Nutrition support and clinical outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Nutrition support is frequently required post allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and while there is some evidence on the benefits of enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely used in practice. The study aimed to examine the impact of EN versus PN on early outcomes following...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2023-10, Vol.58 (10), p.1137-1142
Main Authors: Andersen, Sarah, Xu, Jiani, Llewellyn, Stacey, Kennedy, Glen, Bauer, Judy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
692/699/67/1990
692/700/228
Allografts
Bone marrow
Cell Biology
Clinical outcomes
Enteral nutrition
Hematology
Internal Medicine
Leukocytes (neutrophilic)
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nutrition
Parenteral nutrition
Patients
Public Health
Stem cell transplantation
Stem Cells
Transplantation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3
container_end_page 1142
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1137
container_title Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)
container_volume 58
creator Andersen, Sarah
Xu, Jiani
Llewellyn, Stacey
Kennedy, Glen
Bauer, Judy
description Nutrition support is frequently required post allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and while there is some evidence on the benefits of enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely used in practice. The study aimed to examine the impact of EN versus PN on early outcomes following SCT. All patients who underwent allogeneic SCT over 2.5 years were included in the analysis. Data was retrospectively collected on mode of nutrition support with clinical outcome data obtained from an existing database. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups by logistic, poisson and negative binomial regression, with adjustment for baseline confounders as appropriate. Patients who received EN then changed to PN had a longer length of hospital stay compared to those who received EN only (IR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.38, p  
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41409-023-02080-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2846931834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2846931834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-AQ8S8OKlOmmSJjmK-AWiF_UaYppdKm1SkxTx35t1_QAPEoYMzDPvvLwIHRA4IUDlaWKEgaqgpqVAQiU20Iww0VScNnwTzaBuZEVpo3bQbkovAIQx4NtohwrOaiLVDD3dTTl2uQsep2kcQ8zY-BbbvvOdNT0OU7ZhcAkvQt-Ht84vsSnN0nnXWZyyG7B1fY9zND6NvfHZrMT20NbC9Mntf_1z9Hh58XB-Xd3eX92cn91WtljIlRCMgrQtAFimwCom68a0yhBBiWTtszMNa1tlOVegqJWcLHhtqeNStAIsnaPjte4Yw-vkUtZDl1aGjHdhSrqWrFFFirKCHv1BX8IUfXFXqHIOKC9vjuo1ZWNIKbqFHmM3mPiuCehV6nqdui6p68_UtShLh1_S0_Pg2p-V75gLQNdAKiO_dPH39j-yHyrUjRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2873103535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrition support and clinical outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Andersen, Sarah ; Xu, Jiani ; Llewellyn, Stacey ; Kennedy, Glen ; Bauer, Judy</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah ; Xu, Jiani ; Llewellyn, Stacey ; Kennedy, Glen ; Bauer, Judy</creatorcontrib><description>Nutrition support is frequently required post allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and while there is some evidence on the benefits of enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely used in practice. The study aimed to examine the impact of EN versus PN on early outcomes following SCT. All patients who underwent allogeneic SCT over 2.5 years were included in the analysis. Data was retrospectively collected on mode of nutrition support with clinical outcome data obtained from an existing database. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups by logistic, poisson and negative binomial regression, with adjustment for baseline confounders as appropriate. Patients who received EN then changed to PN had a longer length of hospital stay compared to those who received EN only (IR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.38, p  &lt; 0.001). Compared to those who received EN only, patients who received EN that changed to PN or PN only had a longer time to neutrophil engraftment (IR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02–1.20, p  = 0.016 and IR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03–1.30, p  = 0.017) and platelet engraftment (IR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08–1.33, p  &lt; 0.001 and IR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.42, p  = 0.002). Enteral nutrition should be first line nutritional support for patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02080-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37542189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/699/67/1990 ; 692/700/228 ; Allografts ; Bone marrow ; Cell Biology ; Clinical outcomes ; Enteral nutrition ; Hematology ; Internal Medicine ; Leukocytes (neutrophilic) ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nutrition ; Parenteral nutrition ; Patients ; Public Health ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem Cells ; Transplantation</subject><ispartof>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke), 2023-10, Vol.58 (10), p.1137-1142</ispartof><rights>Crown 2023</rights><rights>2023. Crown.</rights><rights>Crown 2023.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9200-8186</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Judy</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrition support and clinical outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation</title><title>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)</title><addtitle>Bone Marrow Transplant</addtitle><addtitle>Bone Marrow Transplant</addtitle><description>Nutrition support is frequently required post allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and while there is some evidence on the benefits of enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely used in practice. The study aimed to examine the impact of EN versus PN on early outcomes following SCT. All patients who underwent allogeneic SCT over 2.5 years were included in the analysis. Data was retrospectively collected on mode of nutrition support with clinical outcome data obtained from an existing database. