Loading…

Prisoner's dilemma and the free operant: John Nash, I'd like you to meet Fred Skinner

In separate chambers, responding by two pairs of pigeons was reinforced under concurrent random-ratio schedules of reinforcement. For each pair, the birds' schedules were coupled in such a manner that left- and right-key reinforcement probabilities were determined by the key being pecked by the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2023-11, Vol.120 (3), p.320-329
Main Author: Keller, John V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-82b21ed0756cfa3710ca72a2d0cf82b8a5197f1715a6bb9642d8c902bdf977bd3
container_end_page 329
container_issue 3
container_start_page 320
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 120
creator Keller, John V
description In separate chambers, responding by two pairs of pigeons was reinforced under concurrent random-ratio schedules of reinforcement. For each pair, the birds' schedules were coupled in such a manner that left- and right-key reinforcement probabilities were determined by the key being pecked by the other pigeon of the pair. In this way, a reinforcement matrix, like that of the popular Prisoner's Dilemma game of game theory, was created. The responding of all subjects soon gravitated to the choice combination identified by the mathematician John Nash as the equilibrium of the Prisoner's Dilemma game. This was found both before and after reversal of contingencies on the keys. In a second experiment, with a single pair of pigeons, stimuli signaling the choice of the paired pigeon had little lasting effect: responding again gravitated to the game's equilibrium. The results affirm earlier findings, demonstrating that Skinner's principle of positive reinforcement, together with Nashian mathematics, entirely accounts for iterative game-theoretic behavior. They extend these findings to the so-called free operant: to schedules of reinforcement in which responding is not constrained by stimulus-response sequencing (i.e., a trials procedure). The coupled schedule of reinforcement introduced here offers significant promise for the experimental analysis of economic and social behaviors.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jeab.874
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839741013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2839741013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-82b21ed0756cfa3710ca72a2d0cf82b8a5197f1715a6bb9642d8c902bdf977bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0AWPNSDqfuRZDfepFitFBW057CbndC0SbbuJof-e7dYPXiZGXgfHoYXoUtKJpQQdrcGpSdSxEdoSDMuIy4oPUbDELEoCXOAzrxfhyNLBTtFAy7iNE4SNkTLd1d524Ibe2yqGppGYdUa3K0Alw4A2y041Xb3-MWuWvyq_OoWz8cG19UG8M72uLO4AejwzIHBH5uqDbJzdFKq2sPFYY_Qcvb4OX2OFm9P8-nDIiqYYF0kmWYUDBFJWpQqPE0KJZhihhRlyKRKaCZKKmiiUq2zNGZGFhlh2pSZENrwEbr58W6d_erBd3lT-QLqWrVge58zyTMRU0J5QK__oWvbuzZ8FyiZcMnSgP0JC2e9d1DmW1c1yu1ySvJ91fm-6jxUHdCrg7DXDZg_8Ldb_g3l8Xb2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2885382601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prisoner's dilemma and the free operant: John Nash, I'd like you to meet Fred Skinner</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Keller, John V</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, John V</creatorcontrib><description>In separate chambers, responding by two pairs of pigeons was reinforced under concurrent random-ratio schedules of reinforcement. For each pair, the birds' schedules were coupled in such a manner that left- and right-key reinforcement probabilities were determined by the key being pecked by the other pigeon of the pair. In this way, a reinforcement matrix, like that of the popular Prisoner's Dilemma game of game theory, was created. The responding of all subjects soon gravitated to the choice combination identified by the mathematician John Nash as the equilibrium of the Prisoner's Dilemma game. This was found both before and after reversal of contingencies on the keys. In a second experiment, with a single pair of pigeons, stimuli signaling the choice of the paired pigeon had little lasting effect: responding again gravitated to the game's equilibrium. The results affirm earlier findings, demonstrating that Skinner's principle of positive reinforcement, together with Nashian mathematics, entirely accounts for iterative game-theoretic behavior. They extend these findings to the so-called free operant: to schedules of reinforcement in which responding is not constrained by stimulus-response sequencing (i.e., a trials procedure). The coupled schedule of reinforcement introduced here offers significant promise for the experimental analysis of economic and social behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.874</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37464552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Columbidae ; Cooperative Behavior ; Game Theory ; Humans ; Institutionalized Persons ; Operant conditioning ; Positive Reinforcement ; Prisoner Dilemma ; Prisoner's dilemma ; Reinforcement ; Reinforcement schedules ; Reinforcement, Psychology ; Social Behavior</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2023-11, Vol.120 (3), p.320-329</ispartof><rights>2023 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2023 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-82b21ed0756cfa3710ca72a2d0cf82b8a5197f1715a6bb9642d8c902bdf977bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, John V</creatorcontrib><title>Prisoner's dilemma and the free operant: John Nash, I'd like you to meet Fred Skinner</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>In separate chambers, responding by two pairs of pigeons was reinforced under concurrent random-ratio schedules of reinforcement. For each pair, the birds' schedules