A Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing an Electronic Health Record Social Determinants of Health Screening Instrument into Routine Clinical Oncology Practice

• Published in: Annals of surgical oncology 2023-11, Vol.30 (12), p.7299-7308
• Main Authors: Hao, Scarlett B., Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie B., Iasiello, John, Mejia, Christopher, Quinn, Ashley W., Popowicz, Patrycja, Mitsakos, Anastasios, Parikh, Alexander A., Snyder, Rebecca A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cancer; Electronic health records; Electronic medical records; Feasibility studies; Global Health Services Research; Medical screening; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mixed methods research; Oncology; Surgery; Surgical Oncology
• ISSN: 1068-9265; 1534-4681
• DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14124-9

Background Routine screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) in the outpatient oncology setting is uncommon. The primary goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an electronic health record (EHR) SDOH screening instrument into routine, clinical, oncology practice. Methods Adult patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer presenting to a regional cancer center (November 2020 to July 2021) were eligible. Based on the consolidated framework for implementation research, feasibility measures included screening completion, median clinic visit time, and acceptability by the inter-professional care team and patients as measured by semistructured, qualitative interviews and surveys. Secondary outcomes included SDOH needs identified. Results Of 137 eligible patients, 112 (81.8%) were screened for SDOH. Demographics of the cohort included: 41.1% black ( n  = 46), 48.2% rural ( n  = 54), 4.5% uninsured ( n  = 5), and 6.3% Medicaid-insured ( n  = 7) patients. Median visit time was 97 min (95% CI 70–107 min) before and 100 min after implementation (95% CI 75–119 min; p  = 0.95). In total, 95.5% ( n  = 107) reported at least one SDOH need. Clinicians (7/10) reported that SDOH screening was not disruptive and were supportive of ongoing use. Patients (10/10) found the screening acceptable. Screening staff (5/5) reported workflow barriers. Patients and staff also recommended revision of specific instrument questions. Conclusions Routine collection of SDOH in an outpatient oncology setting using an EHR instrument is feasible and does not result in increased visit time for patients or clinicians. However, staff perceptions of clinic workflow disruption were reported. Further investigation to determine whether standardized SDOH assessment can improve cancer care delivery and outcomes is ongoing.