Loading…

Clinical outcomes of intensive versus less intensive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Physicians determine the treatment regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer on a case-by-case bases, according to the individual disease characteristics. We retrospectively compared the baseline characteristics and efficacies of first-line treatment among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Future oncology (London, England) England), 2023-12, Vol.19 (39), p.2569-2583
Main Authors: Yamazaki, Kentaro, Yuki, Satoshi, Oki, Eiji, Sano, Fumikazu, Makishima, Misako, Aoki, Kenichi, Hamano, Tetsutaro, Yamamoto, Kouji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7720148a770ecaca260d1d05c3c0267e28d603a65c6236f3c7d146a1957acf813
container_end_page 2583
container_issue 39
container_start_page 2569
container_title Future oncology (London, England)
container_volume 19
creator Yamazaki, Kentaro
Yuki, Satoshi
Oki, Eiji
Sano, Fumikazu
Makishima, Misako
Aoki, Kenichi
Hamano, Tetsutaro
Yamamoto, Kouji
description Physicians determine the treatment regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer on a case-by-case bases, according to the individual disease characteristics. We retrospectively compared the baseline characteristics and efficacies of first-line treatment among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received intensive therapy involving fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, potentially with molecularly targeted agents as well, versus less intensive fluoropyrimidine and/or bevacizumab therapy. Data were collected from a medical claims database. The efficacy outcomes were: time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival. The less intensive therapy group (n = 633) had higher median age, lower daily activity levels and shorter time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival than the intensive therapy group (n = 3829). Combination therapy with molecularly targeted agents and bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy outcomes in the intensive and less intensive groups, respectively. Patient age and daily activity levels were important factors for determining treatment intensity. In this study we performed a real-world data analysis of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer that had spread to other parts of patients’ bodies, by investigating the medical records of 4462 patients. We wanted to see how well different treatments worked and what kinds of patients received them. We found that the most important factors when choosing between different treatments were the patient’s age and how well they could perform their everyday tasks. We found that using specialized medicines in the intensive treatment group, and a drug called bevacizumab in the less intensive group, resulted in better patient outcomes. In real-world data on first-line treatment of patients with mCRC, age and daily activity levels were key in choosing intensive or less intensive therapy. Molecularly targeted agents improved outcomes with intensive therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.2217/fon-2022-1284
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2832577570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2832577570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7720148a770ecaca260d1d05c3c0267e28d603a65c6236f3c7d146a1957acf813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtrHDEQh4VJ8LtMa1Smka3HrrRXmiNOAgY3di2U2RFW2F2dNVqD_3vrOCekSTUPvvnBfIx9UfJaa-VuYl6ElloLpYfuiJ0q13ViMFJ9an3nNsLaTXfCzoh-S9k508tjdmKcGZw27pTN2yktCcLE81ohz0g8R56WigulV-SvWGglPiHRP9uYClXRLpHDM865PmMJuzcec-Ez1kA11AQc8pQLQm3pEBbAcsE-xzARXn7Uc_Z09-1x-0PcP3z_ub29F2DMUIVzWqpuCM5JhABBWzmqUfZgQGrrUA-jlSbYHqw2Nhpwo-psUJveBYiDMufs6yF3V_LLilT9nAhwmsKCeSWvB6N753onGyoOKJRMVDD6XUlzKG9eSb837Jthvzfs94Ybf_URvf6acfxL_1HagM0BiGtdCxIkbK_7w9QuEjRt_wl_BwGgjGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2832577570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical outcomes of intensive versus less intensive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><creator>Yamazaki, Kentaro ; Yuki, Satoshi ; Oki, Eiji ; Sano, Fumikazu ; Makishima, Misako ; Aoki, Kenichi ; Hamano, Tetsutaro ; Yamamoto, Kouji</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Kentaro ; Yuki, Satoshi ; Oki, Eiji ; Sano, Fumikazu ; Makishima, Misako ; Aoki, Kenichi ; Hamano, Tetsutaro ; Yamamoto, Kouji</creatorcontrib><description>Physicians determine the treatment regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer on a case-by-case bases, according to the individual disease characteristics. We retrospectively compared the baseline characteristics and efficacies of first-line treatment among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received intensive therapy involving fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, potentially with molecularly targeted agents as well, versus less intensive fluoropyrimidine and/or bevacizumab therapy. Data were collected from a medical claims database. The efficacy outcomes were: time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival. The less intensive therapy group (n = 633) had higher median age, lower daily activity levels and shorter time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival than the intensive therapy group (n = 3829). Combination therapy with molecularly targeted agents and bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy outcomes in the intensive and less intensive groups, respectively. Patient age and daily activity levels were important factors for determining treatment intensity. In this study we performed a real-world data analysis of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer that had spread to other parts of patients’ bodies, by investigating the medical records of 4462 