Loading…

Anti‐VEGF and steroid combination therapy relative to anti‐VEGF mono therapy for the treatment of refractory DME: A systematic review of efficacy and meta‐analysis of safety

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of combined anti‐VEGF and steroid therapy in treatment refractory DME patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of peer‐reviewed articles reporting on visual, anatomical and adverse outcomes to compare the efficacy and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2024-05, Vol.102 (3), p.e204-e214
Main Authors: Hatamnejad, Amin, Orr, Samantha, Dadak, Rohan, Khanani, Arshad, Singh, Rishi, Choudhry, Netan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373
container_end_page e214
container_issue 3
container_start_page e204
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 102
creator Hatamnejad, Amin
Orr, Samantha
Dadak, Rohan
Khanani, Arshad
Singh, Rishi
Choudhry, Netan
description The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of combined anti‐VEGF and steroid therapy in treatment refractory DME patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of peer‐reviewed articles reporting on visual, anatomical and adverse outcomes to compare the efficacy and safety of combined intravitreal anti‐VEGF/steroids versus anti‐VEGF monotherapy for refractory DME. Seven studies (4 RCTs and 3 observational studies) reporting on 452 eyes were included. Our systematic review showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective for anatomical outcomes in the treatment of resistant DME compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy in six studies. Two studies found that addition of intravitreal steroids promoted faster visual improvement, but not significantly better final visual outcomes compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy. Combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of IOP‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.42], p = 0.002) and cataract‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.71], p = 0.02). Our systematic review and meta‐analysis of seven studies and 452 eyes revealed that combination therapy of anti‐VEGF and steroid intravitreal drugs in the management of treatment refractory DME resulted in superior anatomical outcomes in all but one study. Combination therapy led to superior short‐term visual outcomes in two studies, while others reported no difference between treatment groups. Meta‐analysis revealed that combination therapy was associated with more adverse events. Future research should provide guidance on the standard definitions for treatment resistance and therapeutic alternatives for DME patients with sub‐optimal response to anti‐VEGF treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aos.15724
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2830215518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3034568474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOHDEQhi2UCAjJIheILGVDFgN2d_uV3QiGhwRikYCys2xPtWLU3Z7YHlDvOAJ34UY5STwMGaRI8calqq_-KtWP0EdKDmh5hyakA8pE1WyhXSoYm9SCyzebmP3YQe9SuiWEU86bbbRTi5ozruQuepoO2f9-eLyZnZ5gM8xxyhCDn2MXeusHk30YcP4J0SxGHKEriTvAORT2ta8PQ9hAbYirGOcIJvcwZBza0tlG43KIIz6-nH3FU5zGMqkvcq4U7zzcrzBoW--MG5836SGbMsEMphuTT6t6Mi3k8T1625ouwYeXfw9dn8y-H51NLq5Oz4-mFxNXs7qZMMIrqrgCSxpOqK0cc04J1TDOWmU5FbZRlpJKKTW3RHBlGZeycrKSAsqJ9tD-WncRw68lpKx7nxx0nRkgLJOuZE0qyhiVBf38D3oblrFsnnRN6jJRNqIp1Jc15WJIqdxEL6LvTRw1JXrlpC5O6mcnC_vpRXFpe5hvyL_WFeBwDdz7Dsb_K-np1be15B9NsKsj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034568474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti‐VEGF and steroid combination therapy relative to anti‐VEGF mono therapy for the treatment of refractory DME: A systematic review of efficacy and meta‐analysis of safety</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hatamnejad, Amin ; Orr, Samantha ; Dadak, Rohan ; Khanani, Arshad ; Singh, Rishi ; Choudhry, Netan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatamnejad, Amin ; Orr, Samantha ; Dadak, Rohan ; Khanani, Arshad ; Singh, Rishi ; Choudhry, Netan</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of combined anti‐VEGF and steroid therapy in treatment refractory DME patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of peer‐reviewed articles reporting on visual, anatomical and adverse outcomes to compare the efficacy and safety of combined intravitreal anti‐VEGF/steroids versus anti‐VEGF monotherapy for refractory DME. Seven studies (4 RCTs and 3 observational studies) reporting on 452 eyes were included. Our systematic review showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective for anatomical outcomes in the treatment of resistant DME compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy in six studies. Two studies found that addition of intravitreal steroids promoted faster visual improvement, but not significantly better final visual outcomes compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy. Combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of IOP‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.42], p = 0.002) and cataract‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.71], p = 0.02). Our systematic review and meta‐analysis