Loading…

Public perceptions of abortion complications

Misinformation contributes to the perception that abortion has substantial health risks, despite the known safety of medication and aspiration abortion. We lack detailed information about which health risks the public believes are most likely. This study aimed to describe public perception of short-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2023-10, Vol.229 (4), p.421.e1-421.e8
Main Authors: Chaiken, Sarina R., Darney, Blair G., Schenck, Marta, Han, Leo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3
container_end_page 421.e8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 421.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 229
creator Chaiken, Sarina R.
Darney, Blair G.
Schenck, Marta
Han, Leo
description Misinformation contributes to the perception that abortion has substantial health risks, despite the known safety of medication and aspiration abortion. We lack detailed information about which health risks the public believes are most likely. This study aimed to describe public perception of short- and long-term risks of abortion. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of US residents aged ≥18 years using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). We collected information regarding participant demographics, reproductive history, political views, and position on abortion restrictions. We provided participants with a list of 9 short-term and 15 long-term possible complications and asked them to indicate whether they occurred never (0%), very rarely (20%) following abortion. We used descriptive statistics to understand our population demographics and to capture the perceived incidence of all complications. We created a binary indicator of answering all risk estimates incorrectly vs at least 1 estimate correctly, separately for all long-term possible complications, and the 2 short-term risks of infection and bleeding. We determined the proportion of individuals who responded incorrectly to all questions in each category and used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with incorrect perceptions about the risks of abortion. For all listed complications, participant (N=1057) estimates of risk were higher than the known incidence. For both short-term risks of bleeding and infection, over 40% of participants reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently. Similarly, for both long-term risks of depression and anxiety, over 60% of respondents reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently after abortion. Participants reported that possible complications known to not be associated with abortion, including hair loss, future pregnancy complications, breast cancer, and cosmetic disfigurement, occurred at least rarely. Nearly one-quarter of participants responded that death occurs occasionally or frequently (in over 5% of abortions), and 79% of participants responded that breast cancer can result from abortion. One-quarter (24.9%) of participants incorrectly overestimated both short-term outcomes of infection and bleeding, whereas 19.5% answered all long-term complication questions incorrectly, including outcomes that never occur. On multivariable analyses, we identif
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2840249099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937823004726</els_id><sourcerecordid>2840249099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo7rr6BTzIHj3Y-pqmTQJeZPEfLOhBzyFN3kpKu6lJK_jtbd3Vo6fH8H4zMEPIeQZpBll5Xae69u8pBZqnwFOg7IDMM5A8KUUpDskcAGgicy5m5CTGepJU0mMyyzkrucjlnFy9DFXjzLLDYLDrnd_Gpd8sdeXDJJbGt9341z-fU3K00U3Es_1dkLf7u9fVY7J-fnha3a4TkxdlnxSFRMMrwRmWZWat4LwoGJOZ5QKQasqEkBKoYbkpgIG2QmtGLZVCGyowX5DLXW4X_MeAsVetiwabRm_RD1FRwcayEqQcUbpDTfAxBtyoLrhWhy-VgZpWUrWaVlLTSgq4Go2j6WKfP1Qt2j_L7ywjcLMDcGz56TCoaBxuDVoX0PTKevdf_jeLAXb5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2840249099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public perceptions of abortion complications</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chaiken, Sarina R. ; Darney, Blair G. ; Schenck, Marta ; Han, Leo</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaiken, Sarina R. ; Darney, Blair G. ; Schenck, Marta ; Han, Leo</creatorcontrib><description>Misinformation contributes to the perception that abortion has substantial health risks, despite the known safety of medication and aspiration abortion. We lack detailed information about which health risks the public believes are most likely. This study aimed to describe public perception of short- and long-term risks of abortion. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of US residents aged ≥18 years using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). We collected information regarding participant demographics, reproductive history, political views, and position on abortion restrictions. We provided participants with a list of 9 short-term and 15 long-term possible complications and asked them to indicate whether they occurred never (0%), very rarely (&lt;1%), rarely (1%–5%), occasionally (5%–20%), or frequently (&gt;20%) following abortion. We used descriptive statistics to understand our population demographics and to capture the perceived incidence of all complications. We created a binary indicator of answering all risk estimates incorrectly vs at least 1 estimate correctly, separately for all long-term possible complications, and the 2 short-term risks of infection and bleeding. We determined the proportion of individuals who responded incorrectly to all questions