Loading…

Does fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aims This meta‐analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods We systemically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception until April 26, 2023. We included ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetic medicine 2024-01, Vol.41 (1), p.e15196-n/a
Main Authors: Amer, Basma Ehab, Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam, Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed, Afifi, Eslam, Aboelkhier, Menna M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e15196
container_title Diabetic medicine
container_volume 41
creator Amer, Basma Ehab
Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam
Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed
Afifi, Eslam
Aboelkhier, Menna M.
description Aims This meta‐analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods We systemically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception until April 26, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fully closed‐loop AID versus conventional insulin therapy. The outcomes were pooled as the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the random effect model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of time in the target glucose range (5.6‐10 mmol/L, 3.9‐10 mmol/L, or 3.9‐8 mmol/L, depending on the study). Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of time spent in hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia. Results We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel design), compromising 390 patients. Our analysis showed that compared to the control group, fully closed‐loop AID increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range by additional 337 min per 24 h (MD = 23.39%, 95% CI [16.64%, 30.14%], p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dme.15196
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2850305660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2850305660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQRi0EopfCghdAltjQRVo7tpObFara8iO1YgPraGKPwZUTB9tpFVY8Ql-BV-NJMNwLC6TOZmZxdEafPkKec3bMy5yYEY-54l3zgGy4bGSlZMcfkg1rZV0J1vID8iSla8Z43YnuMTkQrWraVnQb8uM8YKJ28X6l2oeE5uf3Ox_CTGHJYYSMhropLd5N1KB3NxhX6sY5hhukn_2qAUenqQ5TjsEXlM6QHU450VuXv9C8zkhrahwMmDG9pqd0xAzlCUzg1-QSDZZGmEwY3bfybG_y5czRgU9PySNbFj7b70Py6c3Fx7N31eWHt-_PTi8rLZRoKhy0MJZJY5HzrbUMhi1sW4sKuFTDMChmFOiSWzdcCmBgBpRQ19xICdKKQ_Jq5y3Zvi6Ycj-6pNF7mDAsqa-3igmmmoYV9OV_6HVYYslTqI5xoRrWiUId7SgdQ0oRbT9HN0Jce8763731pbf-T2-FfbE3LsOI5h_5t6gCnOyAW-dxvd_Un19d7JS_AHikp-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2901356093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Amer, Basma Ehab ; Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam ; Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed ; Afifi, Eslam ; Aboelkhier, Menna M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Amer, Basma Ehab ; Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam ; Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed ; Afifi, Eslam ; Aboelkhier, Menna M.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims This meta‐analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods We systemically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception until April 26, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fully closed‐loop AID versus conventional insulin therapy. The outcomes were pooled as the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the random effect model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of time in the target glucose range (5.6‐10 mmol/L, 3.9‐10 mmol/L, or 3.9‐8 mmol/L, depending on the study). Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of time spent in hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia. Results We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel design), compromising 390 patients. Our analysis showed that compared to the control group, fully closed‐loop AID increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range by additional 337 min per 24 h (MD = 23.39%, 95% CI [16.64%, 30.14%], p &lt; 0.01), additional 108 min overnight (MD = 22.40%, 95% CI [12.88%, 31.91%], p &lt; 0.01), and additional 258 min during the daytime period (MD = 26.85%, 95% CI [21.06%, 32.63%], p &lt; 0.01). Compared to the control group, the overall time in hyperglycaemia was shortened by 326 min per 24 h (MD = −22.67%, 95% CI [−30.87%, −14.46%], p &lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall, overnight, and daytime periods spent in hypoglycaemia. Conclusions Our meta‐analysis suggests that fully closed‐loop AID may improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly for those with more challenging diabetes management. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of implementing these systems in clinical practice. [Correction added on 26 August 2023 after first online publication: Under Results, the first sentence “We included seven RCTs (three crossover and one parallel designs)” has been changed to “We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel designs)”.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dme.15196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37567739</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>AID ; Automation ; Blood Glucose ; Clinical trials ; Cross-Over Studies ; Daytime ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy ; Glucose ; Glycemic Control ; Humans ; hyperglycaemia ; Hyperglycemia ; Hyperglycemia - drug therapy ; Hyperglycemia - prevention &amp; control ; hypoglycaemia ; Hypoglycemia ; Hypoglycemia - chemically induced ; Hypoglycemia - drug therapy ; Hypoglycemia - prevention &amp; control ; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use ; Insulin ; Insulin - therapeutic use ; Insulin Infusion Systems ; Meta-analysis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; time in target ; type 2 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Diabetic medicine, 2024-01, Vol.41 (1), p.e15196-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Diabetes UK.</rights><rights>Diabetic Medicine © 2024 Diabetes UK</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7787-5508</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37567739$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amer, Basma Ehab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afifi, Eslam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboelkhier, Menna M.</creatorcontrib><title>Does fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Diabetic medicine</title><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><description>Aims This meta‐analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods We systemically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception until April 26, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fully closed‐loop AID versus conventional insulin therapy. The outcomes were pooled as the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the random effect model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of time in the target glucose range (5.6‐10 mmol/L, 3.9‐10 mmol/L, or 3.9‐8 mmol/L, depending on the study). Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of time spent in hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia. Results We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel design), compromising 390 patients. Our analysis showed that compared to the control group, fully closed‐loop AID increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range by additional 337 min per 24 h (MD = 23.39%, 95% CI [16.64%, 30.14%], p &lt; 0.01), additional 108 min overnight (MD = 22.40%, 95% CI [12.88%, 31.91%], p &lt; 0.01), and additional 258 min during the daytime period (MD = 26.85%, 95% CI [21.06%, 32.63%], p &lt; 0.01). Compared to the control group, the overall time in hyperglycaemia was shortened by 326 min per 24 h (MD = −22.67%, 95% CI [−30.87%, −14.46%], p &lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall, overnight, and daytime periods spent in hypoglycaemia. Conclusions Our meta‐analysis suggests that fully closed‐loop AID may improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly for those with more challenging diabetes management. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of implementing these systems in clinical practice. [Correction added on 26 August 2023 after first online publication: Under Results, the first sentence “We included seven RCTs (three crossover and one parallel designs)” has been changed to “We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel designs)”.]</description><subject>AID</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood Glucose</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glycemic Control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperglycaemia</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>hypoglycaemia</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Insulin Infusion Systems</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>time in target</subject><subject>type 2 diabetes</subject><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQRi0EopfCghdAltjQRVo7tpObFara8iO1YgPraGKPwZUTB9tpFVY8Ql-BV-NJMNwLC6TOZmZxdEafPkKec3bMy5yYEY-54l3zgGy4bGSlZMcfkg1rZV0J1vID8iSla8Z43YnuMTkQrWraVnQb8uM8YKJ28X6l2oeE5uf3Ox_CTGHJYYSMhropLd5N1KB3NxhX6sY5hhukn_2qAUenqQ5TjsEXlM6QHU450VuXv9C8zkhrahwMmDG9pqd0xAzlCUzg1-QSDZZGmEwY3bfybG_y5czRgU9PySNbFj7b70Py6c3Fx7N31eWHt-_PTi8rLZRoKhy0MJZJY5HzrbUMhi1sW4sKuFTDMChmFOiSWzdcCmBgBpRQ19xICdKKQ_Jq5y3Zvi6Ycj-6pNF7mDAsqa-3igmmmoYV9OV_6HVYYslTqI5xoRrWiUId7SgdQ0oRbT9HN0Jce8763731pbf-T2-FfbE3LsOI5h_5t6gCnOyAW-dxvd_Un19d7JS_AHikp-Q</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Amer, Basma Ehab</creator><creator>Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam</creator><creator>Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed</creator><creator>Afifi, Eslam</creator><creator>Aboelkhier, Menna M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-5508</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Does fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Amer, Basma Ehab ; Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam ; Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed ; Afifi, Eslam ; Aboelkhier, Menna M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AID</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood Glucose</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glycemic Control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperglycaemia</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>hypoglycaemia</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Insulin Infusion Systems</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>time in target</topic><topic>type 2 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amer, Basma Ehab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afifi, Eslam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboelkhier, Menna M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amer, Basma Ehab</au><au>Yaqout, Yasmeen Essam</au><au>Abozaid, Ahmed Mohamed</au><au>Afifi, Eslam</au><au>Aboelkhier, Menna M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diabet Med</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e15196</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e15196-n/a</pages><issn>0742-3071</issn><eissn>1464-5491</eissn><abstract>Aims This meta‐analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods We systemically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception until April 26, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fully closed‐loop AID versus conventional insulin therapy. The outcomes were pooled as the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the random effect model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of time in the target glucose range (5.6‐10 mmol/L, 3.9‐10 mmol/L, or 3.9‐8 mmol/L, depending on the study). Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of time spent in hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia. Results We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel design), compromising 390 patients. Our analysis showed that compared to the control group, fully closed‐loop AID increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range by additional 337 min per 24 h (MD = 23.39%, 95% CI [16.64%, 30.14%], p &lt; 0.01), additional 108 min overnight (MD = 22.40%, 95% CI [12.88%, 31.91%], p &lt; 0.01), and additional 258 min during the daytime period (MD = 26.85%, 95% CI [21.06%, 32.63%], p &lt; 0.01). Compared to the control group, the overall time in hyperglycaemia was shortened by 326 min per 24 h (MD = −22.67%, 95% CI [−30.87%, −14.46%], p &lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall, overnight, and daytime periods spent in hypoglycaemia. Conclusions Our meta‐analysis suggests that fully closed‐loop AID may improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly for those with more challenging diabetes management. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of implementing these systems in clinical practice. [Correction added on 26 August 2023 after first online publication: Under Results, the first sentence “We included seven RCTs (three crossover and one parallel designs)” has been changed to “We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel designs)”.]</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37567739</pmid><doi>10.1111/dme.15196</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-5508</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3071
ispartof Diabetic medicine, 2024-01, Vol.41 (1), p.e15196-n/a
issn 0742-3071
1464-5491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2850305660
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects AID
Automation
Blood Glucose
Clinical trials
Cross-Over Studies
Daytime
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
Glucose
Glycemic Control
Humans
hyperglycaemia
Hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia - drug therapy
Hyperglycemia - prevention & control
hypoglycaemia
Hypoglycemia
Hypoglycemia - chemically induced
Hypoglycemia - drug therapy
Hypoglycemia - prevention & control
Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use
Insulin
Insulin - therapeutic use
Insulin Infusion Systems
Meta-analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
time in target
type 2 diabetes
title Does fully closed‐loop automated insulin delivery improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20fully%20closed%E2%80%90loop%20automated%20insulin%20delivery%20improve%20glycaemic%20control%20in%20patients%20with%20type%202%20diabetes?%20A%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Diabetic%20medicine&rft.au=Amer,%20Basma%20Ehab&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e15196&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e15196-n/a&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1464-5491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dme.15196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2850305660%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-ebc3df04dfe118ff0ab8a87fe5a145bbb50d5ac567c6143a0adbe4a221d44a4f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2901356093&rft_id=info:pmid/37567739&rfr_iscdi=true