Loading…

Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World neurosurgery 2023-10, Vol.178, p.93-95
Main Authors: Brasil, Sérgio, Godoy, Daniel A., Paiva, Wellingson S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43
container_end_page 95
container_issue
container_start_page 93
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 178
creator Brasil, Sérgio
Godoy, Daniel A.
Paiva, Wellingson S.
description Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making. Brief literature review. For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs. The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841404767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875023009944</els_id><sourcerecordid>2841404767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonR2Kb2BVyYWbrpCFwGmMSNqX9N2uhC12QGGKVphwozNr69NK1dyuaSm_N9gYPQJcE5wYTfLPNta_ucYgo5FjkuihM0JFLIiRS8PD3eCzxA4xiXOB0gTAo4RwMQTFIsyyGS9961H9nCB5ttXfeZzW2MmW-zWduFSoeqddUqew1p2ydk4VvX-ZAiF-isqVbRjg9zhN4fH96mz5P5y9NsejefaCh4NykYBSg5bjiAYQ2U6QEGDKcMGm14DZQQ2oCphSHQMGoqwnktaw6WVkQzGKHrfe8m-K_exk6tXdR2tapa6_uoqGSEYSa4SCjdozr4GINt1Ca4dRV-FMFqJ00t1U6a2klTWKgkLYWuDv19vbbmGPlTlIDbPWDTL7-dDSpqZ1ttjQtWd8p491__L-91fAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841404767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Brasil, Sérgio ; Godoy, Daniel A. ; Paiva, Wellingson S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sérgio ; Godoy, Daniel A. ; Paiva, Wellingson S.</creatorcontrib><description>Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making. Brief literature review. For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs. The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37482089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute brain injury ; Brain ; Brain Injuries ; Cerebrovascular Circulation ; Humans ; Intracranial compliance ; Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis ; Intracranial pressure ; Intracranial Pressure - physiology ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Multimodal monitoring</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2023-10, Vol.178, p.93-95</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2397-9947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37482089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Wellingson S.</creatorcontrib><title>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making. Brief literature review. For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs. The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.</description><subject>Acute brain injury</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Injuries</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Circulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial compliance</subject><subject>Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intracranial pressure</subject><subject>Intracranial Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Multimodal monitoring</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonR2Kb2BVyYWbrpCFwGmMSNqX9N2uhC12QGGKVphwozNr69NK1dyuaSm_N9gYPQJcE5wYTfLPNta_ucYgo5FjkuihM0JFLIiRS8PD3eCzxA4xiXOB0gTAo4RwMQTFIsyyGS9961H9nCB5ttXfeZzW2MmW-zWduFSoeqddUqew1p2ydk4VvX-ZAiF-isqVbRjg9zhN4fH96mz5P5y9NsejefaCh4NykYBSg5bjiAYQ2U6QEGDKcMGm14DZQQ2oCphSHQMGoqwnktaw6WVkQzGKHrfe8m-K_exk6tXdR2tapa6_uoqGSEYSa4SCjdozr4GINt1Ca4dRV-FMFqJ00t1U6a2klTWKgkLYWuDv19vbbmGPlTlIDbPWDTL7-dDSpqZ1ttjQtWd8p491__L-91fAM</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Brasil, Sérgio</creator><creator>Godoy, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Paiva, Wellingson S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-9947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</title><author>Brasil, Sérgio ; Godoy, Daniel A. ; Paiva, Wellingson S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acute brain injury</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Injuries</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Circulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial compliance</topic><topic>Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intracranial pressure</topic><topic>Intracranial Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Multimodal monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Wellingson S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brasil, Sérgio</au><au>Godoy, Daniel A.</au><au>Paiva, Wellingson S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>178</volume><spage>93</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>93-95</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making. Brief literature review. For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs. The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37482089</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-9947</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2023-10, Vol.178, p.93-95
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841404767
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Acute brain injury
Brain
Brain Injuries
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Humans
Intracranial compliance
Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis
Intracranial pressure
Intracranial Pressure - physiology
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Multimodal monitoring
title Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A33%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doing%20More%20with%20Less%20on%20Intracranial%20Pressure%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Brasil,%20S%C3%A9rgio&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=178&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=93-95&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841404767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841404767&rft_id=info:pmid/37482089&rfr_iscdi=true