Retrospective benefit-cost analysis of bovine brucellosis control in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil

• Published in: Preventive veterinary medicine 2023-09, Vol.218, p.105992-105992, Article 105992
• Main Authors: Barros, Marcelo Luís, Barddal, Janice Elena Ioris, Santos, Jociane Cristina Quixabeira, Negreiros, Risia Lopes, Rosa, Barbara Medeiros, Teixeira, Ronaldo Carneiro, Prada, Jaime Ricardo Romero, Gonçalves, Vitor Salvador Picão, Ferreira Neto, José Soares
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bovine Brucellosis; Brazil; Control; Economic analysis; Mato Grosso State
• ISSN: 0167-5877; 1873-1716
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105992

From 2001, due to the launching of the National Program for the Control and Eradication of Brucellosis and Tuberculosis, Brazil began a series of studies aimed at the epidemiological characterization of bovine brucellosis in its federative units. In the state of Mato Grosso, studies conducted in 2003 and 2014 showed a reduction in the prevalence of infected herds from 41.2 % to 24 % and in the prevalence of seropositive animals from 10.2 % to 5.1 %. These results stemmed from the efficient heifer vaccination program with S19 implemented by the state. From this scenario, the present study quantified and compared the benefits and costs of bovine brucellosis control in the state through a financial analysis. When considering private and public costs, the Net Present Value (NPV) was estimated at US$ 37.5 million, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was calculated at 31 %, and the Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) was 2.3. When considering only the private costs, the NPV was US$ 51.3 million, the IRR was 46 % and the BCR was 3.43, indicating that the cattle producer in Mato Grosso had a return of US$ 3.43 for each US$ 1.00 invested. Therefore, the bovine brucellosis control actions carried out in the state of Mato Grosso between 2003 and 2014 were highly advantageous from the economic point of view. The most rational way to continue decreasing bovine brucellosis prevalences at low cost in the state is to maintain the heifer vaccination program, using the RB51 vaccine in addition to S19.