Loading…
Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs
This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from t...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine 2023-12, Vol.36 (2), p.2230511-2230511 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3 |
container_end_page | 2230511 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 2230511 |
container_title | The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Celik, Ebru Yildiz, Abdullah Burak Guler Cekic, Sebile Unal, Ceren Ayhan, Isil Melekoglu, Rauf Gursoy, Tugba |
description | This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I
2
score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario").
The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2833996412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2833996412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRB7wCSAv2fTgZ3cPK6JRCEhBiaKwttx2GYzadnB1TzQfwT_jYSYsWblcOnWvqm7TvGF0xehA3zPZdz1Vw4pTLlacC6oYe9ac7vutXCv5_FjvoZPmDPEnpZxJql42J6KXdGBMnDa_L2IKOSS_YMiJbHFFcDbJmeJINMl8hwhpJj4XMv8AgmBzcmQuIQLOUMjt7d3N1w_EENzVfzRzsKTANsAjqSokwmzaKjPtMCDJnuQRoWwrlmuzWi0uAP5F7zb3-Kp54c2E8Pr4njffPl3ebz631zdXXzYX162VTMztWhlwowfLO-_H0YHrvGKSd4xRJwej7CDAOlBW9RT6UQoYqBuV5EIxqkZx3rw76D6U_Gupm-gY0MI0mQR5Qc0HIdbrTjJeUXVAbcmIBbx-qMubstOM6n0S-ikJvU9CH5Ooc2-PFssYwf2bejp9BT4egHr8XKJ5zGVyeja7KRdfTLIBtfi_xx_B3Jqp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833996412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><creator>Celik, Ebru ; Yildiz, Abdullah Burak ; Guler Cekic, Sebile ; Unal, Ceren ; Ayhan, Isil ; Melekoglu, Rauf ; Gursoy, Tugba</creator><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ebru ; Yildiz, Abdullah Burak ; Guler Cekic, Sebile ; Unal, Ceren ; Ayhan, Isil ; Melekoglu, Rauf ; Gursoy, Tugba</creatorcontrib><description>This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I
2
score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario").
The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-7058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37408113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>amnioinfusion ; Child ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Female ; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy ; healthy survival ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; oligohydramnios ; Oligohydramnios - therapy ; perinatal mortality ; PPROM ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><ispartof>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2023-12, Vol.36 (2), p.2230511-2230511</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3485-5843 ; 0000-0002-8160-7853 ; 0000-0002-6084-4067 ; 0000-0001-8921-2736 ; 0000-0002-0774-4294 ; 0000-0002-1632-1170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27481,27903,27904,59119,59120</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler Cekic, Sebile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayhan, Isil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melekoglu, Rauf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursoy, Tugba</creatorcontrib><title>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</title><title>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine</title><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><description>This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I
2
score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario").
The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.</description><subject>amnioinfusion</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy</subject><subject>healthy survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>oligohydramnios</subject><subject>Oligohydramnios - therapy</subject><subject>perinatal mortality</subject><subject>PPROM</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><issn>1476-7058</issn><issn>1476-4954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRB7wCSAv2fTgZ3cPK6JRCEhBiaKwttx2GYzadnB1TzQfwT_jYSYsWblcOnWvqm7TvGF0xehA3zPZdz1Vw4pTLlacC6oYe9ac7vutXCv5_FjvoZPmDPEnpZxJql42J6KXdGBMnDa_L2IKOSS_YMiJbHFFcDbJmeJINMl8hwhpJj4XMv8AgmBzcmQuIQLOUMjt7d3N1w_EENzVfzRzsKTANsAjqSokwmzaKjPtMCDJnuQRoWwrlmuzWi0uAP5F7zb3-Kp54c2E8Pr4njffPl3ebz631zdXXzYX162VTMztWhlwowfLO-_H0YHrvGKSd4xRJwej7CDAOlBW9RT6UQoYqBuV5EIxqkZx3rw76D6U_Gupm-gY0MI0mQR5Qc0HIdbrTjJeUXVAbcmIBbx-qMubstOM6n0S-ikJvU9CH5Ooc2-PFssYwf2bejp9BT4egHr8XKJ5zGVyeja7KRdfTLIBtfi_xx_B3Jqp</recordid><startdate>20231215</startdate><enddate>20231215</enddate><creator>Celik, Ebru</creator><creator>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</creator><creator>Guler Cekic, Sebile</creator><creator>Unal, Ceren</creator><creator>Ayhan, Isil</creator><creator>Melekoglu, Rauf</creator><creator>Gursoy, Tugba</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-7853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-4067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-2736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0774-4294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-1170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231215</creationdate><title>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</title><author>Celik, Ebru ; Yildiz, Abdullah Burak ; Guler Cekic, Sebile ; Unal, Ceren ; Ayhan, Isil ; Melekoglu, Rauf ; Gursoy, Tugba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>amnioinfusion</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy</topic><topic>healthy survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>oligohydramnios</topic><topic>Oligohydramnios - therapy</topic><topic>perinatal mortality</topic><topic>PPROM</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler Cekic, Sebile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayhan, Isil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melekoglu, Rauf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursoy, Tugba</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celik, Ebru</au><au>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</au><au>Guler Cekic, Sebile</au><au>Unal, Ceren</au><au>Ayhan, Isil</au><au>Melekoglu, Rauf</au><au>Gursoy, Tugba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</atitle><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><date>2023-12-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2230511</spage><epage>2230511</epage><pages>2230511-2230511</pages><issn>1476-7058</issn><eissn>1476-4954</eissn><abstract>This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I
2
score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario").
The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37408113</pmid><doi>10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-7853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-4067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-2736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0774-4294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-1170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1476-7058 |
ispartof | The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2023-12, Vol.36 (2), p.2230511-2230511 |
issn | 1476-7058 1476-4954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2833996412 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access |
subjects | amnioinfusion Child Delivery, Obstetric - methods Female Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy healthy survival Humans Infant, Newborn oligohydramnios Oligohydramnios - therapy perinatal mortality PPROM Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, Second |
title | Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amnioinfusion%20vs.%20standard%20management%20for%20the%20second%20trimester%20PPROM:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20observational%20studies%20and%20RCTs&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20maternal-fetal%20&%20neonatal%20medicine&rft.au=Celik,%20Ebru&rft.date=2023-12-15&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2230511&rft.epage=2230511&rft.pages=2230511-2230511&rft.issn=1476-7058&rft.eissn=1476-4954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833996412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833996412&rft_id=info:pmid/37408113&rfr_iscdi=true |