of seven studies and 452 eyes revealed that combination therapy of anti‐VEGF and steroid intravitreal drugs in the management of treatment refractory DME resulted in superior anatomical outcomes in all but one study. Combination therapy led to superior short‐term visual outcomes in two studies, while others reported no difference between treatment groups. Meta‐analysis revealed that combination therapy was associated with more adverse events. Future research should provide guidance on the standard definitions for treatment resistance and therapeutic alternatives for DME patients with sub‐optimal response to anti‐VEGF treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aos.15724</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37365698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Cataracts ; Combination therapy ; Diabetic macular edema ; Diabetic Retinopathy - drug therapy ; DME ; Humans ; Intravitreal Injections ; Macular Edema - drug therapy ; Meta-analysis ; Refractory ; Retina ; Safety ; Steroid hormones ; Steroids ; Systematic review ; Treatment resistance ; Vascular endothelial growth factor ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2024-05, Vol.102 (3), p.e204-e214</ispartof><rights>2023 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2023 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5859-8162 ; 0000-0002-4714-738X ; 0000-0001-8928-5599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37365698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatamnejad, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadak, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanani, Arshad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhry, Netan</creatorcontrib><title>Anti‐VEGF and steroid combination therapy relative to anti‐VEGF mono therapy for the treatment of refractory DME: A systematic review of efficacy and meta‐analysis of safety</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of combined anti‐VEGF and steroid therapy in treatment refractory DME patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of peer‐reviewed articles reporting on visual, anatomical and adverse outcomes to compare the efficacy and safety of combined intravitreal anti‐VEGF/steroids versus anti‐VEGF monotherapy for refractory DME. Seven studies (4 RCTs and 3 observational studies) reporting on 452 eyes were included. Our systematic review showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective for anatomical outcomes in the treatment of resistant DME compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy in six studies. Two studies found that addition of intravitreal steroids promoted faster visual improvement, but not significantly better final visual outcomes compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy. Combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of IOP‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.42], p = 0.002) and cataract‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.71], p = 0.02). Our systematic review and meta‐analysis of seven studies and 452 eyes revealed that combination therapy of anti‐VEGF and steroid intravitreal drugs in the management of treatment refractory DME resulted in superior anatomical outcomes in all but one study. Combination therapy led to superior short‐term visual outcomes in two studies, while others reported no difference between treatment groups. Meta‐analysis revealed that combination therapy was associated with more adverse events. Future research should provide guidance on the standard definitions for treatment resistance and therapeutic alternatives for DME patients with sub‐optimal response to anti‐VEGF treatment.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Combination therapy</subject><subject>Diabetic macular edema</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - drug therapy</subject><subject>DME</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravitreal Injections</subject><subject>Macular Edema - drug therapy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Refractory</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Steroid hormones</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment resistance</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtOHDEQhi2UCAjJIheILGVDFgN2d_uV3QiGhwRikYCys2xPtWLU3Z7YHlDvOAJ34UY5STwMGaRI8calqq_-KtWP0EdKDmh5hyakA8pE1WyhXSoYm9SCyzebmP3YQe9SuiWEU86bbbRTi5ozruQuepoO2f9-eLyZnZ5gM8xxyhCDn2MXeusHk30YcP4J0SxGHKEriTvAORT2ta8PQ9hAbYirGOcIJvcwZBza0tlG43KIIz6-nH3FU5zGMqkvcq4U7zzcrzBoW--MG5836SGbMsEMphuTT6t6Mi3k8T1625ouwYeXfw9dn8y-H51NLq5Oz4-mFxNXs7qZMMIrqrgCSxpOqK0cc04J1TDOWmU5FbZRlpJKKTW3RHBlGZeycrKSAsqJ9tD-WncRw68lpKx7nxx0nRkgLJOuZE0qyhiVBf38D3oblrFsnnRN6jJRNqIp1Jc15WJIqdxEL6LvTRw1JXrlpC5O6mcnC_vpRXFpe5hvyL_WFeBwDdz7Dsb_K-np1be15B9NsKsj</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Hatamnejad, Amin</creator><creator>Orr, Samantha</creator><creator>Dadak, Rohan</creator><creator>Khanani, Arshad</creator><creator>Singh, Rishi</creator><creator>Choudhry, Netan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-8162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-738X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-5599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Anti‐VEGF