in each category and used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with incorrect perceptions about the risks of abortion. For all listed complications, participant (N=1057) estimates of risk were higher than the known incidence. For both short-term risks of bleeding and infection, over 40% of participants reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently. Similarly, for both long-term risks of depression and anxiety, over 60% of respondents reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently after abortion. Participants reported that possible complications known to not be associated with abortion, including hair loss, future pregnancy complications, breast cancer, and cosmetic disfigurement, occurred at least rarely. Nearly one-quarter of participants responded that death occurs occasionally or frequently (in over 5% of abortions), and 79% of participants responded that breast cancer can result from abortion. One-quarter (24.9%) of participants incorrectly overestimated both short-term outcomes of infection and bleeding, whereas 19.5% answered all long-term complication questions incorrectly, including outcomes that never occur. On multivariable analyses, we identified that the participants most likely to incorrectly identify risks of abortion identified as Asian or Black race/ethnicity, were from rural communities, or believed that abortion should have more legal restrictions. The public perceives abortion to be much riskier than it actually is. This information can be used to develop targeted clinical and public health efforts to disseminate the true risks of abortion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37467839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>abortion ; complications ; public perception ; risk</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023-10, Vol.229 (4), p.421.e1-421.e8</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5363-6115</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37467839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaiken, Sarina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darney, Blair G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenck, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Leo</creatorcontrib><title>Public perceptions of abortion complications</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Misinformation contributes to the perception that abortion has substantial health risks, despite the known safety of medication and aspiration abortion. We lack detailed information about which health risks the public believes are most likely. This study aimed to describe public perception of short- and long-term risks of abortion. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of US residents aged ≥18 years using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). We collected information regarding participant demographics, reproductive history, political views, and position on abortion restrictions. We provided participants with a list of 9 short-term and 15 long-term possible complications and asked them to indicate whether they occurred never (0%), very rarely (&lt;1%), rarely (1%–5%), occasionally (5%–20%), or frequently (&gt;20%) following abortion. We used descriptive statistics to understand our population demographics and to capture the perceived incidence of all complications. We created a binary indicator of answering all risk estimates incorrectly vs at least 1 estimate correctly, separately for all long-term possible complications, and the 2 short-term risks of infection and bleeding. We determined the proportion of individuals who responded incorrectly to all questions in each category and used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with incorrect perceptions about the risks of abortion. For all listed complications, participant (N=1057) estimates of risk were higher than the known incidence. For both short-term risks of bleeding and infection, over 40% of participants reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently. Similarly, for both long-term risks of depression and anxiety, over 60% of respondents reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently after abortion. Participants reported that possible complications known to not be associated with abortion, including hair loss, future pregnancy complications, breast cancer, and cosmetic disfigurement, occurred at least rarely. Nearly one-quarter of participants responded that death occurs occasionally or frequently (in over 5% of abortions), and 79% of participants responded that breast cancer can result from abortion. One-quarter (24.9%) of participants incorrectly overestimated both short-term outcomes of infection and bleeding, whereas 19.5% answered all long-term complication questions incorrectly, including outcomes that never occur. On multivariable analyses, we identified that the participants most likely to incorrectly identify risks of abortion identified as Asian or Black race/ethnicity, were from rural communities, or believed that abortion should have more legal restrictions. The public perceives abortion to be much riskier than it actually is. This information can be used to develop targeted clinical and public health efforts to disseminate the true risks of abortion.