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups by logistic, poisson and negative binomial regression, with adjustment for baseline confounders as appropriate. Patients who received EN then changed to PN had a longer length of hospital stay compared to those who received EN only (IR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.38, p  &lt; 0.001). Compared to those who received EN only, patients who received EN that changed to PN or PN only had a longer time to neutrophil engraftment (IR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02–1.20, p  = 0.016 and IR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03–1.30, p  = 0.017) and platelet engraftment (IR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08–1.33, p  &lt; 0.001 and IR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.42, p  = 0.002). Enteral nutrition should be first line nutritional support for patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.</description><subject>692/699/67/1990</subject><subject>692/700/228</subject><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Enteral nutrition</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Parenteral nutrition</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><issn>0268-3369</issn><issn>1476-5365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-AQ8S8OKlOmmSJjmK-AWiF_UaYppdKm1SkxTx35t1_QAPEoYMzDPvvLwIHRA4IUDlaWKEgaqgpqVAQiU20Iww0VScNnwTzaBuZEVpo3bQbkovAIQx4NtohwrOaiLVDD3dTTl2uQsep2kcQ8zY-BbbvvOdNT0OU7ZhcAkvQt-Ht84vsSnN0nnXWZyyG7B1fY9zND6NvfHZrMT20NbC9Mntf_1z9Hh58XB-Xd3eX92cn91WtljIlRCMgrQtAFimwCom68a0yhBBiWTtszMNa1tlOVegqJWcLHhtqeNStAIsnaPjte4Yw-vkUtZDl1aGjHdhSrqWrFFFirKCHv1BX8IUfXFXqHIOKC9vjuo1ZWNIKbqFHmM3mPiuCehV6nqdui6p68_UtShLh1_S0_Pg2p-V75gLQNdAKiO_dPH39j-yHyrUjRk</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Andersen, Sarah</creator><creator>Xu, Jiani</creator><creator>Llewellyn, Stacey</creator><creator>Kennedy, Glen</creator><creator>Bauer, Judy</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-8186</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Nutrition support and clinical outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation</title><author>Andersen, Sarah ; Xu, Jiani ; Llewellyn, Stacey ; Kennedy, Glen ; Bauer, Judy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>692/699/67/1990</topic><topic>692/700/228</topic><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Enteral nutrition</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Parenteral nutrition</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llewellyn, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Judy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, Sarah</au><au>Xu, Jiani</au><au>Llewellyn, Stacey</au><au>Kennedy, Glen</au><au>Bauer, Judy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrition support and clinical outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke)</jtitle><stitle>Bone Marrow Transplant</stitle><addtitle>Bone Marrow Transplant</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1137</spage><epage>1142</epage><pages>1137-1142</pages><issn>0268-3369</issn><eissn>1476-5365</eissn><abstract>Nutrition support is frequently required post allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and while there is some evidence on the benefits of enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) is widely used in practice. The study aimed to examine the impact of EN versus PN on early outcomes following SCT. All patients who underwent allogeneic SCT over 2.5 years were included in the analysis. Data was retrospectively collected on mode of nutrition support with clinical outcome data obtained from an existing database. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups by logistic, poisson and negative binomial regression, with adjustment for baseline confounders as appropriate. Patients who received EN then changed to PN had a longer length of hospital stay compared to those who received EN only (IR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.38, p  &lt; 0.001). Compared to those who received EN only, patients who received EN that changed to PN or PN only had a longer time to neutrophil engraftment (IR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02–1.20, p  = 0.016 and IR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03–1.30, p  = 0.017) and platelet engraftment (IR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08–1.33, p  &lt; 0.001 and IR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.42, p  = 0.002). Enteral nutrition should be first line nutritional support for patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37542189</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41409-023-02080-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-8186</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3369
ispartof Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke), 2023-10, Vol.58 (10), p.1137-1142
issn 0268-3369
1476-5365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2846931834
source Nexis UK; Springer Nature
subjects 692/699/67/1990
692/700/228
Allografts
Bone marrow
Cell Biology
Clinical outcomes
Enteral nutrition
Hematology
Internal Medicine
Leukocytes (neutrophilic)
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nutrition
Parenteral nutrition
Patients
Public Health
Stem cell transplantation
Stem Cells
Transplantation
title Nutrition support and clinical outcomes following allogeneic stem cell transplantation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-27T10%3A25%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrition%20support%20and%20clinical%20outcomes%20following%20allogeneic%20stem%20cell%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=Bone%20marrow%20transplantation%20(Basingstoke)&rft.au=Andersen,%20Sarah&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1137&rft.epage=1142&rft.pages=1137-1142&rft.issn=0268-3369&rft.eissn=1476-5365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41409-023-02080-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2846931834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-774308cd000c490c94826ad9a173184dbea64dd9c559093c851f52c3e587d70c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2873103535&rft_id=info:pmid/37542189&rfr_iscdi=true