Loading…

Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice

This study aimed to review clinical practice outcomes of early pregnancy loss (EPL) medical management using mifepristone and misoprostol outside of a clinical trial setting. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed a deidentified database of patients who received mifepristone-misoprostol for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contraception (Stoneham) 2023-10, Vol.126, p.110134-110134, Article 110134
Main Authors: Baker, Courtney C., Wu, Brenda T., Han, Gloria, Flynn, Anne N., Creinin, Mitchell D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493
container_end_page 110134
container_issue
container_start_page 110134
container_title Contraception (Stoneham)
container_volume 126
creator Baker, Courtney C.
Wu, Brenda T.
Han, Gloria
Flynn, Anne N.
Creinin, Mitchell D.
description This study aimed to review clinical practice outcomes of early pregnancy loss (EPL) medical management using mifepristone and misoprostol outside of a clinical trial setting. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed a deidentified database of patients who received mifepristone-misoprostol for EPL from May 2018 to May 2021 at our academic center–based clinic, which was a study site for a multicenter mifepristone-misoprostol EPL trial completed in March 2018. All patients received mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally or buccally, with clinic follow-up typically scheduled within 1 week. The primary outcome was successful medical management, defined as management without the need for aspiration, and the secondary outcomes included additional interventions and indications, follow-up ultrasonography findings, and adverse events requiring treatment. We treated 90 patients with a median ultrasound-measured gestational size of 49 (range 30–80) days and median time from mifepristone to misoprostol of 24 (range 8–66) hours. Follow-up was completed in clinic by 80 (88.9%), completed remotely by five (5.6%), and not completed by five (5.6%) patients. Overall, 76 (95% CI 82.9%–96.0%) of 85 patients (89.4%) with follow-up were successfully managed without uterine aspiration. Eighty patients had initial follow-up ultrasonography interpreted as gestational sac expulsion; seven (8.8%) of these ultimately underwent aspiration, including one patient who had a previously undiagnosed cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Two patients had significant safety outcomes: one pelvic infection and one blood transfusion during aspiration in the patient with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Outside of a clinical trial setting, medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol remains effective and safe. Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is effective and safe outside of a clinical trial setting. A standardized protocol based on the best available clinical trial evidence can be used in clinical practice for the medical management of EPL.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844680512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010782423002287</els_id><sourcerecordid>2844680512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6FaTgxUtrkqZNi15kWf_Aghc9h3Q6XbK0aU26wn57s1YFb54GZt6bx_sRcsVowijLb7YJ9HZ0GnAYTW8TTnmasHBKxRGZs0KWMc1YcUzmlDIay4KLGTnzfksplWUmT8kslRkXTMg5uVtp1-6jweHGagv7qO29jzqsDeg26rTVG-zQjpGxEbTGfq2HED4awHNy0ujW48X3XJC3h9Xr8ilevzw-L-_XMYg0H-Na6lxg3UhZ5ZzWupKphKLCvMlKKirNecZ0AwIYrRotkVU8l1xzVtZZWYoyXZDr6e_g-vcd-lF1xgO2rbbY77zihRB5EUrzIL2dpOBCEYeNGpzptNsrRtUBn9qqP_jUAZ-a8AX35XfQrgoMfr0_vIJgNQkw1P0w6JQHgxYCL4cwqro3_wr6BJ4aiNc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844680512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Baker, Courtney C. ; Wu, Brenda T. ; Han, Gloria ; Flynn, Anne N. ; Creinin, Mitchell D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Courtney C. ; Wu, Brenda T. ; Han, Gloria ; Flynn, Anne N. ; Creinin, Mitchell D.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to review clinical practice outcomes of early pregnancy loss (EPL) medical management using mifepristone and misoprostol outside of a clinical trial setting. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed a deidentified database of patients who received mifepristone-misoprostol for EPL from May 2018 to May 2021 at our academic center–based clinic, which was a study site for a multicenter mifepristone-misoprostol EPL trial completed in March 2018. All patients received mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally or buccally, with clinic follow-up typically scheduled within 1 week. The primary outcome was successful medical management, defined as management without the need for aspiration, and the secondary outcomes included additional interventions and indications, follow-up ultrasonography findings, and adverse events requiring treatment. We treated 90 patients with a median ultrasound-measured gestational size of 49 (range 30–80) days and median time from mifepristone to misoprostol of 24 (range 8–66) hours. Follow-up was completed in clinic by 80 (88.9%), completed remotely by five (5.6%), and not completed by five (5.6%) patients. Overall, 76 (95% CI 82.9%–96.0%) of 85 patients (89.4%) with follow-up were successfully managed without uterine aspiration. Eighty patients had initial follow-up ultrasonography interpreted as gestational sac expulsion; seven (8.8%) of these ultimately underwent aspiration, including one patient who had a previously undiagnosed cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Two patients had significant safety outcomes: one pelvic infection and one blood transfusion during aspiration in the patient with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Outside of a clinical trial setting, medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol remains effective and safe. Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is effective and safe outside of a clinical trial setting. A standardized protocol based on the best available clinical trial evidence can be used in clinical practice for the medical management of EPL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37524147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Early pregnancy loss ; Mifepristone ; Miscarriage ; Misoprostol</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 2023-10, Vol.126, p.110134-110134, Article 110134</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37524147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Brenda T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anne N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creinin, Mitchell D.</creatorcontrib><title>Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>This study aimed to review clinical practice outcomes of early pregnancy loss (EPL) medical management using mifepristone and misoprostol outside of a clinical trial setting. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed a deidentified database of patients who received mifepristone-misoprostol for EPL from May 2018 to May 2021 at our academic center–based clinic, which was a study site for a multicenter mifepristone-misoprostol EPL trial completed in March 2018. All patients received mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally or buccally, with clinic follow-up typically scheduled within 1 week. The primary outcome was successful medical management, defined as management without the need for aspiration, and the secondary outcomes included additional interventions and indications, follow-up ultrasonography findings, and adverse events requiring treatment. We treated 90 patients with a median ultrasound-measured gestational size of 49 (range 30–80) days and median time from mifepristone to misoprostol of 24 (range 8–66) hours. Follow-up was completed in clinic by 80 (88.9%), completed remotely by five (5.6%), and not completed by five (5.6%) patients. Overall, 76 (95% CI 82.9%–96.0%) of 85 patients (89.4%) with follow-up were successfully managed without uterine aspiration. Eighty patients had initial follow-up ultrasonography interpreted as gestational sac expulsion; seven (8.8%) of these ultimately underwent aspiration, including one patient who had a previously undiagnosed cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Two patients had significant safety outcomes: one pelvic infection and one blood transfusion during aspiration in the patient with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Outside of a clinical trial setting, medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol remains effective and safe. Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is effective and safe outside of a clinical trial setting. A standardized protocol based on the best available clinical trial evidence can be used in clinical practice for the medical management of EPL.</description><subject>Early pregnancy loss</subject><subject>Mifepristone</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Misoprostol</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6FaTgxUtrkqZNi15kWf_Aghc9h3Q6XbK0aU26wn57s1YFb54GZt6bx_sRcsVowijLb7YJ9HZ0GnAYTW8TTnmasHBKxRGZs0KWMc1YcUzmlDIay4KLGTnzfksplWUmT8kslRkXTMg5uVtp1-6jweHGagv7qO29jzqsDeg26rTVG-zQjpGxEbTGfq2HED4awHNy0ujW48X3XJC3h9Xr8ilevzw-L-_XMYg0H-Na6lxg3UhZ5ZzWupKphKLCvMlKKirNecZ0AwIYrRotkVU8l1xzVtZZWYoyXZDr6e_g-vcd-lF1xgO2rbbY77zihRB5EUrzIL2dpOBCEYeNGpzptNsrRtUBn9qqP_jUAZ-a8AX35XfQrgoMfr0_vIJgNQkw1P0w6JQHgxYCL4cwqro3_wr6BJ4aiNc</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Baker, Courtney C.</creator><creator>Wu, Brenda T.</creator><creator>Han, Gloria</creator><creator>Flynn, Anne N.</creator><creator>Creinin, Mitchell D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice</title><author>Baker, Courtney C. ; Wu, Brenda T. ; Han, Gloria ; Flynn, Anne N. ; Creinin, Mitchell D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Early pregnancy loss</topic><topic>Mifepristone</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Misoprostol</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Brenda T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anne N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creinin, Mitchell D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Courtney C.</au><au>Wu, Brenda T.</au><au>Han, Gloria</au><au>Flynn, Anne N.</au><au>Creinin, Mitchell D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>126</volume><spage>110134</spage><epage>110134</epage><pages>110134-110134</pages><artnum>110134</artnum><issn>0010-7824</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to review clinical practice outcomes of early pregnancy loss (EPL) medical management using mifepristone and misoprostol outside of a clinical trial setting. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed a deidentified database of patients who received mifepristone-misoprostol for EPL from May 2018 to May 2021 at our academic center–based clinic, which was a study site for a multicenter mifepristone-misoprostol EPL trial completed in March 2018. All patients received mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally or buccally, with clinic follow-up typically scheduled within 1 week. The primary outcome was successful medical management, defined as management without the need for aspiration, and the secondary outcomes included additional interventions and indications, follow-up ultrasonography findings, and adverse events requiring treatment. We treated 90 patients with a median ultrasound-measured gestational size of 49 (range 30–80) days and median time from mifepristone to misoprostol of 24 (range 8–66) hours. Follow-up was completed in clinic by 80 (88.9%), completed remotely by five (5.6%), and not completed by five (5.6%) patients. Overall, 76 (95% CI 82.9%–96.0%) of 85 patients (89.4%) with follow-up were successfully managed without uterine aspiration. Eighty patients had initial follow-up ultrasonography interpreted as gestational sac expulsion; seven (8.8%) of these ultimately underwent aspiration, including one patient who had a previously undiagnosed cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Two patients had significant safety outcomes: one pelvic infection and one blood transfusion during aspiration in the patient with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Outside of a clinical trial setting, medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol remains effective and safe. Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is effective and safe outside of a clinical trial setting. A standardized protocol based on the best available clinical trial evidence can be used in clinical practice for the medical management of EPL.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37524147</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-7824
ispartof Contraception (Stoneham), 2023-10, Vol.126, p.110134-110134, Article 110134
issn 0010-7824
1879-0518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2844680512
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Early pregnancy loss
Mifepristone
Miscarriage
Misoprostol
title Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A02%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20pregnancy%20loss%20medical%20management%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Baker,%20Courtney%20C.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=126&rft.spage=110134&rft.epage=110134&rft.pages=110134-110134&rft.artnum=110134&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2844680512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-d7a64edf77b620dab737c8be6f5904ba2251afc4c10bfa7e1b2672a219d599493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844680512&rft_id=info:pmid/37524147&rfr_iscdi=true