone%20app%20for%20self%E2%80%90monitoring%20for%20patients%20with%20bipolar%20disorder&rft.jtitle=Bipolar%20disorders&rft.au=Pahwa,%20Mehak&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=84-92&rft.issn=1398-5647&rft.eissn=1399-5618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bdi.13362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2828362389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3132-3bd6e409b5385adcbb235026af1890c8f7e33a3684e029bd737156f39071bb713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923788862&rft_id=info:pmid/37340215&rfr_iscdi=true