Loading…

An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy

Potassium replacement protocols are used to standardise practice, reduce risk, and ensure timely potassium replacement, but there is considerable variability in their development and use, particularly as part of critical care nursing practice. To synthesise the research evidence on how potassium rep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Intensive & critical care nursing 2023-12, Vol.79, p.103524-103524, Article 103524
Main Authors: O'Neill, Kylie, Bloomer, Melissa J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26a93663996b6aceb1335b393a9d3f769d1149f76d4a1706d164b5e4a84443a83
container_end_page 103524
container_issue
container_start_page 103524
container_title Intensive & critical care nursing
container_volume 79
creator O'Neill, Kylie
Bloomer, Melissa J
description Potassium replacement protocols are used to standardise practice, reduce risk, and ensure timely potassium replacement, but there is considerable variability in their development and use, particularly as part of critical care nursing practice. To synthesise the research evidence on how potassium replacement protocols are used in adult critical care; and how critical care nurses’ role and practice is influenced by a potassium replacement protocol. The research question was ‘How are protocols used by intensive care clinicians to guide potassium replacement in adult critical care?’ A structured integrative review was undertaken. A combination of keywords, synonyms, and Medical Subject Headings were used across the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. Records were independently assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All papers were assessed for quality. A narrative synthesis was used to analyse and present the findings. Ten studies were included in this review from 4076 records identified. Narrative synthesis revealed five categories: (i) protocol design demonstrating variation in protocol mechanisms, (ii) protocol rationale eliciting reasonings for protocol implementation, (iii) protocol use describing how protocols were nurse-driven enabling nursing autonomy (iv) protocol adherence highlighting variability in protocol compliance and (v) critical care nurse acceptability and feasibility coupling greater shared responsibility for patient care and improved clinician satisfaction. Safe, high-quality care, supported by evidence continues to be a priority. Protocolised potassium replacement can improve patient outcomes and promote nurses’ autonomy, efficiency, and job satisfaction. Recognising and promoting critical care nurses’ expert assessment skills and clinical decision-making is essential for optimising efficient, safe, and high-quality patient care. Although protocol deviations are accommodated in protocol development, comprehensive documentation to justify protocol deviations is key to justifying practice. Understanding protocol deviations are crucial to inform future protocol development, improvements, and evaluation to further enhance critical care nursing practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103524
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854347665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964339723001416</els_id><sourcerecordid>2864155480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26a93663996b6aceb1335b393a9d3f769d1149f76d4a1706d164b5e4a84443a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT9rHDEQxUWIIWfHXyCVII2L7EXakXQrk8bYzh8wuIlrodPOBR270kbSnnGVr26tL01cpJrh8XvDzDxCPnC25oyrz_u1dy6sW9ZCFUC24g1ZcQltIxiot2TFtBINgN68I6c57xljGjq5In-uAvWh4K9kiz8gTXjw-Ejjjk6x2Jz9PFZtGqzDEUOhU4olujjQOWM1Upd88c4O1NmEl_QGDzjEaUE_vSA29P8yNMxp0ecSQxyf3pOTnR0ynv-tZ-Th6-3P6-_N3f23H9dXd40DqUrTKqtBKdBabVXdZcsB5BY0WN3DbqN0z7nQtemF5Rumeq7EVqKwnRACbAdn5OI4tx7we8ZczOizw2GwAeOcTdtJAWKjlKzox1foPs4p1O0qpQSXUnSsUu2RcinmnHBnpuRHm54MZ2bJxOzNkolZMjHHTKrpy9GE9dT66GSy8xgc9j6hK6aP_n_2Zx5HlYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864155480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><creator>O'Neill, Kylie ; Bloomer, Melissa J</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Kylie ; Bloomer, Melissa J</creatorcontrib><description>Potassium replacement protocols are used to standardise practice, reduce risk, and ensure timely potassium replacement, but there is considerable variability in their development and use, particularly as part of critical care nursing practice. To synthesise the research evidence on how potassium replacement protocols are used in adult critical care; and how critical care nurses’ role and practice is influenced by a potassium replacement protocol. The research question was ‘How are protocols used by intensive care clinicians to guide potassium replacement in adult critical care?’ A structured integrative review was undertaken. A combination of keywords, synonyms, and Medical Subject Headings were used across the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. Records were independently assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All papers were assessed for quality. A narrative synthesis was used to analyse and present the findings. Ten studies were included in this review from 4076 records identified. Narrative synthesis revealed five categories: (i) protocol design demonstrating variation in protocol mechanisms, (ii) protocol rationale eliciting reasonings for protocol implementation, (iii) protocol use describing how protocols were nurse-driven enabling nursing autonomy (iv) protocol adherence highlighting variability in protocol compliance and (v) critical care nurse acceptability and feasibility coupling greater shared responsibility for patient care and improved clinician satisfaction. Safe, high-quality care, supported by evidence continues to be a priority. Protocolised potassium replacement can improve patient outcomes and promote nurses’ autonomy, efficiency, and job satisfaction. Recognising and promoting critical care nurses’ expert assessment skills and clinical decision-making is essential for optimising efficient, safe, and high-quality patient care. Although protocol deviations are accommodated in protocol development, comprehensive documentation to justify protocol deviations is key to justifying practice. Understanding protocol deviations are crucial to inform future protocol development, improvements, and evaluation to further enhance critical care nursing practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-3397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newcastle: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Autonomy ; Clinical assessment ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical skills ; Critical care ; Electrolytes ; Feasibility ; Integrative review ; Intensive care ; Job satisfaction ; Medical research ; Narratives ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Potassium ; Professional practice ; Quality of care ; Risk reduction ; Subject headings ; Synonyms ; Treatment protocols ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing, 2023-12, Vol.79, p.103524-103524, Article 103524</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26a93663996b6aceb1335b393a9d3f769d1149f76d4a1706d164b5e4a84443a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2864155480/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2864155480?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21394,21395,27924,27925,30999,33611,33612,34530,34531,43733,44115,74093,74511</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Kylie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloomer, Melissa J</creatorcontrib><title>An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy</title><title>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing</title><description>Potassium replacement protocols are used to standardise practice, reduce risk, and ensure timely potassium replacement, but there is considerable variability in their development and use, particularly as part of critical care nursing practice. To synthesise the research evidence on how potassium replacement protocols are used in adult critical care; and how critical care nurses’ role and practice is influenced by a potassium replacement protocol. The research question was ‘How are protocols used by intensive care clinicians to guide potassium replacement in adult critical care?’ A structured integrative review was undertaken. A combination of keywords, synonyms, and Medical Subject Headings were used across the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. Records were independently assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All papers were assessed for quality. A narrative synthesis was used to analyse and present the findings. Ten studies were included in this review from 4076 records identified. Narrative synthesis revealed five categories: (i) protocol design demonstrating variation in protocol mechanisms, (ii) protocol rationale eliciting reasonings for protocol implementation, (iii) protocol use describing how protocols were nurse-driven enabling nursing autonomy (iv) protocol adherence highlighting variability in protocol compliance and (v) critical care nurse acceptability and feasibility coupling greater shared responsibility for patient care and improved clinician satisfaction. Safe, high-quality care, supported by evidence continues to be a priority. Protocolised potassium replacement can improve patient outcomes and promote nurses’ autonomy, efficiency, and job satisfaction. Recognising and promoting critical care nurses’ expert assessment skills and clinical decision-making is essential for optimising efficient, safe, and high-quality patient care. Although protocol deviations are accommodated in protocol development, comprehensive documentation to justify protocol deviations is key to justifying practice. Understanding protocol deviations are crucial to inform future protocol development, improvements, and evaluation to further enhance critical care nursing practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical skills</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Integrative review</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Subject headings</subject><subject>Synonyms</subject><subject>Treatment