Neuroethics and cultural context: The case of electroconvulsive therapy in Argentina

• Published in: Developing world bioethics 2024-09, Vol.24 (3), p.183-191
• Main Authors: Castelli, Paula, Guinjoan, Salvador M., Wajnerman‐Paz, Abel, Salles, Arleen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Argentina; Bans; bioethical principles; Concept formation; context; Cultural factors; Culture; Electroconvulsive therapy; Electroconvulsive Therapy - ethics; electroconvulsvive therapy; Ethical dilemmas; Ethics; Humans; informed consent; Local conditions; Local knowledge; Medical ethics; Medical treatment; Nervous system; neuroethics; Neurosciences - ethics; Professional practice; Prohibition
• ISSN: 1471-8731; 1471-8847; 1471-8847
• DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12412

As neuroethics continues to grow as an established discipline, it has been charged with not being sufficiently sensitive to the way in which the identification, conceptualization, and management of the ethical issues raised by neuroscience and its applications are shaped by local systems of knowledge and structures. Recently there have been calls for explicit recognition of the role played by local cultural contexts and for the development of cross‐cultural methodologies that can facilitate meaningful cultural engagement. In this article, we attempt to fill this perceived gap by providing a culturally situated analysis of the practice of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in Argentina. ECT was introduced as a psychiatric treatment in Argentina in the 1930s but it is largely underutilized. While the use of ECT remains low in several countries, what makes the Argentinian case interesting is that the executive branch of government has taken a stance regarding both the scientific and moral appropriateness of ECT, recommending its prohibition. Here, we begin with a recent controversy over the use of ECT in Argentina and explain the legal recommendation to ban its application. Next, we offer an overview of some of the salient aspect of the international and local discussions on ECT. We argue that the governmental recommendation to ban the procedure should be rethought. While acknowledging the role that contexts and local conditions play in shaping the identification and assessment of the relevant ethical issues, we caution against using contextual and cultural considerations to avoid a necessary ethical debate on controversial issues.