Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review

• Published in: Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2023-12, Vol.35 (8), p.1205-1217
• Main Authors: Pachiou, Aspasia, Zervou, Evangelia, Tsirogiannis, Panagiotis, Sykaras, Nikitas, Tortopidis, Dimitrios, Kourtis, Stefanos
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Case reports; Clinical trials; Dental implants; Reviews; Scanning; Systematic review; Titanium alloys
• ISSN: 1496-4155; 1708-8240
• DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13074

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of the characteristics of intraoral scan bodies (ISBs) on the accuracy of intraoral scanning. An electronic search was conducted through PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus and Cochrane Library, up to March 2023. The literature search intended to retrieve all relevant clinical and in vitro studies about the effect that the various properties of ISBs may have on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of intraoral scanning. Only publications in English language were selected with animal studies, case reports, case series, technique presentation articles and expert opinions being excluded. A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. They were published between 2019 and 2023 and were all in vitro studies. Among the parameters described, the scan body material, position, geometry, height, diameter, and fixation torque were evaluated. The most common materials used for ISBs were polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium alloys. The diameter and position of ISBs seemed to affect the trueness of implant impressions. Subgingival implant position and decreased ISB height affected negatively the trueness of scanning. Geometrical characteristics of ISBs also affect the implant impression accuracy, especially the bevel location and the types of designing modifications. The characteristics of the currently used ISBs vary widely and the available scientific evidence is not yet conclusive about the optimal design of ISB. The implant impression accuracy achieved by any of the studied parameters is encouraging. Clinical studies are however necessary for more concrete conclusions. ISBs play a vital role in the digital workflow and influence significantly the accuracy and fit of implant restorations. More clinical trials are needed in order to conclude to the optimal characteristics of ISBs which would further enhance the success of the restorations.