Loading…

Functional and anatomical outcomes of fovea on, fovea off and fovea-splitting rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Purpose To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of fovea-on, fovea-off, and fovea-split rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods Retrospective case series of consecutive patients diagnosed with RRD and treated with only pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Preoperative and postoperative op...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2023-11, Vol.261 (11), p.3187-3192
Main Authors: Barequet, Dana, Shemesh, Rachel, Zvi, Dana, Cohen, Ram, Trivizki, Omer, Schwartz, Shulamit, Barak, Adiel, Loewenstein, Anat, Rabina, Gilad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of fovea-on, fovea-off, and fovea-split rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods Retrospective case series of consecutive patients diagnosed with RRD and treated with only pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Preoperative and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and functional outcomes were obtained prior to and 6 months after surgery. RRD extending to the edge of the fovea on OCT was termed fovea-split RRD. Results A total of 152 eyes were included, out of which 89 eyes presented with a fovea-off, 36 with a fovea-on, and 27 with a fovea-split RRD. The mean visual acuity (VA) preoperatively was 1.32 ± 0.58 logMAR (20/400 equivalent on Snellen chart), 0.19 ± 0.20 (20/30), and 0.71 ± 0.56 (20/100) for the fovea-off, fovea-on, and fovea-split groups, respectively ( p < 0.001). The mean VA at 6 months of follow-up significantly improved for the fovea-split and fovea-off groups to 0.54 ± 0.79 (20/70) ( p < 0.001) and 0.45 ± 0.29 (20/50) ( p = 0.01), respectively, and remained stable for the fovea-on group 0.24 ± 0.20 (20/30) ( p = 0.25). Differences in alterations of the outer retinal layers ( p < 0.001) and in the in-segment/outer-segment ratio ( p < 0.001) were found between the groups. Conclusion Eyes with fovea-split RRD had both a preoperative and a final postoperative VA between those of fovea-on and fovea-off eyes and different anatomical changes on OCT. This new entity warrants different patient expectations for postoperative outcomes.
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-023-06169-z