and steroid combination therapy relative to anti‐VEGF mono therapy for the treatment of refractory DME: A systematic review of efficacy and meta‐analysis of safety</title><author>Hatamnejad, Amin ; Orr, Samantha ; Dadak, Rohan ; Khanani, Arshad ; Singh, Rishi ; Choudhry, Netan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Combination therapy</topic><topic>Diabetic macular edema</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - drug therapy</topic><topic>DME</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravitreal Injections</topic><topic>Macular Edema - drug therapy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Refractory</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Steroid hormones</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment resistance</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatamnejad, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dadak, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanani, Arshad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhry, Netan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatamnejad, Amin</au><au>Orr, Samantha</au><au>Dadak, Rohan</au><au>Khanani, Arshad</au><au>Singh, Rishi</au><au>Choudhry, Netan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti‐VEGF and steroid combination therapy relative to anti‐VEGF mono therapy for the treatment of refractory DME: A systematic review of efficacy and meta‐analysis of safety</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e204</spage><epage>e214</epage><pages>e204-e214</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of combined anti‐VEGF and steroid therapy in treatment refractory DME patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of peer‐reviewed articles reporting on visual, anatomical and adverse outcomes to compare the efficacy and safety of combined intravitreal anti‐VEGF/steroids versus anti‐VEGF monotherapy for refractory DME. Seven studies (4 RCTs and 3 observational studies) reporting on 452 eyes were included. Our systematic review showed that combination therapy is significantly more effective for anatomical outcomes in the treatment of resistant DME compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy in six studies. Two studies found that addition of intravitreal steroids promoted faster visual improvement, but not significantly better final visual outcomes compared to anti‐VEGF monotherapy. Combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of IOP‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.42], p = 0.002) and cataract‐related adverse events (RR = 0.10, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.71], p = 0.02). Our systematic review and meta‐analysis of seven studies and 452 eyes revealed that combination therapy of anti‐VEGF and steroid intravitreal drugs in the management of treatment refractory DME resulted in superior anatomical outcomes in all but one study. Combination therapy led to superior short‐term visual outcomes in two studies, while others reported no difference between treatment groups. Meta‐analysis revealed that combination therapy was associated with more adverse events. Future research should provide guidance on the standard definitions for treatment resistance and therapeutic alternatives for DME patients with sub‐optimal response to anti‐VEGF treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37365698</pmid><doi>10.1111/aos.15724</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-8162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-738X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-5599</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2024-05, Vol.102 (3), p.e204-e214
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2830215518
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adverse events
Cataracts
Combination therapy
Diabetic macular edema
Diabetic Retinopathy - drug therapy
DME
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Macular Edema - drug therapy
Meta-analysis
Refractory
Retina
Safety
Steroid hormones
Steroids
Systematic review
Treatment resistance
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
title Anti‐VEGF and steroid combination therapy relative to anti‐VEGF mono therapy for the treatment of refractory DME: A systematic review of efficacy and meta‐analysis of safety
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti%E2%80%90VEGF%20and%20steroid%20combination%20therapy%20relative%20to%20anti%E2%80%90VEGF%20mono%20therapy%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20refractory%20DME:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20efficacy%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20safety&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Hatamnejad,%20Amin&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e204&rft.epage=e214&rft.pages=e204-e214&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aos.15724&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034568474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-50621969eb04601b2c5cc9794565f9b617b49b102999db0769b56882c8287e373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034568474&rft_id=info:pmid/37365698&rfr_iscdi=true