The influence of peripheral information on a proactive process during multitasking

• Published in: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2024-06, Vol.77 (6), p.1352-1362
• Main Authors: Kimura, Tsukasa, Kawashima, Tomoya
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Attention - physiology; Auditory Perception - physiology; Discrimination, Psychological - physiology; Female; Humans; Male; Multitasking; Multitasking Behavior - physiology; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Reaction Time - physiology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1747-0218; 1747-0226
• DOI: 10.1177/17470218231195198

The aim of this study was to examine whether peripheral information facilitates proactive processes during multitasking. For this purpose, peripheral information was presented regularly during multitasking and its effects on the performance of a tracking task (main task: reactive process) and a discrimination task (sub-task: proactive process) were examined. Experiment 1 presented peripheral information (white circles) in the same sensory modality (visual) as the information used for multitasking and the number of circle presentations was manipulated. In Experiment 2, a pure tone (auditory) was presented as peripheral information. We found that, in both experiments, the difficulty of the tracking task influenced discrimination performance, showing that as the difficulty of the tracking task (reactive process) increased, more cognitive resources were consumed in the tracking task, resulting in a decrease in cognitive resources available for the discrimination task (proactive process). In addition, regular presentation of peripheral information facilitated discrimination task performance in both experiments. Interestingly, this peripheral information also facilitated the tracking task performance (reactive process) even if the tracking task was difficult. Moreover, this promoting effect of the peripheral information occurred regardless of the sensory modality. This study revealed that processing of peripheral information facilitates the proactive process even if more cognitive resources are consumed, and that this facilitating effect does not conflict with multitasking and provides a margin of cognitive resources and also facilitates the reactive process. Our results provide evidence of how peripheral information and cognitive resources are used during multitasking.