Effectiveness analysis of posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion assisted by one-hole split endoscope for L4, 5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion assisted by one-hole split endoscope (OSE) and traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of L4, 5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). MethodsThe clinical data of 58 patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi 2023-08, Vol.37 (8), p.989-995
Main Authors: Liu, Changzhen, Huang, Weiguo, Li, Jizheng, Geng, Xiaopeng, Dou, Yongfeng, Cao, Shuai, Hou, Dongpo, Zhu, Tengyue, Sun, Zhaozhong
Format: Article
Language:Chinese
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion assisted by one-hole split endoscope (OSE) and traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of L4, 5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). MethodsThe clinical data of 58 patients with DLS who met the selection criteria admitted between February 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 26 were treated with OSE-assisted posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion (OSE group) and 32 were treated with PLIF (PLIF group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index, Meyerding grade, lower limb symptom side, decompression side, stenosis type, and preoperative low back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, leg pain VAS score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the height of the anterior and posterior margins of the intervertebral space (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital st
ISSN:1002-1892
DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202304098