‘Bowls are boring’: Investigating enrichment feeding for pet dogs and the perceived benefits and challenges

• Published in: Veterinary record 2024-02, Vol.194 (4), p.no-no
• Main Authors: Heys, Madeline, Lloyd, Imogen, Westgarth, Carri
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Dogs
• ISSN: 0042-4900; 2042-7670
• DOI: 10.1002/vetr.3169

Background Canine enrichment feeding (CEF) is recommended by canine professionals, yet research into its use by dog owners is absent. This study is the first to investigate who uses CEF and the perceived benefits and barriers. Methods A cross‐sectional survey advertised in July and August 2021 received 1750 usable responses about owner and dog demographics, feeding methods used, canine quality of life and behaviour (Mini‐Canine Behavioural Assessment and Research Questionnaire [C‐BARQ]). Results Kongs, chews and activity toys were the most popular forms of CEF. CEF was most often used for a treat, delivering meals and keeping dogs busy. Owners not using CEF were more likely to be male and older. Dogs not fed using CEF were more likely to be older, of working type and have lower exercise needs. Furthermore, they were less likely to show meal interest, dog‐directed fear or training difficulties. A common perceived benefit was mental stimulation; however, lack of time was commonly perceived to be a barrier. Certain feeding methods were associated with perceptions of reduced hunger and begging. Limitations The survey methodology means there is a risk of selection bias and conclusions cannot be drawn about causation. Conclusion CEF was perceived by most owners to benefit behavioural problems and reduce food seeking. Further research using experimental research designs is required to establish causality.