Loading…

Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs

This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine 2023-12, Vol.36 (2), p.2230511-2230511
Main Authors: Celik, Ebru, Yildiz, Abdullah Burak, Guler Cekic, Sebile, Unal, Ceren, Ayhan, Isil, Melekoglu, Rauf, Gursoy, Tugba
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3
container_end_page 2230511
container_issue 2
container_start_page 2230511
container_title The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine
container_volume 36
creator Celik, Ebru
Yildiz, Abdullah Burak
Guler Cekic, Sebile
Unal, Ceren
Ayhan, Isil
Melekoglu, Rauf
Gursoy, Tugba
description This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I 2 score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario"). The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2833996412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2833996412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRB7wCSAv2fTgZ3cPK6JRCEhBiaKwttx2GYzadnB1TzQfwT_jYSYsWblcOnWvqm7TvGF0xehA3zPZdz1Vw4pTLlacC6oYe9ac7vutXCv5_FjvoZPmDPEnpZxJql42J6KXdGBMnDa_L2IKOSS_YMiJbHFFcDbJmeJINMl8hwhpJj4XMv8AgmBzcmQuIQLOUMjt7d3N1w_EENzVfzRzsKTANsAjqSokwmzaKjPtMCDJnuQRoWwrlmuzWi0uAP5F7zb3-Kp54c2E8Pr4njffPl3ebz631zdXXzYX162VTMztWhlwowfLO-_H0YHrvGKSd4xRJwej7CDAOlBW9RT6UQoYqBuV5EIxqkZx3rw76D6U_Gupm-gY0MI0mQR5Qc0HIdbrTjJeUXVAbcmIBbx-qMubstOM6n0S-ikJvU9CH5Ooc2-PFssYwf2bejp9BT4egHr8XKJ5zGVyeja7KRdfTLIBtfi_xx_B3Jqp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833996412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><creator>Celik, Ebru ; Yildiz, Abdullah Burak ; Guler Cekic, Sebile ; Unal, Ceren ; Ayhan, Isil ; Melekoglu, Rauf ; Gursoy, Tugba</creator><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ebru ; Yildiz, Abdullah Burak ; Guler Cekic, Sebile ; Unal, Ceren ; Ayhan, Isil ; Melekoglu, Rauf ; Gursoy, Tugba</creatorcontrib><description>This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I 2 score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario"). The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-7058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37408113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>amnioinfusion ; Child ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Female ; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy ; healthy survival ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; oligohydramnios ; Oligohydramnios - therapy ; perinatal mortality ; PPROM ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><ispartof>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine, 2023-12, Vol.36 (2), p.2230511-2230511</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3485-5843 ; 0000-0002-8160-7853 ; 0000-0002-6084-4067 ; 0000-0001-8921-2736 ; 0000-0002-0774-4294 ; 0000-0002-1632-1170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27481,27903,27904,59119,59120</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler Cekic, Sebile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayhan, Isil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melekoglu, Rauf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursoy, Tugba</creatorcontrib><title>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</title><title>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</title><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><description>This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I 2 score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario"). The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.</description><subject>amnioinfusion</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy</subject><subject>healthy survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>oligohydramnios</subject><subject>Oligohydramnios - therapy</subject><subject>perinatal mortality</subject><subject>PPROM</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><issn>1476-7058</issn><issn>1476-4954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRVsIRB7wCSAv2fTgZ3cPK6JRCEhBiaKwttx2GYzadnB1TzQfwT_jYSYsWblcOnWvqm7TvGF0xehA3zPZdz1Vw4pTLlacC6oYe9ac7vutXCv5_FjvoZPmDPEnpZxJql42J6KXdGBMnDa_L2IKOSS_YMiJbHFFcDbJmeJINMl8hwhpJj4XMv8AgmBzcmQuIQLOUMjt7d3N1w_EENzVfzRzsKTANsAjqSokwmzaKjPtMCDJnuQRoWwrlmuzWi0uAP5F7zb3-Kp54c2E8Pr4njffPl3ebz631zdXXzYX162VTMztWhlwowfLO-_H0YHrvGKSd4xRJwej7CDAOlBW9RT6UQoYqBuV5EIxqkZx3rw76D6U_Gupm-gY0MI0mQR5Qc0HIdbrTjJeUXVAbcmIBbx-qMubstOM6n0S-ikJvU9CH5Ooc2-PFssYwf2bejp9BT4egHr8XKJ5zGVyeja7KRdfTLIBtfi_xx_B3Jqp</recordid><startdate>20231215</startdate><enddate>20231215</enddate><creator>Celik, Ebru</creator><creator>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</creator><creator>Guler Cekic, Sebile</creator><creator>Unal, Ceren</creator><creator>Ayhan, Isil</creator><creator>Melekoglu, Rauf</creator><creator>Gursoy, Tugba</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-7853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-4067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-2736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0774-4294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-1170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231215</creationdate><title>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</title><author>Celik, Ebru ; Yildiz, Abdullah Burak ; Guler Cekic, Sebile ; Unal, Ceren ; Ayhan, Isil ; Melekoglu, Rauf ; Gursoy, Tugba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>amnioinfusion</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy</topic><topic>healthy survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>oligohydramnios</topic><topic>Oligohydramnios - therapy</topic><topic>perinatal mortality</topic><topic>PPROM</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler Cekic, Sebile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Ceren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayhan, Isil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melekoglu, Rauf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursoy, Tugba</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celik, Ebru</au><au>Yildiz, Abdullah Burak</au><au>Guler Cekic, Sebile</au><au>Unal, Ceren</au><au>Ayhan, Isil</au><au>Melekoglu, Rauf</au><au>Gursoy, Tugba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs</atitle><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><date>2023-12-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2230511</spage><epage>2230511</epage><pages>2230511-2230511</pages><issn>1476-7058</issn><eissn>1476-4954</eissn><abstract>This meta-analysis aims to review the effect of serial transabdominal amnioinfusion (TAI) on short-term and long-term perinatal outcomes in mid-trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Literature searches of PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were performed from their inception to April 2022. Studies comparing conventional treatment with serial TAI in women with proven PPROM at less than 26 + 0 weeks of gestation with oligohydramnios were included. Studies that included oligohydramnios due to other reasons such as fetal growth retardation or renal anomalies were excluded. Risk of bias in observational studies was assessed using the tool of the Cochrane Review group identified as risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of interventions. The risk of bias assessments for RCTs were performed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. An I 2 score was used to assess the heterogeneity of included studies. The analyses were performed by using random-effect model, and the results were expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, eight relevant studies including five observational studies (n = 252; 130 women allocated to the intervention) and three RCTs (n = 183; 93 women allocated to the intervention) were eligible. The pooled latency period was 21.9 days (95% CI, 13.1-30.8) and 5.8 days (95% CI, −11.6-23.2) longer in the TAI group in the observational studies and RCTs, respectively. The perinatal mortality rate reduced in the intervention group when tested in observational studies (RR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92), but not in RCTs (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13). The rate of long-term healthy survival was higher in the children whose mothers were treated with the TAI (35.7%) than those were treated with the standard management (28.6%) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.47-3.60, "best case scenario"). The efficacy of serial TA on early PPROM associated morbidity and mortality is not attested. Additional randomized control trials with adequate power are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>37408113</pmid><doi>10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8160-7853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-4067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-2736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0774-4294</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-1170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-7058
ispartof The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2023-12, Vol.36 (2), p.2230511-2230511
issn 1476-7058
1476-4954
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2833996412
source Taylor & Francis Open Access
subjects amnioinfusion
Child
Delivery, Obstetric - methods
Female
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture - therapy
healthy survival
Humans
Infant, Newborn
oligohydramnios
Oligohydramnios - therapy
perinatal mortality
PPROM
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
title Amnioinfusion vs. standard management for the second trimester PPROM: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amnioinfusion%20vs.%20standard%20management%20for%20the%20second%20trimester%20PPROM:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20observational%20studies%20and%20RCTs&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20maternal-fetal%20&%20neonatal%20medicine&rft.au=Celik,%20Ebru&rft.date=2023-12-15&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2230511&rft.epage=2230511&rft.pages=2230511-2230511&rft.issn=1476-7058&rft.eissn=1476-4954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14767058.2023.2230511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2833996412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-95aedbfec26ffbbded6f51426110d48a5c83ecde5c570e7b43e80db54235105b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833996412&rft_id=info:pmid/37408113&rfr_iscdi=true