were coupled in such a manner that left- and right-key reinforcement probabilities were determined by the key being pecked by the other pigeon of the pair. In this way, a reinforcement matrix, like that of the popular Prisoner's Dilemma game of game theory, was created. The responding of all subjects soon gravitated to the choice combination identified by the mathematician John Nash as the equilibrium of the Prisoner's Dilemma game. This was found both before and after reversal of contingencies on the keys. In a second experiment, with a single pair of pigeons, stimuli signaling the choice of the paired pigeon had little lasting effect: responding again gravitated to the game's equilibrium. The results affirm earlier findings, demonstrating that Skinner's principle of positive reinforcement, together with Nashian mathematics, entirely accounts for iterative game-theoretic behavior. They extend these findings to the so-called free operant: to schedules of reinforcement in which responding is not constrained by stimulus-response sequencing (i.e., a trials procedure). The coupled schedule of reinforcement introduced here offers significant promise for the experimental analysis of economic and social behaviors.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutionalized Persons</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Prisoner Dilemma</subject><subject>Prisoner's dilemma</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement schedules</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Psychology</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0AWPNSDqfuRZDfepFitFBW057CbndC0SbbuJof-e7dYPXiZGXgfHoYXoUtKJpQQdrcGpSdSxEdoSDMuIy4oPUbDELEoCXOAzrxfhyNLBTtFAy7iNE4SNkTLd1d524Ibe2yqGppGYdUa3K0Alw4A2y041Xb3-MWuWvyq_OoWz8cG19UG8M72uLO4AejwzIHBH5uqDbJzdFKq2sPFYY_Qcvb4OX2OFm9P8-nDIiqYYF0kmWYUDBFJWpQqPE0KJZhihhRlyKRKaCZKKmiiUq2zNGZGFhlh2pSZENrwEbr58W6d_erBd3lT-QLqWrVge58zyTMRU0J5QK__oWvbuzZ8FyiZcMnSgP0JC2e9d1DmW1c1yu1ySvJ91fm-6jxUHdCrg7DXDZg_8Ldb_g3l8Xb2</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Keller, John V</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Prisoner's dilemma and the free operant: John Nash, I'd like you to meet Fred Skinner</title><author>Keller, John V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-82b21ed0756cfa3710ca72a2d0cf82b8a5197f1715a6bb9642d8c902bdf977bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutionalized Persons</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Prisoner Dilemma</topic><topic>Prisoner's dilemma</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement schedules</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Psychology</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, John V</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, John V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prisoner's dilemma and the free operant: John Nash, I'd like you to meet Fred Skinner</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>320-329</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>In separate chambers, responding by two pairs of pigeons was reinforced under concurrent random-ratio schedules of reinforcement. For each pair, the birds' schedules were coupled in such a manner that left- and right-key reinforcement probabilities were determined by the key being pecked by the other pigeon of the pair. In this way, a reinforcement matrix, like that of the popular Prisoner's Dilemma game of game theory, was created. The responding of all subjects soon gravitated to the choice combination identified by the mathematician John Nash as the equilibrium of the Prisoner's Dilemma game. This was found both before and after reversal of contingencies on the keys. In a second experiment, with a single pair of pigeons, stimuli signaling the choice of the paired pigeon had little lasting effect: responding again gravitated to the game's equilibrium. The results affirm earlier findings, demonstrating that Skinner's principle of positive reinforcement, together with Nashian mathematics, entirely accounts for iterative game-theoretic behavior. They extend these findings to the so-called free operant: to schedules of reinforcement in which responding is not constrained by stimulus-response sequencing (i.e., a trials procedure). The coupled schedule of reinforcement introduced here offers significant promise for the experimental analysis of economic and social behaviors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37464552</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.874</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2023-11, Vol.120 (3), p.320-329
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2839741013
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Columbidae
Cooperative Behavior
Game Theory
Humans
Institutionalized Persons
Operant conditioning
Positive Reinforcement
Prisoner Dilemma
Prisoner's dilemma
Reinforcement
Reinforcement schedules
Reinforcement, Psychology
Social Behavior
title Prisoner's dilemma and the free operant: John Nash, I'd like you to meet Fred Skinner
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A18%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prisoner's%20dilemma%20and%20the%20free%20operant:%20John%20Nash,%20I'd%20like%20you%20to%20meet%20Fred%20Skinner&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Keller,%20John%20V&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=320-329&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.874&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2839741013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-82b21ed0756cfa3710ca72a2d0cf82b8a5197f1715a6bb9642d8c902bdf977bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2885382601&rft_id=info:pmid/37464552&rfr_iscdi=true