protocols</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0964-3397</issn><issn>1532-4036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT9rHDEQxUWIIWfHXyCVII2L7EXakXQrk8bYzh8wuIlrodPOBR270kbSnnGVr26tL01cpJrh8XvDzDxCPnC25oyrz_u1dy6sW9ZCFUC24g1ZcQltIxiot2TFtBINgN68I6c57xljGjq5In-uAvWh4K9kiz8gTXjw-Ejjjk6x2Jz9PFZtGqzDEUOhU4olujjQOWM1Upd88c4O1NmEl_QGDzjEaUE_vSA29P8yNMxp0ecSQxyf3pOTnR0ynv-tZ-Th6-3P6-_N3f23H9dXd40DqUrTKqtBKdBabVXdZcsB5BY0WN3DbqN0z7nQtemF5Rumeq7EVqKwnRACbAdn5OI4tx7we8ZczOizw2GwAeOcTdtJAWKjlKzox1foPs4p1O0qpQSXUnSsUu2RcinmnHBnpuRHm54MZ2bJxOzNkolZMjHHTKrpy9GE9dT66GSy8xgc9j6hK6aP_n_2Zx5HlYg</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>O'Neill, Kylie</creator><creator>Bloomer, Melissa J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy</title><author>O'Neill, Kylie ; Bloomer, Melissa J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26a93663996b6aceb1335b393a9d3f769d1149f76d4a1706d164b5e4a84443a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical skills</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Integrative review</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Subject headings</topic><topic>Synonyms</topic><topic>Treatment protocols</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Kylie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloomer, Melissa J</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Neill, Kylie</au><au>Bloomer, Melissa J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy</atitle><jtitle>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>79</volume><spage>103524</spage><epage>103524</epage><pages>103524-103524</pages><artnum>103524</artnum><issn>0964-3397</issn><eissn>1532-4036</eissn><abstract>Potassium replacement protocols are used to standardise practice, reduce risk, and ensure timely potassium replacement, but there is considerable variability in their development and use, particularly as part of critical care nursing practice. To synthesise the research evidence on how potassium replacement protocols are used in adult critical care; and how critical care nurses’ role and practice is influenced by a potassium replacement protocol. The research question was ‘How are protocols used by intensive care clinicians to guide potassium replacement in adult critical care?’ A structured integrative review was undertaken. A combination of keywords, synonyms, and Medical Subject Headings were used across the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. Records were independently assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All papers were assessed for quality. A narrative synthesis was used to analyse and present the findings. Ten studies were included in this review from 4076 records identified. Narrative synthesis revealed five categories: (i) protocol design demonstrating variation in protocol mechanisms, (ii) protocol rationale eliciting reasonings for protocol implementation, (iii) protocol use describing how protocols were nurse-driven enabling nursing autonomy (iv) protocol adherence highlighting variability in protocol compliance and (v) critical care nurse acceptability and feasibility coupling greater shared responsibility for patient care and improved clinician satisfaction. Safe, high-quality care, supported by evidence continues to be a priority. Protocolised potassium replacement can improve patient outcomes and promote nurses’ autonomy, efficiency, and job satisfaction. Recognising and promoting critical care nurses’ expert assessment skills and clinical decision-making is essential for optimising efficient, safe, and high-quality patient care. Although protocol deviations are accommodated in protocol development, comprehensive documentation to justify protocol deviations is key to justifying practice. Understanding protocol deviations are crucial to inform future protocol development, improvements, and evaluation to further enhance critical care nursing practice.</abstract><cop>Newcastle</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103524</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-3397
ispartof Intensive & critical care nursing, 2023-12, Vol.79, p.103524-103524, Article 103524
issn 0964-3397
1532-4036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2854347665
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection
subjects Adult
Autonomy
Clinical assessment
Clinical decision making
Clinical medicine
Clinical outcomes
Clinical skills
Critical care
Electrolytes
Feasibility
Integrative review
Intensive care
Job satisfaction
Medical research
Narratives
Nurses
Nursing
Observational studies
Patients
Pediatrics
Potassium
Professional practice
Quality of care
Risk reduction
Subject headings
Synonyms
Treatment protocols
Variability
title An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A38%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20integrative%20review%20of%20potassium%20replacement%20protocol%20use%20in%20critical%20care:%20Development,%20use%20and%20critical%20care%20nurse%20autonomy&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20&%20critical%20care%20nursing&rft.au=O'Neill,%20Kylie&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=79&rft.spage=103524&rft.epage=103524&rft.pages=103524-103524&rft.artnum=103524&rft.issn=0964-3397&rft.eissn=1532-4036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103524&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2864155480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-26a93663996b6aceb1335b393a9d3f769d1149f76d4a1706d164b5e4a84443a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864155480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true