patients. We wanted to see how well different treatments worked and what kinds of patients received them. We found that the most important factors when choosing between different treatments were the patient’s age and how well they could perform their everyday tasks. We found that using specialized medicines in the intensive treatment group, and a drug called bevacizumab in the less intensive group, resulted in better patient outcomes. In real-world data on first-line treatment of patients with mCRC, age and daily activity levels were key in choosing intensive or less intensive therapy. Molecularly targeted agents improved outcomes with intensive therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-8301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1284</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37387237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Future Medicine Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Bevacizumab ; Camptothecin - therapeutic use ; Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; first-line treatment ; Fluorouracil - therapeutic use ; Humans ; intensive therapy ; less intensive therapy ; Leucovorin - therapeutic use ; molecularly targeted agents ; overall survival ; real-world data ; Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; time to treatment failure</subject><ispartof>Future oncology (London, England), 2023-12, Vol.19 (39), p.2569-2583</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7720148a770ecaca260d1d05c3c0267e28d603a65c6236f3c7d146a1957acf813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6269-9345</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37387237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuki, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oki, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Fumikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makishima, Misako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamano, Tetsutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kouji</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical outcomes of intensive versus less intensive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer</title><title>Future oncology (London, England)</title><addtitle>Future Oncol</addtitle><description>Physicians determine the treatment regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer on a case-by-case bases, according to the individual disease characteristics. We retrospectively compared the baseline characteristics and efficacies of first-line treatment among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received intensive therapy involving fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, potentially with molecularly targeted agents as well, versus less intensive fluoropyrimidine and/or bevacizumab therapy. Data were collected from a medical claims database. The efficacy outcomes were: time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival. The less intensive therapy group (n = 633) had higher median age, lower daily activity levels and shorter time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival than the intensive therapy group (n = 3829). Combination therapy with molecularly targeted agents and bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy outcomes in the intensive and less intensive groups, respectively. Patient age and daily activity levels were important factors for determining treatment intensity. In this study we performed a real-world data analysis of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer that had spread to other parts of patients’ bodies, by investigating the medical records of 4462 patients. We wanted to see how well different treatments worked and what kinds of patients received them. We found that the most important factors when choosing between different treatments were the patient’s age and how well they could perform their everyday tasks. We found that using specialized medicines in the intensive treatment group, and a drug called bevacizumab in the less intensive group, resulted in better patient outcomes. In real-world data on first-line treatment of patients with mCRC, age and daily activity levels were key in choosing intensive or less intensive therapy. Molecularly targeted agents improved outcomes with intensive therapy.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bevacizumab</subject><subject>Camptothecin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>first-line treatment</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intensive therapy</subject><subject>less intensive therapy</subject><subject>Leucovorin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>molecularly targeted agents</subject><subject>overall survival</subject><subject>real-world data</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>time to treatment failure</subject><issn>1479-6694</issn><issn>1744-8301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtrHDEQh4VJ8LtMa1Smka3HrrRXmiNOAgY3di2U2RFW2F2dNVqD_3vrOCekSTUPvvnBfIx9UfJaa-VuYl6ElloLpYfuiJ0q13ViMFJ9an3nNsLaTXfCzoh-S9k508tjdmKcGZw27pTN2yktCcLE81ohz0g8R56WigulV-SvWGglPiHRP9uYClXRLpHDM865PmMJuzcec-Ez1kA11AQc8pQLQm3pEBbAcsE-xzARXn7Uc_Z09-1x-0PcP3z_ub29F2DMUIVzWqpuCM5JhABBWzmqUfZgQGrrUA-jlSbYHqw2Nhpwo-psUJveBYiDMufs6yF3V_LLilT9nAhwmsKCeSWvB6N753onGyoOKJRMVDD6XUlzKG9eSb837Jthvzfs94Ybf_URvf6acfxL_1HagM0BiGtdCxIkbK_7w9QuEjRt_wl_BwGgjGk</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Yamazaki, Kentaro</creator><creator>Yuki, Satoshi</creator><creator>Oki, Eiji</creator><creator>Sano, Fumikazu</creator><creator>Makishima, Misako</creator><creator>Aoki, Kenichi</creator><creator>Hamano, Tetsutaro</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Kouji</creator><general>Future Medicine Ltd</general><scope>FUMOA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-9345</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Clinical