Structure of multidisciplinary heart teams, a survey-based heart team study

• Published in: Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2023-08, Vol.37 (2)
• Main Authors: Imran Hamid, Umar, Modine, Thomas, Maessen, Jos, van ‘t Hof, Arnoud, Sondergaard, Lars, Bleiziffer, Sabine, Lancellotti, Patrizio, Siepe, Matthias, Sardari Nia, Peyman
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 2753-670X; 2753-670X
• DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivad134

Abstract OBJECTIVES Multidisciplinary approach is well established in various disciplines, with evidence highlighting improved patient outcomes. The objective of this survey was to determine the real-world practice of heart teams across Europe. METHODS The survey was drafted after a consensus opinion from the authors. The survey was sent to cardiac surgeons and cardiologists identified through electronic search. The survey link and the information sheet were sent through email followed by survey completion reminders. The survey responses were cumulated and analysed. RESULTS Among 2188 invited clinicians, 220 clinicians from 26 countries took part in the survey (response rate 10%). The completion rate for the survey questions was 85%. A total of 140 (64%) were cardiac surgeons and 80 (36%) were cardiologists. The heart team meeting frequency was weekly according to 104 (55%) respondents. This was conducted face to face according to 139 (73%) of the responses. Eighty-seven (56%) of the respondents reported 10–20% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were discussed at the heart team meeting. Seventy-nine (47%) respondents had ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention institutional guidelines. Fifty-four (32%) respondents reported an audit process for the heart team decisions. CONCLUSIONS This survey suggests that there is marked variability in the infra-structure and execution of heart teams in different institutions. The results of the survey suggest a need to formulate guidelines on the composition and execution of heart teams which may result in an increase in transparency of decision-making within different institutions in reporting and comparing outcomes. The concept of multidisciplinary teams is well established [1, 2].