Automatic threat processing shows evidence of exclusivity

De Neys argues against assigning exclusive capacities to automatic versus controlled processes. The dual implicit process model provides a theoretical rationale for the exclusivity of automatic threat processing, and corresponding data provide empirical evidence of such exclusivity. De Neys's d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Behavioral and brain sciences 2023-07, Vol.46, p.e131-e131, Article e131
Main Authors: March, David S., Olson, Michael A., Gaertner, Lowell
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Open Peer Commentary
Threats
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:De Neys argues against assigning exclusive capacities to automatic versus controlled processes. The dual implicit process model provides a theoretical rationale for the exclusivity of automatic threat processing, and corresponding data provide empirical evidence of such exclusivity. De Neys's dismissal of exclusivity is premature and based on a limited sampling of psychological research.
ISSN:0140-525X
1469-1825
DOI:10.1017/S0140525X22002928