Loading…

Capturing the uncertainty about a sudden change in the properties of time series with confidence curves

The representation of uncertainty in results is an important aspect of statistical techniques in hydrology and climatology. Hypothesis tests and point estimates are not well suited for this purpose. Other statistical tools, such as confidence curves, are better suited to represent uncertainty. There...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2023-02, Vol.617, p.129092, Article 129092
Main Authors: Zhou, Changrang, van Nooijen, Ronald, Kolechkina, Alla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The representation of uncertainty in results is an important aspect of statistical techniques in hydrology and climatology. Hypothesis tests and point estimates are not well suited for this purpose. Other statistical tools, such as confidence curves, are better suited to represent uncertainty. Therefore three parametric methods to construct confidence curves for the location of a sudden change in the properties of a time series, a change point (CP), are analyzed for three distributions: log-normal, gamma, and Gumbel. Two types of change are considered: a change in the mean and a change in the standard deviation. A question that confidence curves do not answer is how likely the null hypothesis of ‘no change’ is. A possible statistic to help answer this question, denoted by Un, is introduced and analyzed. It is compared to the statistic that underlies the Pettitt test. All methods perform well in terms of coverage and confidence set size. One method is based on the profile likelihood for a CP, the other two, first defined in this article, on the pseudolikelihood for a CP. The main advantage of the pseudolikelihood over the profile likelihood lies in the much lower computational cost. The confidence curves generated by the three methods are very similar. In a limited test on time series of measurements found in the literature, the methods gave results that largely matched those reported elsewhere. Some results are also given for an order one autoregressive series with a lognormal marginal distribution. •Two new methods to construct confidence curves for change points in mean/variance.•Analysis of three methods to construct confidence curves for change points.•Application of several confidence curve methods to hydrometeorological data.•A new summary for the uncertainty portrayed by a confidence curve for change points.
ISSN:0022-1694
1879-2707
DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129092