outcomes of intensive versus less intensive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer</title><author>Yamazaki, Kentaro ; Yuki, Satoshi ; Oki, Eiji ; Sano, Fumikazu ; Makishima, Misako ; Aoki, Kenichi ; Hamano, Tetsutaro ; Yamamoto, Kouji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7720148a770ecaca260d1d05c3c0267e28d603a65c6236f3c7d146a1957acf813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bevacizumab</topic><topic>Camptothecin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>first-line treatment</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intensive therapy</topic><topic>less intensive therapy</topic><topic>Leucovorin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>molecularly targeted agents</topic><topic>overall survival</topic><topic>real-world data</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>time to treatment failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuki, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oki, Eiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Fumikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makishima, Misako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamano, Tetsutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kouji</creatorcontrib><collection>Future Medicine (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Future oncology (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamazaki, Kentaro</au><au>Yuki, Satoshi</au><au>Oki, Eiji</au><au>Sano, Fumikazu</au><au>Makishima, Misako</au><au>Aoki, Kenichi</au><au>Hamano, Tetsutaro</au><au>Yamamoto, Kouji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical outcomes of intensive versus less intensive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Future oncology (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Future Oncol</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>2569</spage><epage>2583</epage><pages>2569-2583</pages><issn>1479-6694</issn><eissn>1744-8301</eissn><abstract>Physicians determine the treatment regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer on a case-by-case bases, according to the individual disease characteristics. We retrospectively compared the baseline characteristics and efficacies of first-line treatment among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received intensive therapy involving fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, potentially with molecularly targeted agents as well, versus less intensive fluoropyrimidine and/or bevacizumab therapy. Data were collected from a medical claims database. The efficacy outcomes were: time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival. The less intensive therapy group (n = 633) had higher median age, lower daily activity levels and shorter time to treatment failure, time to first subsequent therapy and overall survival than the intensive therapy group (n = 3829). Combination therapy with molecularly targeted agents and bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy outcomes in the intensive and less intensive groups, respectively. Patient age and daily activity levels were important factors for determining treatment intensity. In this study we performed a real-world data analysis of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer that had spread to other parts of patients’ bodies, by investigating the medical records of 4462 patients. We wanted to see how well different treatments worked and what kinds of patients received them. We found that the most important factors when choosing between different treatments were the patient’s age and how well they could perform their everyday tasks. We found that using specialized medicines in the intensive treatment group, and a drug called bevacizumab in the less intensive group, resulted in better patient outcomes. In real-world data on first-line treatment of patients with mCRC, age and daily activity levels were key in choosing intensive or less intensive therapy. Molecularly targeted agents improved outcomes with intensive therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Future Medicine Ltd</pub><pmid>37387237</pmid><doi>10.2217/fon-2022-1284</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-9345</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-6694
ispartof Future oncology (London, England), 2023-12, Vol.19 (39), p.2569-2583
issn 1479-6694
1744-8301
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2832577570
source PubMed (Medline)
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects
Bevacizumab
Camptothecin - therapeutic use
Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy
colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
first-line treatment
Fluorouracil - therapeutic use
Humans
intensive therapy
less intensive therapy
Leucovorin - therapeutic use
molecularly targeted agents
overall survival
real-world data
Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Retrospective Studies
time to treatment failure
title Clinical outcomes of intensive versus less intensive first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20outcomes%20of%20intensive%20versus%20less%20intensive%20first-line%20chemotherapy%20for%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Future%20oncology%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Yamazaki,%20Kentaro&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=2569&rft.epage=2583&rft.pages=2569-2583&rft.issn=1479-6694&rft.eissn=1744-8301&rft_id=info:doi/10.2217/fon-2022-1284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2832577570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7720148a770ecaca260d1d05c3c0267e28d603a65c6236f3c7d146a1957acf813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2832577570&rft_id=info:pmid/37387237&rfr_iscdi=true