</description><subject>abortion</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>public perception</subject><subject>risk</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo7rr6BTzIHj3Y-pqmTQJeZPEfLOhBzyFN3kpKu6lJK_jtbd3Vo6fH8H4zMEPIeQZpBll5Xae69u8pBZqnwFOg7IDMM5A8KUUpDskcAGgicy5m5CTGepJU0mMyyzkrucjlnFy9DFXjzLLDYLDrnd_Gpd8sdeXDJJbGt9341z-fU3K00U3Es_1dkLf7u9fVY7J-fnha3a4TkxdlnxSFRMMrwRmWZWat4LwoGJOZ5QKQasqEkBKoYbkpgIG2QmtGLZVCGyowX5DLXW4X_MeAsVetiwabRm_RD1FRwcayEqQcUbpDTfAxBtyoLrhWhy-VgZpWUrWaVlLTSgq4Go2j6WKfP1Qt2j_L7ywjcLMDcGz56TCoaBxuDVoX0PTKevdf_jeLAXb5</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Chaiken, Sarina R.</creator><creator>Darney, Blair G.</creator><creator>Schenck, Marta</creator><creator>Han, Leo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5363-6115</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Public perceptions of abortion complications</title><author>Chaiken, Sarina R. ; Darney, Blair G. ; Schenck, Marta ; Han, Leo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>abortion</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>public perception</topic><topic>risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaiken, Sarina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darney, Blair G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenck, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Leo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaiken, Sarina R.</au><au>Darney, Blair G.</au><au>Schenck, Marta</au><au>Han, Leo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public perceptions of abortion complications</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>229</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421.e1</spage><epage>421.e8</epage><pages>421.e1-421.e8</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Misinformation contributes to the perception that abortion has substantial health risks, despite the known safety of medication and aspiration abortion. We lack detailed information about which health risks the public believes are most likely. This study aimed to describe public perception of short- and long-term risks of abortion. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of US residents aged ≥18 years using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). We collected information regarding participant demographics, reproductive history, political views, and position on abortion restrictions. We provided participants with a list of 9 short-term and 15 long-term possible complications and asked them to indicate whether they occurred never (0%), very rarely (&lt;1%), rarely (1%–5%), occasionally (5%–20%), or frequently (&gt;20%) following abortion. We used descriptive statistics to understand our population demographics and to capture the perceived incidence of all complications. We created a binary indicator of answering all risk estimates incorrectly vs at least 1 estimate correctly, separately for all long-term possible complications, and the 2 short-term risks of infection and bleeding. We determined the proportion of individuals who responded incorrectly to all questions in each category and used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with incorrect perceptions about the risks of abortion. For all listed complications, participant (N=1057) estimates of risk were higher than the known incidence. For both short-term risks of bleeding and infection, over 40% of participants reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently. Similarly, for both long-term risks of depression and anxiety, over 60% of respondents reported that these outcomes occur occasionally or frequently after abortion. Participants reported that possible complications known to not be associated with abortion, including hair loss, future pregnancy complications, breast cancer, and cosmetic disfigurement, occurred at least rarely. Nearly one-quarter of participants responded that death occurs occasionally or frequently (in over 5% of abortions), and 79% of participants responded that breast cancer can result from abortion. One-quarter (24.9%) of participants incorrectly overestimated both short-term outcomes of infection and bleeding, whereas 19.5% answered all long-term complication questions incorrectly, including outcomes that never occur. On multivariable analyses, we identified that the participants most likely to incorrectly identify risks of abortion identified as Asian or Black race/ethnicity, were from rural communities, or believed that abortion should have more legal restrictions. The public perceives abortion to be much riskier than it actually is. This information can be used to develop targeted clinical and public health efforts to disseminate the true risks of abortion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37467839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.024</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5363-6115</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023-10, Vol.229 (4), p.421.e1-421.e8
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2840249099
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects abortion
complications
public perception
risk
title Public perceptions of abortion complications
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20perceptions%20of%20abortion%20complications&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Chaiken,%20Sarina%20R.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=229&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421.e1&rft.epage=421.e8&rft.pages=421.e1-421.e8&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2840249099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-559ec7b874e661dd877554491d780e2a24889902c43c5040ad8aa42d298ac28e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2840249099&rft_id=info:pmid/37467839&rfr_iscdi=true