Loading…
Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one s...
Saved in:
Published in: | World neurosurgery 2023-10, Vol.178, p.93-95 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43 |
container_end_page | 95 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 178 |
creator | Brasil, Sérgio Godoy, Daniel A. Paiva, Wellingson S. |
description | Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making.
Brief literature review.
For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs.
The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841404767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875023009944</els_id><sourcerecordid>2841404767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonR2Kb2BVyYWbrpCFwGmMSNqX9N2uhC12QGGKVphwozNr69NK1dyuaSm_N9gYPQJcE5wYTfLPNta_ucYgo5FjkuihM0JFLIiRS8PD3eCzxA4xiXOB0gTAo4RwMQTFIsyyGS9961H9nCB5ttXfeZzW2MmW-zWduFSoeqddUqew1p2ydk4VvX-ZAiF-isqVbRjg9zhN4fH96mz5P5y9NsejefaCh4NykYBSg5bjiAYQ2U6QEGDKcMGm14DZQQ2oCphSHQMGoqwnktaw6WVkQzGKHrfe8m-K_exk6tXdR2tapa6_uoqGSEYSa4SCjdozr4GINt1Ca4dRV-FMFqJ00t1U6a2klTWKgkLYWuDv19vbbmGPlTlIDbPWDTL7-dDSpqZ1ttjQtWd8p491__L-91fAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841404767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Brasil, Sérgio ; Godoy, Daniel A. ; Paiva, Wellingson S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sérgio ; Godoy, Daniel A. ; Paiva, Wellingson S.</creatorcontrib><description>Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making.
Brief literature review.
For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs.
The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37482089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute brain injury ; Brain ; Brain Injuries ; Cerebrovascular Circulation ; Humans ; Intracranial compliance ; Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis ; Intracranial pressure ; Intracranial Pressure - physiology ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Multimodal monitoring</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2023-10, Vol.178, p.93-95</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2397-9947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37482089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Wellingson S.</creatorcontrib><title>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making.
Brief literature review.
For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs.
The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.</description><subject>Acute brain injury</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Injuries</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Circulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial compliance</subject><subject>Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intracranial pressure</subject><subject>Intracranial Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Multimodal monitoring</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonR2Kb2BVyYWbrpCFwGmMSNqX9N2uhC12QGGKVphwozNr69NK1dyuaSm_N9gYPQJcE5wYTfLPNta_ucYgo5FjkuihM0JFLIiRS8PD3eCzxA4xiXOB0gTAo4RwMQTFIsyyGS9961H9nCB5ttXfeZzW2MmW-zWduFSoeqddUqew1p2ydk4VvX-ZAiF-isqVbRjg9zhN4fH96mz5P5y9NsejefaCh4NykYBSg5bjiAYQ2U6QEGDKcMGm14DZQQ2oCphSHQMGoqwnktaw6WVkQzGKHrfe8m-K_exk6tXdR2tapa6_uoqGSEYSa4SCjdozr4GINt1Ca4dRV-FMFqJ00t1U6a2klTWKgkLYWuDv19vbbmGPlTlIDbPWDTL7-dDSpqZ1ttjQtWd8p491__L-91fAM</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Brasil, Sérgio</creator><creator>Godoy, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Paiva, Wellingson S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-9947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</title><author>Brasil, Sérgio ; Godoy, Daniel A. ; Paiva, Wellingson S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acute brain injury</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Injuries</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Circulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial compliance</topic><topic>Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intracranial pressure</topic><topic>Intracranial Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Multimodal monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godoy, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paiva, Wellingson S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brasil, Sérgio</au><au>Godoy, Daniel A.</au><au>Paiva, Wellingson S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>178</volume><spage>93</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>93-95</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Intracranial pressure (ICP) management based on predetermined thresholds is not accurate in light of recent research on cerebrovascular physiology. Interpersonal and intrapersonal variations will lead ICP elevations to reach individualized thresholds for intracranial compliance impairment from one subject to another. Therefore reuniting the modern techniques of neuromonitoring besides ICP enables practitioners to have a more whole picture in anticipating neuro worsening and improving timing in decision making.
Brief literature review.
For the severely brain-injured patient, current evidence indicates a personalized and physiology-based multimodal monitoring care to be required rather than decision making according to ICP predetermined cut-offs.
The authors’ point of view is of particular importance for regions with resource heterogeneity and scarcity, where ICP monitoring is not available for all those in need and noninvasive techniques may provide a surrogate approach. If physicians who deal with acute-brain-injured patients in lower-resource areas understand that several tools besides ICP may improve their practice, it is possible to reduce acute brain injury morbimortality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37482089</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-9947</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2023-10, Vol.178, p.93-95 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2841404767 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Acute brain injury Brain Brain Injuries Cerebrovascular Circulation Humans Intracranial compliance Intracranial Hypertension - diagnosis Intracranial pressure Intracranial Pressure - physiology Monitoring, Physiologic - methods Multimodal monitoring |
title | Doing More with Less on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A33%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doing%20More%20with%20Less%20on%20Intracranial%20Pressure%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Brasil,%20S%C3%A9rgio&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=178&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=93-95&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2841404767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-54233960f633d4f39873d3d6243fcd6b32112f3db7d13f42da166b8b63e2a1c43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841404767&rft_id=info:pmid/37482089&rfr_iscdi=true |